Literature DB >> 27101581

Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial.

Fariba Yarandi1, Azamsadat Mousavi, Fereshteh Abbaslu, Soheila Aminimoghaddam, Sepideh Nekuie, Khadijeh Adabi, Parviz Hanjani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) and Actinomycin-D (Act-D) are effective drugs used in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTNs). The aim of the present study was to compare intravenous (IV) MTX and IV Act-D in the treatment of LRGTNs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with LRGTN were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2010 and 2013 in Moheb e Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Primary treatment regimens were IV MTX, 0.4 mg/kg daily for 5 days every 14 days (25 mg maximum daily dose), and IV Act-D, 1.25 mg/m (2 mg maximum dose) every 14 days.
RESULTS: Thirty-two and 30 patients were enrolled to MTX and Act-D groups, respectively. Complete remission after receiving first-line chemotherapy was achieved in 79% of all cases, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in the MTX group.Twenty percent of the Act-D patients and 21.9% of the MTX patients showed resistance to the first-line chemotherapy, of which 16.7% and 15.6% responded completely to the second-line monotherapy, respectively. Multiple drug therapy was needed in 3.3% of the Act-D group and 6.3% of the MTX group.We did not find any correlation between treatment response and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level, uterine mass size, lung metastasis, antecedent pregnancy, and duration from diagnosis to treatment. Adverse effects were not statistically different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of LRGTNs resulted in an overall complete remission rate of 79%, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in MTX group, with no statistically significant difference. Whereas this study represents an important step in comparing single-agent treatments, comparison of other regimens will be required to determine the optimal single-agent therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27101581     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic chemotherapy for hydatidiform mole to prevent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Qiuyi Wang; Jing Fu; Lina Hu; Fang Fang; Lingxia Xie; Hengxi Chen; Fan He; Taixiang Wu; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-11

2.  Outcome of treatment with EMA/EP (etoposide methotrexate and actinomycin-D/ etoposide and cisplatin) regimen in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Soheila Aminimoghaddam; Forough Nezhadisalami; Shabnam Anjidani; Saeedeh Barzin Tond
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2018-05-03

3.  Prophylactic Chemotherapy with Methotrexate Leucovorin in High-Risk Hydatidiform Mole.

Authors:  Soheila Aminimoghaddam; Fatemeh Mahmoudzadeh; Marzieh Mohammadi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Direct comparisons of efficacy and safety between actinomycin-D and methotrexate in women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized and high-quality non-randomized studies.

Authors:  Jiatao Hao; Weihua Zhou; Mengzhao Zhang; Hui Yu; Taohong Zhang; Ruifang An; Yan Xue
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Differences in Administration of Methotrexate and Impact on Outcome in Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Emelie Wallin; Isa Niemann; Louise Faaborg; Lars Fokdal; Ulrika Joneborg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.