Literature DB >> 27102020

Prevalence of Pragmatically Defined High CV Risk and its Correlates in LMIC: A Report From 10 LMIC Areas in Africa, Asia, and South America.

Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco1, J Jaime Miranda2, Xian Li3, Chendi Cui4, Xiaolin Xu5, Mohammed Ali6, Dewan S Alam7, Thomas A Gaziano8, Rajeev Gupta9, Vilma Irazola10, Naomi S Levitt11, Dorairaj Prabhakaran12, Adolfo Rubinstein10, Krisela Steyn13, Nikhil Tandon6, Denis Xavier14, Yangfeng Wu15, Lijing L Yan16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently available tools for assessing high cardiovascular risk (HCR) often require measurements not available in resource-limited settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). There is a need to assess HCR using a pragmatic evidence-based approach.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report the prevalence of HCR in 10 LMIC areas in Africa, Asia, and South America and to investigate the profiles and correlates of HCR.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-UnitedHealth Group Centers of Excellence. HCR was defined as history of heart disease/heart attack, history of stroke, older age (≥50 years for men and ≥60 for women) with history of diabetes, or older age with systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg. Prevalence estimates were standardized to the World Health Organization's World Standard Population.
RESULTS: A total of 37,067 subjects ages ≥35 years were included; 53.7% were women and mean age was 53.5 ± 12.1 years. The overall age-standardized prevalence of HCR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval: 15.0% to 15.7%), ranging from 8.3% (India, Bangalore) to 23.4% (Bangladesh). Among men, the prevalence was 1.7% for the younger age group (35 to 49 years) and 29.1% for the older group (≥50); among women, 3.8% for the younger group (35 to 59 years) and 40.7% for the older group (≥60). Among the older group, measured systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg (with or without other conditions) was the most common criterion for having HCR, followed by diabetes. The proportion of having met more than 1 criterion was nearly 20%. Age, education, and body mass index were significantly associated with HCR. Cross-site differences existed and were attenuated after adjusting for age, sex, education, smoking, and body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HCR in 10 LMIC areas was generally high. This study provides a starting point to define targeted populations that may benefit from interventions combining both primary and secondary prevention strategies.
Copyright © 2016 World Heart Federation (Geneva). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27102020      PMCID: PMC4843819          DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Heart


  50 in total

1.  Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; S Grundy; L M Sullivan; P Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson; Harmon S Jordan; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Duration of diabetes and risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study.

Authors:  Chirantan Banerjee; Yeseon P Moon; Myunghee C Paik; Tatjana Rundek; Consuelo Mora-McLaughlin; Julio R Vieira; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Impact of age on the importance of systolic and diastolic blood pressures for stroke risk: the MOnica, Risk, Genetics, Archiving, and Monograph (MORGAM) Project.

Authors:  Julie K K Vishram; Anders Borglykke; Anne H Andreasen; Jørgen Jeppesen; Hans Ibsen; Torben Jørgensen; Grazyna Broda; Luigi Palmieri; Simona Giampaoli; Chiara Donfrancesco; Frank Kee; Giuseppe Mancia; Giancarlo Cesana; Kari Kuulasmaa; Susana Sans; Michael H Olsen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Sumathy Rangarajan; Koon Teo; Shofiqul Islam; Wei Li; Lisheng Liu; Jian Bo; Qinglin Lou; Fanghong Lu; Tianlu Liu; Liu Yu; Shiying Zhang; Prem Mony; Sumathi Swaminathan; Viswanathan Mohan; Rajeev Gupta; Rajesh Kumar; Krishnapillai Vijayakumar; Scott Lear; Sonia Anand; Andreas Wielgosz; Rafael Diaz; Alvaro Avezum; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Fernando Lanas; Khalid Yusoff; Noorhassim Ismail; Romaina Iqbal; Omar Rahman; Annika Rosengren; Afzalhussein Yusufali; Roya Kelishadi; Annamarie Kruger; Thandi Puoane; Andrzej Szuba; Jephat Chifamba; Aytekin Oguz; Matthew McQueen; Martin McKee; Gilles Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Stroke risk in systolic and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension determined using ambulatory blood pressure. The Ohasama study.

Authors:  Ryusuke Inoue; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; Hirohito Metoki; Kei Asayama; Taku Obara; Takuo Hirose; Azusa Hara; Haruhisa Hoshi; Junichiro Hashimoto; Kazuhito Totsune; Hiroshi Satoh; Yoshiaki Kondo; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Three-year survival and stroke recurrence rates in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Elisabet Zia; Gunnar Engström; Peter J Svensson; Bo Norrving; Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Cardiovascular risk factors in semi-urban communities in southwest Nigeria: Patterns and prevalence.

Authors:  Rotimi Oluyombo; Michael A Olamoyegun; Oluwasegun Olaifa; Sandra O Iwuala; Oluwole A Babatunde
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2014-09-02

10.  Population impact of a high cardiovascular risk management program delivered by village doctors in rural China: design and rationale of a large, cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lijing L Yan; Weigang Fang; Elizabeth Delong; Bruce Neal; Eric D Peterson; Yining Huang; Ningling Sun; Chen Yao; Xian Li; Stephen MacMahon; Yangfeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  4 in total

1.  Capsule Commentary on Chiu et al. BMI Trajectories as a Harbinger of Pre-Diabetes or Underdiagnosed Diabetes: An 18-Year Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Rupam Ruchi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Rheumatic heart disease knowledge and associated factors among nurses working in cardiac centers at public and private hospitals of Addis Ababa: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Tesfaye Techane; Bethlehem Legesse; Yohannes Ayalew; Aklil Hailu
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Cardiovascular risk factor reduction by community health workers in rural India: A cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Rajnish Joshi; Twinkle Agrawal; Farah Fathima; Thammattoor Usha; Tinku Thomas; Dominic Misquith; Shriprakash Kalantri; Natesan Chidambaram; Tony Raj; Alben Singamani; Shailendra Hegde; Denis Xavier; P J Devereaux; Prem Pais; Rajeev Gupta; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Sex differences in non-communicable disease prevalence in China: a cross-sectional analysis of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2011.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Guofeng Liu; Hongjiang Wu; Weiyan Jian; Sarah H Wild; Danijela Gasevic
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.