Literature DB >> 27102321

The effect of a core exercise program on Cobb angle and back muscle activity in male students with functional scoliosis: a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, comparative study.

Yun Hee Park1, Young Sook Park2, Yong Taek Lee3, Hee Suk Shin4, Min-Kyun Oh4, Jiyeon Hong5, Kyoung Yul Lee6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of core strengthening exercises on Cobb angle and muscle activity in male college students with functional scoliosis.
METHODS: Static and dynamic back muscle activity were evaluated via surface electromyography (sEMG). A core exercise protocol comprising 18 exercises was performed three times/week for 10 weeks. Patients were randomly allocated to either a home- or community-based exercise programme. Cervical thoracolumbar scans and sEMG were performed after 10 weeks.
RESULTS: A total of 87 students underwent cervical thoracolumbar scans. Of these, 53 were abnormal and were randomised between the home-based (n = 25) or community-based (n = 28) groups. After the 10-week exercise programme, Cobb angles were significantly lower and back muscle strength was significantly improved than baseline in both groups, but there were no statistically significant between group differences.
CONCLUSIONS: A 10-week core strengthening exercise programme decreases Cobb angle and improves back muscle strength in patients with functional scoliosis.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cobb angle; Scoliosis; cervical thoracolumbar scans; college students; core exercise; surface electromyography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27102321      PMCID: PMC5536699          DOI: 10.1177/0300060516639750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


Introduction

Gravitational forces move along the spine and may cause changes in posture that can lead to postural deformity including scoliosis, lordosis and kyphosis.[1,2] Scoliosis is the most common type of spinal curvature disorder, and is classified as structural or functional depending upon whether or not the change is fixed.[3] The key factor in functional scoliosis is the reversibility of abnormal curvature by various positions and movements.[4] Scoliosis is diagnosed via cervical thoracolumbar X-ray scanography, viewed while the patient is standing.[5] The effects of exercise in patients with structural scoliosis have been well documented,[6-12] but there are limited data available regarding the effects of exercise in the treatment of functional scoliosis.[3] Clinical evidence supports the use of core strengthening exercises in the treatment and prevention of lower back pain and other musculoskeletal disorders.[13] The present study evaluated the effect of a 10-week core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength in male college students with functional scoliosis. Patients were randomized to perform the exercise programme in either a home-based or community group-based setting.

Patients and methods

Study population

The study recruited male college students who applied to undertake a core exercise programme at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea between 2 June 2014 and 29 August 2014. Students with evidence of dorsolumbar scoliosis as indicated by the Adam's forward bend test were eligible for inclusion in the study.[14] Exclusion criteria were: previous spinal surgery; neurological or rheumatic disease; contraindication to exercise/physical activity. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Patient assessments

Degree of scoliosis was evaluated via the Cobb method,[15] and a medical technician blinded to study conditions performed cervical thoracolumbar X-ray scanography on all patients. Static and dynamic back muscle activity was evaluated by surface electromyography (sEMG; MyoVision, Seattle, WA, USA) in all patients with abnormal scan results. Data are reported in microvolts (0.08 – 200 µV) and represent the amplitude of muscle activity over time. Static scanning was performed using three pairs of sEMG electrodes applied bilaterally to the skin overlying the paraspinal muscle region at level T7, T12 and L3 with the patient in a relaxed standing position. Symmetricity was determined by the ratio of right to left static activity. Dynamic sEMG (muscle strength) was recorded from L1 and L5 paraspinal muscles with the patient bending at 90° from the vertical.

Core exercise programme

Patients were randomized via computer-based programme to either a home-based exercise programme or a community group-based exercise programme. The 50-min exercise programme was identical in both groups, and was to be performed three times/week for 10 weeks. Details of the exercise programme are shown in Table 1. In brief, the programme comprised warm-up stretching exercises (10 min), 18 main exercises (30 min), and cool-down stretching exercises (10 min). All participants were trained initially in the gymnasium. Patients in the home-based programme received an exercise video and were periodically telephoned by an instructor. Patients in the community group-based programme completed all exercises together in the gymnasium under direct supervision of an instructor.
Table 1.

Core strengthening exercise programme for male patients with functional scoliosis.

SectionExercise typeDuration
Warm upStretching10 min
Main exercise1. Basic crunch 2. Knees up crunch 3. Compound crunch 4. Crossed leg crunch 5. Sky reachers 6. Bicycles 7. Crossed leg raisers 8. Hip raisers 9. Rowers 10. Single/double leg V ups 11. Oblique crunches 12. Cross limb superman 13. Superman 14. Cat back raises 15. Knees to elbows 16. Stable arm reachers 17. Sideways crawl 18. Hand walkouts30 min
Cool downStretching10 min
Core strengthening exercise programme for male patients with functional scoliosis. Cobb angle and sEMG were assessed at baseline and after 10 weeks. Due to the nature of the intervention, research staff and participants could not be blinded to the type of exercise programme, but the physician who assessed outcome measures was blinded to the exercise regimen.

