Literature DB >> 27102289

Comparison of time required for traditional versus virtual orthognathic surgery treatment planning.

M K Wrzosek1, Z S Peacock2, A Laviv1, B R Goldwaser1, R Ortiz1, C M Resnick1, M J Troulis1, L B Kaban1.   

Abstract

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is a tool for predicting complex surgical movements in three dimensions and it may reduce preoperative laboratory time. A prospective study to compare the time required for standard preoperative planning versus VSP was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital from January 2014 through January 2015. Workflow data for bimaxillary cases planned by both standard techniques and VSP were recorded in real time. Time spent was divided into three parts: (1) obtaining impressions, face-bow mounting, and model preparation; (2) occlusal analysis and modification, model surgery, and splint fabrication; (3) online VSP session. Average times were compared between standard treatment planning (sum of parts 1 and 2) and VSP (sum of parts 1 and 3). Of 41 bimaxillary cases included, 20 were simple (symmetric) and 21 were complex (asymmetry and segmental osteotomies). Average times for parts 1, 2, and 3 were 4.43, 3.01, and 0.67h, respectively. The average time required for standard treatment planning was 7.45h and for VSP was 5.10h, a 31% time reduction (P<0.001). By eliminating all or some components of part 1, time savings may increase to as much as 91%. This study indicates that in an academic setting, VSP reduces the time required for treatment planning of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery cases.
Copyright © 2016 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  model surgery; orthognathic surgery; resident work-hours; splint construction; virtual surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27102289     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  9 in total

1.  Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Daniel Schneider; Peer W Kämmerer; Matthias Hennig; Gerhard Schön; Daniel G E Thiem; Reinhard Bschorer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement and Simultaneous Orthognathic Surgery Using Computer-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Natalia Lucia Gomez; Luis Alejandro Boccalatte; Águeda Lopez Ruiz; María Gabriela Nassif; Marcelo Fernando Figari; Lucas Ritacco
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-23

3.  Point-of-care computer-assisted design and manufacturing technology and its utility in post-traumatic mandibular reconstruction: An Australian public hospital experience.

Authors:  Aaron C Kovacs; Tran-Lee Kaing
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  On the use of intraoperative 3D-RX C-arm imaging in orthognathic surgery: a prospective non-consecutive case series study.

Authors:  Nikolas K G De Meurechy; Christopher Decoste; Maurice Y Mommaerts
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-10-24

5.  Virtual Surgical Planning Decreases Operative Time for Isolated Single Suture and Multi-suture Craniosynostosis Repair.

Authors:  Tom W Andrew; Joseph Baylan; Paul A Mittermiller; Homan Cheng; Dana N Johns; Michael S B Edwards; Sam H Cheshier; Gerald A Grant; H Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-17

6.  Comparison of time and cost between conventional surgical planning and virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery in Korea.

Authors:  Si-Yeon Park; Dae-Seok Hwang; Jae-Min Song; Uk-Kyu Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-09-12

7.  Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ali Alkhayer; József Piffkó; Carsten Lippold; Emil Segatto
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Integrating maxillary dentition and 3D facial photo using a modified CAD/CAM facebow.

Authors:  Peiqi Wang; Hui Xu; Rui Gu; Liwei Zhu; Ding Bai; Chaoran Xue
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Comparison of time and cost between conventional surgical planning and virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery in Korea.

Authors:  Si-Yeon Park; Dae-Seok Hwang; Jae-Min Song; Uk-Kyu Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-06-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.