| Literature DB >> 27104218 |
Jessica L Ungerleider1, Todd D Johnson1, Melissa J Hernandez1, Dean I Elhag1, Rebecca L Braden1, Monika Dzieciatkowska2, Kent G Osborn3, Kirk C Hansen2, Ehtisham Mahmud4, Karen L Christman1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine acellular extracellular matrix based hydrogels as potential therapies for treating peripheral artery disease (PAD). We tested the efficacy of using a tissue specific injectable hydrogel, derived from decellularized porcine skeletal muscle (SKM), compared to a new human umbilical cord derived matrix (hUC) hydrogel, which could have greater potential for tissue regeneration because of its young tissue source age.Entities:
Keywords: Biomaterial; Critical Limb Ischemia; Decellularization; Hydrogel; Injectable; Peripheral Artery Disease
Year: 2016 PMID: 27104218 PMCID: PMC4834896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.01.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci ISSN: 2452-302X
Figure 1Functional Perfusion Study Design in a Rat Hindlimb Ischemia Model
(A) In vivo study timeline. (B) Hindlimb perfusion measured with laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA). Image is post-surgery with a significant decrease in perfusion of the ischemic (right) limb compared to the healthy (left) limb. (C) Example perfusion measurement for a single ischemic animal. Healthy limb (blue line), the ischemic limb (red line), and total body (black line) are plotted over time in arbitrary units or perfusion units. Perfusion kinetics ratio was calculated by dividing the slope of the linear region of the healthy limb (blue dotted line) by the slope of the linear region of the ischemic limb (red dotted line). (D) Pre-surgery and immediately post-surgery readings for each treatment group. Histo = histology; Inj = injection; IS = ischemia surgery; PM = perfusion measurement.
Figure 2Hindlimb Tissue Perfusion and Perfusion Kinetics
(A) Hindlimb perfusion measurements over the 42-day period for animals treated with either the skeletal muscle matrix (SKM) (n = 9), human umbilical cord matrix (hUC) (n = 10) hydrogels, or saline (n = 11). Readings are shown after the animal had been under anesthesia for 5 min, 10 min, and after reaching perfusion equilibrium. Vertical dotted line indicates time of treatment injection on day 0. (B) Individual animal perfusion readings on day 35. (C) Example representative perfusion images for each treatment group after the animal was under anesthesia for 10 min. Healthy limbs are on the left and ischemic/treated limbs are on the right. Note: Because the units for perfusion are arbitrary, color comparisons cannot be performed between 2 different animals. (D) Perfusion kinetics for pre-surgery and post-surgery. (E) Pre-injection perfusion kinetics on day −2 (pre-injection). (F) Final perfusion kinetics on day 35. A 2-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare within and between treatment groups. εp < 0.05 for SKM compared to SKM at day 7 as determined by a Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, and σp < 0.05 for both treatment groups compared to saline using a Tukey post hoc test.
Figure 3Histological Assessment of Arteries and Capillaries
(A) Capillary density quantification. (B) There were no differences in arteriole density between all groups, but (C) the average arteriole diameter (p = 0.0389) and (D) density of arterioles with diameter >75 μm (p = 0.0344) was significantly increased in the skeletal muscle matrix (SKM) group. Data from the healthy limb is shown as a reference. (E) Representative image of capillaries stained by alkaline phosphatase for the SKM treatment group. (F) Example arteriole staining with anti-αSMA (red) and nuclei (blue) for saline (n = 11), (G) SKM (n = 9), and (H) human umbilical cord matrix (hUC) (n = 10). *p < 0.05 and scale bars are 100 μm.
Figure 4Biocompatibility Assessment and Muscle Fiber Morphology Quantification
(A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained transverse section showing healthy fiber morphology. (B) Macrophages were stained with CD68 as shown (black arrow). (C) Extracellular matrix stained with a laminin antibody (green) and nuclei were counter stained (blue) for saline (n = 11), human umbilical cord matrix (hUC) (n = 10), and skeletal muscle matrix (SKM) (n = 9) treated animals. (D) Percent ECM was measured from laminin stained slides. (E) Percent of fibers with centrally located nuclei. (F) Average fiber area. (G) Average fiber circularity. (H) Average fiber roundness. Scale bars are 100 μm and all images are representative from an SKM hydrogel treated animal. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and αp < 0.001 compared to all other groups.
