Literature DB >> 27102341

Expression of c-Fos in rat auditory and limbic systems following 22-kHz calls.

Ladislav Ouda1, Milan Jílek2, Josef Syka2.   

Abstract

In the present study, adult Long-Evans rats were exposed either to natural conspecific aversive 22-kHz vocalizations or to artificial call-like stimuli with comparable frequency-temporal features, followed by c-Fos immunohistochemistry. The natural 22-kHz vocalizations was either played from a recording or produced by a foot-shocked animal located nearby (live vocalizations). In comparison with controls (non-exposed animals), c-Fos immunoreactivity was significantly increased in the inferior colliculus (IC), auditory cortex (AC), periaqueductal grey (PAG), basolateral amygdala (BA), and hippocampus (Hip) of rats exposed to either live or recorded 22-kHz natural vocalizations. Exposure to live natural vocalizations of the foot-shocked animal resulted in a similar pattern of c-Fos activity, as did exposure to the playback of the natural vocalizations. In contrast to this, foot-shocked rats (emitting the 22-kHz vocalizations) had the c-Fos positivity increased markedly in the PAG and only slightly in the AC. The expression of c-Fos also increased in the IC, AC, and in the PAG in animals exposed to the artificial call-like stimuli, when compared to controls; however, the increase was much less pronounced. In this case, c-Fos expression was not increased in the hippocampus or basolateral amygdala. Interestingly, almost no c-Fos expression was found in the medial nucleus of the geniculate body in any of the experimental groups. These findings suggest that differences exist between the processing of important natural conspecific vocalizations and artificial call-like stimuli with similar frequency-temporal features, and moreover they suggest the specific role of individual brain structures in the processing of such calls.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial; Hearing; Ultrasonic vocalization (USV); c-Fos expression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27102341     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

Review 1.  An insular view of the social decision-making network.

Authors:  Morgan M Rogers-Carter; John P Christianson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  22 kHz and 55 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations differentially influence neural and behavioral outcomes: Implications for modeling anxiety via auditory stimuli in the rat.

Authors:  Camila Demaestri; Heather C Brenhouse; Jennifer A Honeycutt
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Evidence for a vocal signature in the rat and its reinforcing effects: a key role for the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Cassandre Vielle; Christian Montanari; Yann Pelloux; Christelle Baunez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Cerebellar modulation of memory encoding in the periaqueductal grey and fear behaviour.

Authors:  Charlotte Lawrenson; Elena Paci; Jasmine Pickford; Robert A R Drake; Bridget M Lumb; Richard Apps
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Stressed rats fail to exhibit avoidance reactions to innately aversive social calls.

Authors:  Ashutosh Shukla; Sumantra Chattarji
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 8.294

6.  Vocal sequences suppress spiking in the bat auditory cortex while evoking concomitant steady-state local field potentials.

Authors:  Julio C Hechavarría; M Jerome Beetz; Silvio Macias; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Call-specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson's ground squirrel alarm calls.

Authors:  Angela R Freeman; James F Hare; Heather K Caldwell
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Acoustical cues for perception of emotional vocalizations in rats.

Authors:  Yumi Saito; Ryosuke O Tachibana; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Effect of Noise Trauma and Deep Brain Stimulation of the Medial Geniculate Body on Tissue Activity in the Auditory Pathway.

Authors:  Faris Almasabi; Gusta van Zwieten; Faisal Alosaimi; Jasper V Smit; Yasin Temel; Marcus L F Janssen; Ali Jahanshahi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 10.  Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Authors:  Constanze Lenschow; Ana Rita P Mendes; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.