Statistical analyses

Sample size was determined via a pilot study with a maximum of five patients per group. The mean ± SD difference in Cobb angle was 2.0 ± 2.8 and 4.5 ± 3.4 in the home-based and community-based groups, respectively. A total sample size of 52 (26 per group) was therefore required (α = 0.05, power 80%). Assuming a dropout rate of 10%, the final sample size was increased to 58 (29 in each group). Data were presented as mean ± SD. Between group differences in Cobb angle and muscle activity were analysed using mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows®. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The study screened 276 male college students, 189 of whom did not meet the inclusion criteria. Cervical thoracolumbar scanography was performed on the remaining 87 patients. A total of 53 patients had abnormal scans and were eligible for randomization (n = 25 home-based programme; n = 28 community-based programme). A total of two patients were lost to follow-up, and the final analysis included 51 patients (n = 23 home-based programme; n = 28 community-based programme). A chart indicating the flow of patients through the study is shown in Figure 1. Baseline demographic data are shown in Table 2. There were no significant between-group differences in age, height, weight or body mass index.
Figure 1.

Flow chart indicating recruitment, randomization, and follow-up of patients with functional scoliosis included in a study to compare the effects of a home-based or community group-based 10-week core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength.

Table 2.

Baseline demographic characteristics of male patients with functional scoliosis included in a study evaluating the effect of a home- or community-based core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength.

CharacteristicHome-based programme n = 23Community- based programme n = 28
Age, years20.0 ± 2.020.6 ± 1.8
Height, cm174.4 ± 6.0173.7 ± 6.3
Weight, kg70.2 ± 9.370.4 ± 7.3
Body mass index, kg/m222.9 ± 2.523.4 ± 2.8

Data presented as mean ± SD.

No statistically significant between-group differences (P ≥ 0.05; mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance).

Flow chart indicating recruitment, randomization, and follow-up of patients with functional scoliosis included in a study to compare the effects of a home-based or community group-based 10-week core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength. Baseline demographic characteristics of male patients with functional scoliosis included in a study evaluating the effect of a home- or community-based core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength. Data presented as mean ± SD. No statistically significant between-group differences (P ≥ 0.05; mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance). Data regarding Cobb angle and sEMG parameters are shown in Table 3. After 10 weeks of exercise, Cobb angle was significantly lower than baseline in both groups (P < 0.001), but there was no significant between-group difference. Muscle strength (dynamic sEMG) was significantly improved at 10 weeks compared with baseline (P = 0.029), but there was no significant difference between the groups. The exercise programme had no significant effect on static sEMG (back muscle symmetry at T7, T12, and L3; Table 3).
Table 3.

Effect of a 10-week home- or community-based core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength in male patients with functional scoliosis.

ParameterHome-based programme n = 23Community-based programme n = 28Statistical significance[a]
Time effectGroup effectTime/Group Interaction
Cobb angle, °P < 0.001NSP < 0.001
 Baseline9.12 ± 2.269.58 ± 2.66
  10 weeks7.07 ± 3.014.33 ± 2.45
T7 symmetryNSNSNS
 Baseline1.70 ± 1.372.26 ± 3.18
  10 weeks2.69 ± 4.795.17 ± 11.39
T12 symmetryNSNSNS
 Baseline1.32 ± 0.791.58 ± 1.15
  10 weeks1.54 ± 1.301.76 ± 2.49
L3 symmetryNSNSNS
 Baseline1.37 ± 0.781.79 ± 2.59
  10 weeks1.92 ± 3.392.71 ± 4.84
Muscle strength, µVP = 0.029NSNS
 Baseline153.56 ± 35.93144.21 ± 28.03
  10 weeks157.28 ± 33.19160.94 ± 29.30

Data presented as mean ± SD.

Mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

Effect of a 10-week home- or community-based core strengthening exercise programme on Cobb angle and back muscle strength in male patients with functional scoliosis. Data presented as mean ± SD. Mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

Discussion

The use of core strengthening exercises to sustain the functional stability of the spine by strengthening the abdominal and lumbar muscles was first proposed in the 1970s.[13,16] This type of exercise contributes greatly to the rehabilitation of injured sportsmen and women.[17] Although opinions differ about the most effective exercises to use,[18] the common objective of core stability training is to recondition the muscles that stabilize the spine by improving lumbar muscle endurance.[19] Exercise such as yoga and Tai Chi have been shown to reduce the severity of functional scoliosis, correct posture, and improve balance.[3,20] Core exercise can correct misalignment of the spine via improvement of neuromuscular control and the strength and endurance of a number of muscles in the trunk and pelvic floor that are believed to play important roles in spinal stability and arrangement.[21] The present study investigated the impact of core strengthening exercise on functional scoliosis by examining changes in Cobb angle and paraspinal muscle activity using scanography and sEMG. We found that both home-based and community group-based exercise reduced Cobb angle and improved muscle strength, with no significant between group differences observed. This finding was surprising since we expected that the home-based exercise programme would be less effective than the community group-based programme because of problems with compliance. The outcome may have been affected by the small study population, which did not reach our calculated minimum sample size. Further large scale and long term studies are required to confirm our findings. In addition, sEMG did not provide any meaningful results regarding symmetry of the spinal muscles, possibly due to a poor relationship between static sEMG and symmetry of the back muscles and/or limitations in detecting muscle fibre currents. It is possible that needle electrodes may be more effective than surface electrodes at detecting deep muscle activity. Since abdominal muscle strength is also important for spinal arrangement during the core exercise, moitoring of these muscles would have provided additional valuable data. A further limitation of our study was the lack of a control group. It was assumed that patients who did not exercise would not improve, leading to concerns for the ethics committee. The study was therefore comparative, investigating the effects of two settings for the exercise programme. In conclusion, both a home-based and a community group-based 10-week core strengthening exercise programme decreased Cobb angle and improved back muscle activity in male patients with functional scoliosis. This core strengthening exercise protocol may be used to minimise the degree of scoliosis and improve back muscle strength in patients with functional scoliosis.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of exercise therapy for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Simon C Mordecai; Harshad V Dabke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Core stability exercise principles.

Authors:  Venu Akuthota; Andrea Ferreiro; Tamara Moore; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 3.  The myth of core stability.

Authors:  Eyal Lederman
Journal:  J Bodyw Mov Ther       Date:  2010-01

Review 4.  Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review.

Authors:  David Malfair; Anne K Flemming; Marcel F Dvorak; Peter L Munk; Alexandra T Vertinsky; Manraj K Heran; Doug A Graeb
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the possible harm of bracing and the likely benefit of exercise.

Authors:  Bareket Falk; W Alan Rigby; Nasreen Akseer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  The efficacy of three-dimensional Schroth exercises in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Tuğba Kuru; İpek Yeldan; E Elçin Dereli; Arzu R Özdinçler; Fatih Dikici; İlker Çolak
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.477

7.  Spinal Stabilization Exercise Effectiveness for Low Back Pain in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Karina Amani Zapata; Sharon S Wang-Price; Daniel J Sucato; Mary Thompson; Elaine Trudelle-Jackson; Venita Lovelace-Chandler
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.049

8.  Spinal screening for scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis.

Authors:  G F Rapp
Journal:  J Indiana State Med Assoc       Date:  1978-01

Review 9.  Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. The Nottingham concept.

Authors:  R G Burwell; A A Cole; T A Cook; T B Grivas; A W Kiel; A Moulton; A S Thirlwall; S S Upadhyay; J K Webb; S A Wemyss-Holden
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.500

10.  Does pilates-based exercise improve postural alignment in adult women?

Authors:  Ana Cruz-Ferreira; Jorge Fernandes; Yi-Liang Kuo; Lisa Marie Bernardo; Orlando Fernandes; Luís Laranjo; António Silva
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2013
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Schroth method and core stabilization exercises on idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanja Dimitrijević; Dejan Viduka; Tijana Šćepanović; Nebojša Maksimović; Valerio Giustino; Antonino Bianco; Patrik Drid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  H-reflex changes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat; Ehab Mohamed Abdel-Kafy; Ashraf Mohamed Abdelaal
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-09-15

3.  Effects of 12-week core stabilization exercise on the Cobb angle and lumbar muscle strength of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Kwang-Jun Ko; Seol-Jung Kang
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-30

4.  Effects of Core Stabilization Training on the Cobb Angle and Pulmonary Function in Adolescent Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Kexin Qi; Haidong Fu; Zhen Yang; Lingqi Bao; Yinxin Shao
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-07-31

5.  Evaluation of the association between postural control and sagittal curvature of the spine.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Łukaz Żurawski; Wojciech Piotr Kiebzak; Ireneusz M Kowalski; Grzegorz Śliwiński; Zbigniew Śliwiński
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.