Literature DB >> 27101886

Random monoallelic expression of genes on autosomes: Parallels with X-chromosome inactivation.

Anne-Valerie Gendrel1, Lucile Marion-Poll2, Kimiko Katoh2, Edith Heard3.   

Abstract

Genes are generally expressed from their two alleles, except in some particular cases such as random inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in female mammals or imprinted genes which are expressed only from the maternal or the paternal allele. A lesser-known phenomenon is random monoallelic expression (RME) of autosomal genes, where genes can be stably expressed in a monoallelic manner, from either one of the parental alleles. Studies on autosomal RME face several challenges. First, RME that is based on epigenetic mechanisms has to be distinguished from biased expression of one allele caused by a DNA sequence polymorphism in a regulatory element. Second, RME should not be confused with transient monoallelic expression often observed in single cell analyses, and that often corresponds to dynamic bursting of expression. Thanks to analyses on clonal cell populations, the existence of RME in cultured cells is now well established. Future studies of RME in vivo will have to overcome tissue heterogeneity and certain technical limitations. Here, we discuss current knowledge on autosomal RME, as well as possible mechanisms controlling these expression patterns and potential implications for development and disease, drawing parallels with what is known for X-chromosome inactivation, a paradigm of random monoallelic expression.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Autosomal dominant disease; Development; Epigenetics; Random monoallelic expression; X-chromosome inactivation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27101886     DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  20 in total

1.  Landscape of monoallelic DNA accessibility in mouse embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Ava C Carter; Anne-Valerie Gendrel; Mikael Attia; Joshua Loftus; William J Greenleaf; Robert Tibshirani; Edith Heard; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Binary outcomes of enhancer activity underlie stable random monoallelic expression.

Authors:  Djem U Kissiov; Alexander Ethell; Sean Chen; Natalie K Wolf; Chenyu Zhang; Susanna M Dang; Yeara Jo; Katrine N Madsen; Ishan Paranjpe; Angus Y Lee; Bryan Chim; Stefan A Muljo; David H Raulet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 3.  Cell-to-cell variation in gene expression and the aging process.

Authors:  Alexander R Mendenhall; George M Martin; Matt Kaeberlein; Rozalyn M Anderson
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 7.581

Review 4.  The emerging landscape of in vitro and in vivo epigenetic allelic effects.

Authors:  Christopher Gregg
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-07

5.  Gene silencing and a novel monoallelic expression pattern in distinct CD177 neutrophil subsets.

Authors:  Claudia Eulenberg-Gustavus; Sylvia Bähring; Philipp G Maass; Friedrich C Luft; Ralph Kettritz
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  L1 retrotransposon antisense RNA within ASAR lncRNAs controls chromosome-wide replication timing.

Authors:  Emily J Platt; Leslie Smith; Mathew J Thayer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Frequent monoallelic or skewed expression for developmental genes in CNS-derived cells and evidence for balancing selection.

Authors:  Sergio Branciamore; Zuzana Valo; Min Li; Jinhui Wang; Arthur D Riggs; Judith Singer-Sam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Replicate sequencing libraries are important for quantification of allelic imbalance.

Authors:  Asia Mendelevich; Svetlana Vinogradova; Saumya Gupta; Andrey A Mironov; Shamil R Sunyaev; Alexander A Gimelbrant
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Viable Ednra Y129F mice feature human mandibulofacial dysostosis with alopecia (MFDA) syndrome due to the homologue mutation.

Authors:  Sibylle Sabrautzki; Michael A Sandholzer; Bettina Lorenz-Depiereux; Robert Brommage; Gerhard Przemeck; Ingrid L Vargas Panesso; Alexandra Vernaleken; Lillian Garrett; Katharina Baron; Ali O Yildirim; Jan Rozman; Birgit Rathkolb; Christine Gau; Wolfgang Hans; Sabine M Hoelter; Susan Marschall; Claudia Stoeger; Lore Becker; Helmut Fuchs; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Martin Klingenspor; Thomas Klopstock; Christoph Lengger; Leuchtenberger Stefanie; Eckhard Wolf; Tim M Strom; Wolfgang Wurst; Martin Hrabě de Angelis
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Two approaches reveal a new paradigm of 'switchable or genetics-influenced allele-specific DNA methylation' with potential in human disease.

Authors:  Suzanne N Martos; Teng Li; Ramon Bossardi Ramos; Dan Lou; Hongzheng Dai; Jin-Chong Xu; Ganglong Gao; Yang Gao; Qinglu Wang; Cheng An; Xueli Zhang; Yankai Jia; Valina L Dawson; Ted M Dawson; Hongkai Ji; Zhibin Wang
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 10.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.