BACKGROUND: Fever is one of the most frequently encountered pediatric problems, accounting for 25% of visits to pediatric emergency room. There is no specific standardized approach to reach to a final diagnosis in children with fever as this may be difficult and individualized for each child. The integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) approach is an approach designed to reach a classification rather than a specific diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: Comparison between IMCI and Non-IMCI approaches in management of children with high grade fever≥ 39°. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study carried out on 50 children less than five years old presented with fever ≥ 39° attended the outpatient clinic of Minia university hospital from September 2012 to May 2014. These 50 children divided into 2 groups: group I (25 children) subjected to the (IMCI) approach and group II (25 children) subjected to the traditional approach. RESULTS: Most of children according to the IMCI approach (64%) were classified and diagnosed during the first day, while most of children in traditional approach were diagnosed by the fourth (34%) or fifth day (20%). Sixty percent of children treated according to IMCI approach were improved clinically compared to 12% in traditional approach. Forty percent of children treated according to traditional approach had worse outcomes compared to 16% treated according to the IMCI. CONCLUSION: The IMCI approach can be applied upon children under five years old with high grade fever to reach to a classification, early diagnosis, much better outcomes and less daily cost than the traditional approach.
BACKGROUND:Fever is one of the most frequently encountered pediatric problems, accounting for 25% of visits to pediatric emergency room. There is no specific standardized approach to reach to a final diagnosis in children with fever as this may be difficult and individualized for each child. The integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) approach is an approach designed to reach a classification rather than a specific diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: Comparison between IMCI and Non-IMCI approaches in management of children with high grade fever≥ 39°. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study carried out on 50 children less than five years old presented with fever ≥ 39° attended the outpatient clinic of Minia university hospital from September 2012 to May 2014. These 50 children divided into 2 groups: group I (25 children) subjected to the (IMCI) approach and group II (25 children) subjected to the traditional approach. RESULTS: Most of children according to the IMCI approach (64%) were classified and diagnosed during the first day, while most of children in traditional approach were diagnosed by the fourth (34%) or fifth day (20%). Sixty percent of children treated according to IMCI approach were improved clinically compared to 12% in traditional approach. Forty percent of children treated according to traditional approach had worse outcomes compared to 16% treated according to the IMCI. CONCLUSION: The IMCI approach can be applied upon children under five years old with high grade fever to reach to a classification, early diagnosis, much better outcomes and less daily cost than the traditional approach.
Authors: Honorati Masanja; Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg; Don de Savigny; Hassan Mshinda; Cesar G Victora Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Taghreed Adam; Fatuma Manzi; Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg; Leslie Mgalula; Don de Savigny; David B Evans Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2005-06-24 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Quique Bassat; Sónia Machevo; Cristina O'Callaghan-Gordo; Betuel Sigaúque; Luís Morais; Núria Díez-Padrisa; Josep L Ribó; Inácio Mandomando; Tacilta Nhampossa; Edgar Ayala; Sergi Sanz; Martin Weber; Anna Roca; Pedro L Alonso Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Taghreed Adam; Sally J Edwards; Débora G Amorim; João Amaral; Cesar G Victora; David B Evans Journal: Health Policy Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Shams E Arifeen; D M Emdadul Hoque; Tasnima Akter; Muntasirur Rahman; Mohammad Enamul Hoque; Khadija Begum; Enayet K Chowdhury; Rasheda Khan; Lauren S Blum; Shakil Ahmed; M Altaf Hossain; Ashraf Siddik; Nazma Begum; Qazi Sadeq-ur Rahman; Twaha M Haque; Sk Masum Billah; Mainul Islam; Reza Ali Rumi; Erin Law; Z A Motin Al-Helal; Abdullah H Baqui; Joanna Schellenberg; Taghreed Adam; Lawrence H Moulton; Jean-Pierre Habicht; Robert W Scherpbier; Cesar G Victora; Jennifer Bryce; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joan N Kalyango; Tobias Alfven; Stefan Peterson; Kevin Mugenyi; Charles Karamagi; Elizeus Rutebemberwa Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Funmilayo Shittu; Imaria C Agwai; Adegoke G Falade; Ayobami A Bakare; Hamish Graham; Agnese Iuliano; Zeus Aranda; Eric D McCollum; Adamu Isah; Solomon Bahiru; Tahlil Ahmed; Rochelle A Burgess; Carina King; Tim Colbourn Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2020-01-28
Authors: Joel Dofinissery Bognini; Sekou Samadoulougou; Mady Ouedraogo; Francis Smart; David Tiga Kankoye; Osman Sankoh; Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 3.240