Figure 5Short-Term Histological Assessment of Arteries and Capillaries
Histological analysis taken at (A, C, E, G) day 3 and (B, D, F, H) day 10 post-injection. There were no differences in (A, B) capillary density, (C, D) arteriole density, or (E, F) average arteriole diameter between SKM and saline at these early timepoints, but (E,F) the density of arterioles with diameter >75 μm trended higher in the SKM (n = 6) group compared to saline (n = 6).
Figure 6Short-Term Histological Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Progenitor Cells
(A) Representative image of Pax-7+(red) and Hoechst 33342 (blue) costaining in skeletal muscle matrix (SKM)–injected gracilis muscle. Scale bar is 50 μm and Pax-7+ nuclei are indicated by white arrows. There were significantly more Pax-7+ cells as a percentage of total nuclei in SKM (n = 6) versus saline (n = 6) injected muscles at (B) day 3, but this returned to quiescent levels by (C) day 10. *p = 0.0096. Data from the healthy limb is shown as a reference.
Significantly Altered Pathways in SKM Relative to Saline Injected Muscle at 3 and 10 Days Post-Injection, as Determined by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis
| Category | Annotation | p Value | # Molecules | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 up-regulated pathways | ||||
| Lipid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry | Conversion of lipid | 0.0112 | 1.387 | 5 |
| Cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, hematological system development and function | Proliferation of lymphocytes | 0.0027 | 1.381 | 9 |
| Cell death and survival | Cell survival | 0.0272 | 0.96 | 21 |
| Cellular compromise, inflammatory response | Degranulation of leukocyte cell lines | <0.001 | 0.748 | 8 |
| Cell morphology, cellular function and maintenance | Transmembrane potential of mitochondria | 0.0021 | 0.706 | 9 |
| Cell signaling, molecular transport, vitamin and mineral metabolism | Quantity of Ca2+ | 0.0396 | 0.699 | 16 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | Uptake of monosaccharide | 0.0233 | 0.653 | 8 |
| Cellular function and maintenance | Endocytosis | 0.0075 | 0.555 | 11 |
| Cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, organ development, skeletal and muscular system development and function, tissue development | Proliferation of muscle cells | <0.001 | 0.486 | 22 |
| Cell morphology, skeletal and muscular system development and function | Contractility of muscle cells | 0.0115 | 0.305 | 4 |
| Day 3 down-regulated pathways | ||||
| Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction | Activation of cells | 0.0161 | –2.919 | 15 |
| Cell death and survival | Necrosis | 0.0139 | –2.126 | 58 |
| Cell signaling, post-translational modification | Tyrosine phosphorylation of protein | 0.0401 | –2 | 4 |
| Cell death and survival | Neuronal cell death | 0.0011 | –1.949 | 36 |
| Cardiovascular system development and function, organismal development | Vasculogenesis | 0.0029 | –1.604 | 15 |
| Cell death and survival | Apoptosis | <0.0001 | –1.484 | 75 |
| Cellular movement | Cell movement | <0.001 | –1.39 | 43 |
| Cell Signaling, molecular transport, small molecule biochemistry, vitamin and mineral metabolism | Release of Ca2+ | 0.0486 | –1.154 | 6 |
| Cardiovascular system development and function, organismal development | Angiogenesis | 0.0050 | –1.107 | 19 |
| Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance | Organization of cytoskeleton | 0.0127 | –0.905 | 45 |
| Day 10 up-regulated pathways | ||||
| Cellular movement | Cell movement | 0.0089 | 1.709 | 7 |
| Cellular movement | Migration of cells | 0.0453 | 1.455 | 5 |
| Cardiovascular system development and function, organismal development | Vasculogenesis | 0.0037 | 1 | 4 |
| Cellular growth and proliferation | Proliferation of cells | <0.00001 | 0.986 | 20 |
| Inflammatory response | Inflammatory response | 0.0125 | 0.447 | 5 |
| Cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, nervous system development and function, tissue development | Outgrowth of neurites | <0.001 | 0.447 | 6 |
| Cardiovascular system development and function, organismal development | Angiogenesis | 0.0023 | 0.277 | 5 |
| Day 10 down-regulated pathways | ||||
| Cell death and survival | Cell death | <0.001 | –0.977 | 15 |
| Cell death and survival | Apoptosis | 0.0050 | –0.594 | 11 |