| Literature DB >> 27101370 |
Tarlan Mamedov1, Jessica A Chichester1, R Mark Jones1, Ananya Ghosh1, Megan V Coffin1, Kristina Herschbach1, Alexey I Prokhnevsky1, Stephen J Streatfield1, Vidadi Yusibov1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27101370 PMCID: PMC4839623 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1SDS-PAGE analysis of purified pp-PA83 variants.
Lanes were loaded with 1.75 μg per lane. M: molecular weight markers, A: pp-dPA83 (in vivo deglycosylated), B: glycosylated pp-PA83, C: in vitro deglycosylated pp-PA83, D: pp-PA83M-Q mutant, E: pp-PA83M-D mutant. The arrowhead in lane C indicates migration of PNGase F.
Fig 2Glycan detection and Western blot analysis of glycosylated and deglycosylated pp-PA83 variants.
(A) 0.25 μg of protein from each sample was run on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by in-gel glycan detection using the Pro-Q Emerald 300 glycoprotein staining kit. Stained proteins were visualized by UV illumination. Lanes: 1 –pp-PA83 treated with commercial PNGase F in vitro, 2 –glycosylated pp-PA83, 3 –pp-dPA83 treated with commercial PNGase F in vitro, 4 –pp-dPA83. (B) Western blot analysis of the same samples using an anti-4xHis tag mAb. M1: CandyCane glycoprotein molecular weight standards (Molecular Probes), 250 ng of each protein per lane; M2: MagicMark XP Western Protein Standard (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY).
Fig 3Stability of glycosylated and deglycosylated pp-PA83 variants.
pp-PA83 variants were stored for 1 hour at 37°C or for 72 hours at 4°C and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. M: molecular weight markers. Lanes were loaded with ~0.7 μg per lane for in vivo deglycosylated pp-PA83 (pp-dPA83) and glycosylated pp-PA83 and with ~1.6 μg per lane for the pp-PA83M-D and pp-PA83M-Q mutated versions.
Binding activity analysis of pp-mAbPANG to pp-PA83 variants.
| Protein | Treatment | Glycosylated | kon (1/Ms) | koff (1/s) | KD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pp-PA83 | none | Yes | 1.37 x 105 | 1.87 x 10−3 | 1.36 x 10−8 |
| pp-PA83 | No | 1.45 x 105 | 2.22 x 10−3 | 1.53 x 10−8 | |
| pp-dPA83 | No | 6.86 x 104 | 9.94 x 10−4 | 1.45 x 10−8 | |
| pp-PA83M-D | mutant | No | 1.34 x 105 | 5.30 x 10−4 | 3.95 x 10−9 |
| pp-PA83M-Q | mutant | No | 5.92 x 104 | 6.16 x 10−4 | 1.04 x 10−8 |
a KD represents a calculated value (koff ÷ kon).
LeTx forming assay results for pp-PA83 variants.
| Protein | Treatment | Glycosylated | EC50 (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| rPA | N/A | No | 144 |
| pp-PA83 | none | Yes | nd |
| pp-PA83 | No | 289 | |
| pp-dPA83 | No | 187 | |
| pp-PA83M-D | mutant | No | nd |
| pp-PA83M-Q | mutant | No | 916 |
a recombinant PA from B. anthracis
N/A: not applicable
nd: not detected
Fig 4IgG responses in mice elicited by pp-PA83 variants using Alhydrogel as an adjuvant.
IgG titers were determined by ELISA in sera collected on multiple days post vaccination from mice immunized with one of the four pp-PA83 variants. Reciprocal serum dilutions that gave a mean OD value greater than 4-fold over background were determined as the end point titers. Data are shown as the geometric mean serum IgG end point titers per group ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance (p<0.05) was calculated using the Mann-Whitney test.
Fig 5TNA responses elicited by the different variants of pp-PA83 in mice.
Mice were immunized on study days 0, 21 and 42 IM with 10 μg (solid symbols) or 3 μg (open symbols) of pp-PA83 protein adsorbed to 0.3% Alhydrogel. Serum samples were collected on study day 56 (post 3rd vaccination) and analyzed for TNA using the LeTx neutralization assay. Data are presented as the ED50 of LeTx for the corresponding serum sample with the solid line representing the geometric mean of the ED50 values per group of mice. Statistical significance was calculated using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests where * = p<0.05.
Fig 6Comparative immunogenicity of pp-PA83 and pp-dPA83 in mice.
Mice were immunized on study days 0 and 21 IM with 10 (with or without alum) or 1 μg (with alum) of pp-PA83 or pp-dPA83. Serum samples were collected on study day 42 (post 2nd vaccination) and analyzed for anti-PA IgG responses by ELISA (A) and TNA (B) using the LeTx neutralization assay. ELISA response are presented as the geometric mean serum IgG end point titers per group ± standard error of the mean and TNA data are presented as individual values with the geometric mean of the ED50 values per group of mice indicated by the black line in each data set. Statistical significance was calculated using the Mann-Whitney test where * = p<0.05 and ** = p<0.01.