Literature DB >> 27104942

Treatment of complex idiopathic clubfoot using the modified Ponseti method: up to 11 years follow-up.

Hosam E Matar1, Peter Beirne, Colin E Bruce, Neeraj K Garg.   

Abstract

Complex idiopathic clubfeet are distinguished by significant shortening, rigid equinus with a deep crease above the heel, severe plantar flexion of all metatarsals, a deep plantar crease seven across the full width of the sole of the foot and high cavus with a short and hyperextended big toe. Ponseti has devised a modified technique for treating complex clubfeet. We retrospectively identified 11 children (nine males and two females) with 17 complex clubfeet who were treated with the modified Ponseti method. Demographics, severity of clubfoot, number of casts, rate of tendoachilles tenotomy, relapse rate and their management, any additional procedures and data on complications were collected. The average follow-up was 7 years (range 3-11 years) and the average Pirani score was 5.5 (range 4.5-6.0). Initial correction was achieved in all children, with an average of 7 (range 5-10) Ponseti casts. Tendoachilles tenotomy was performed in all 17 feet (100%). The overall relapse rate was 53% (nine feet). Five relapses were managed successfully with repeat casting and four feet were subjected to a second tendoachilles tenotomy. Four feet required extensive surgical releases. A satisfactory outcome was achieved at the final follow-up in 13 of 17 feet (76.5%). Two of these children (two feet) required an additional tibialis anterior transfer. In our experience, the modified Ponseti method is an effective first-line treatment for complex idiopathic clubfoot; however, such children will often require more casts than usual and have a higher rate of tendoachilles tenotomy and a higher risk of relapse requiring surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27104942     DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  7 in total

1.  Correction results of atypical clubfeet managed with modified Ponseti technique: A meta-analysis of 354 feet.

Authors:  Karthick Rangasamy; Vishnu Baburaj; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan; Prateek Behera; Pebam Sudesh; Sabarathinam Ravi Subramanian
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-25

2.  Two-year retrospective cohort results on use of a dynamic unilateral brace for treatment of clubfoot: Can compliance and prevention of recurrence both be achieved?

Authors:  Emily J Farrar; Michelle Lo; Luke Groothoff; Jerald Cunningham; Joseph Theuri
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2022-07-03

3.  Hallux length and deep medial crease in complex clubfeet: Do they recover?

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Shobhit Gupta; Prateek Rastogi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-11

4.  Identification and treatment of residual and relapsed idiopathic clubfoot in 88 children.

Authors:  Jurre H Stouten; Arnold T Besselaar; M C Marieke Van Der Steen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Challenging clubfeet: the arthrogrypotic clubfoot and the complex clubfoot.

Authors:  H J P van Bosse
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Using the modified Ponseti method to treat complex clubfoot: Early results.

Authors:  Celal Bozkurt; Baran Sarıkaya; Serkan Sipahioğlu; Mehmet Akif Altay; Baki Volkan Çetin
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Association of Socioeconomic Status With Relapse After Ponseti Method Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfeet.

Authors:  Lawrence A Akinyoola; Zachary Gunderson; Seungyup Sun; Ryan Fitzgerald; Christine B Caltoum; Tyler W Christman; Robert Bielski; Randall T Loder
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-08-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.