Literature DB >> 27104064

Comparative efficacy of first-line natalizumab vs IFN-β or glatiramer acetate in relapsing MS.

Tim Spelman1, Tomas Kalincik1, Vilija Jokubaitis1, Annie Zhang1, Fabio Pellegrini1, Heinz Wiendl1, Shibeshih Belachew1, Robert Hyde1, Freek Verheul1, Alessandra Lugaresi1, Eva Havrdová1, Dana Horáková1, Pierre Grammond1, Pierre Duquette1, Alexandre Prat1, Gerardo Iuliano1, Murat Terzi1, Guillermo Izquierdo1, Raymond M M Hupperts1, Cavit Boz1, Eugenio Pucci1, Giorgio Giuliani1, Patrizia Sola1, Daniele L A Spitaleri1, Jeannette Lechner-Scott1, Roberto Bergamaschi1, François Grand'Maison1, Franco Granella1, Ludwig Kappos1, Maria Trojano1, Helmut Butzkueven1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared efficacy and treatment persistence in treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) initiating natalizumab compared with interferon-β (IFN-β)/glatiramer acetate (GA) therapies, using propensity score-matched cohorts from observational multiple sclerosis registries.
METHODS: The study population initiated IFN-β/GA in the MSBase Registry or natalizumab in the Tysabri Observational Program, had ≥3 months of on-treatment follow-up, and had active RRMS, defined as ≥1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion on cerebral MRI at baseline or ≥1 relapse within the 12 months prior to baseline. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between propensity-matched groups. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to first relapse, treatment persistence, and disability outcomes were compared between matched treatment arms in the total population (n = 366/group) and subgroups with higher baseline disease activity.
RESULTS: First-line natalizumab was associated with a 68% relative reduction in ARR from a mean (SD) of 0.63 (0.92) on IFN-β/GA to 0.20 (0.63) (p [signed-rank] < 0.0001), a 64% reduction in the rate of first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.47; p < 0.001), and a 27% reduction in the rate of discontinuation (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.93; p = 0.01), compared with first-line IFN-β/GA therapy. Confirmed disability progression and area under the Expanded Disability Status Scale-time curve analyses were not significant. Similar relapse and treatment persistence results were observed in each of the higher disease activity subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Class IV evidence that first-line natalizumab for RRMS improves relapse and treatment persistence outcomes compared to first-line IFN-β/GA. This needs to be balanced against the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that first-line natalizumab for RRMS improves relapse rates and treatment persistence outcomes compared to first-line IFN-β/GA.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27104064      PMCID: PMC4828679          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  36 in total

1.  Benefits of glatiramer acetate on disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An analysis by area under disability/time curves. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group.

Authors:  C Liu; L D Blumhardt
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies.

Authors:  Jeremy A Rassen; Abhi A Shelat; Jessica Myers; Robert J Glynn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H Butzkueven; J Chapman; E Cristiano; F Grand'Maison; M Hoffmann; G Izquierdo; D Jolley; L Kappos; T Leist; D Pöhlau; V Rivera; M Trojano; F Verheul; J P Malkowski
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 6.  First-line natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: rationale, patient selection, benefits and risks.

Authors:  Jacqueline Ann Nicholas; Michael Karl Racke; Jamie Imitola; Aaron Lee Boster
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard A Rudick; William H Stuart; Peter A Calabresi; Christian Confavreux; Steven L Galetta; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Fred D Lublin; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Daniel R Wynn; Frances Lynn; Michael A Panzara; Alfred W Sandrock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG)

Authors:  L D Jacobs; D L Cookfair; R A Rudick; R M Herndon; J R Richert; A M Salazar; J S Fischer; D E Goodkin; C V Granger; J H Simon; J J Alam; D M Bartoszak; D N Bourdette; J Braiman; C M Brownscheidle; M E Coats; S L Cohan; D S Dougherty; R P Kinkel; M K Mass; F E Munschauer; R L Priore; P M Pullicino; B J Scherokman; R H Whitham
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Observational studies and their utility for practice.

Authors:  Julia Fm Gilmartin-Thomas; Danny Liew; Ingrid Hopper
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 3.  Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: emergence of B-cell-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Ai-Lan Nguyen; Melissa Gresle; Tessa Marshall; Helmut Butzkueven; Judith Field
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Long-term registries: Answering tough questions with big data?

Authors:  Robert J Fox; Gary Cutter
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2016-04

Review 5.  Early Aggressive Treatment Approaches for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Simpson; Ellen M Mowry; Scott D Newsome
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Healthcare Costs for Treating Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis and the Risk of Progression: A Retrospective Italian Cohort Study from 2001 to 2015.

Authors:  Marcello Moccia; Raffaele Palladino; Roberta Lanzillo; Antonio Carotenuto; Cinzia Valeria Russo; Maria Triassi; Vincenzo Brescia Morra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations.

Authors:  Gabriel Pardo; David E Jones
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Outcomes of natalizumab treatment within 3 years of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis diagnosis: a prespecified 2-year interim analysis of STRIVE.

Authors:  Jai Perumal; Robert J Fox; Roumen Balabanov; Laura J Balcer; Steven Galetta; Shavy Makh; Sourav Santra; Christophe Hotermans; Lily Lee
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  J William L Brown; Alasdair Coles; Dana Horakova; Eva Havrdova; Guillermo Izquierdo; Alexandre Prat; Marc Girard; Pierre Duquette; Maria Trojano; Alessandra Lugaresi; Roberto Bergamaschi; Pierre Grammond; Raed Alroughani; Raymond Hupperts; Pamela McCombe; Vincent Van Pesch; Patrizia Sola; Diana Ferraro; Francois Grand'Maison; Murat Terzi; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Schlomo Flechter; Mark Slee; Vahid Shaygannejad; Eugenio Pucci; Franco Granella; Vilija Jokubaitis; Mark Willis; Claire Rice; Neil Scolding; Alastair Wilkins; Owen R Pearson; Tjalf Ziemssen; Michael Hutchinson; Katharine Harding; Joanne Jones; Christopher McGuigan; Helmut Butzkueven; Tomas Kalincik; Neil Robertson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  The role of natalizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: benefits and risks.

Authors:  Barry A Singer
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.