Literature DB >> 27100680

Contamination during criminal investigation: Detecting police contamination and secondary DNA transfer from evidence bags.

Ane Elida Fonneløp1, Helen Johannessen2, Thore Egeland3, Peter Gill4.   

Abstract

As the profiling systems used in forensic analyses have become more sensitive in recent years, the risk of detecting a contamination in a DNA sample has increased proportionally. This requires more stringent work protocols and awareness to minimize the chance of contamination. Although there is high consciousness on contamination and best practice procedures in forensic labs, the same requirements are not always applied by the police. In this study we have investigated the risk of contamination from police staff. Environmental DNA was monitored by performing wipe tests (sampling of hot spots) at two large police units (scenes of crime departments). Additionally, the DNA profiles of the scenes of crime officers were compared to casework samples that their own unit had investigated in the period of 2009-2015. Furthermore, a pilot study to assess whether DNA from the outside package of an exhibit could be transferred to a DNA sample was carried out. Environmental DNA was detected in various samples from hot spots. Furthermore, 16 incidences of previously undetected police-staff contamination were found in casework that had been submitted between 2009 and 2015. In 6 cases the police officers with a matching DNA profile reported that they had not been involved with the case. We have demonstrated that DNA from the outside package can be transferred to an exhibit during examination. This experience demonstrates that when implementing the new multiplex systems, it is important to ensure that 'best practice' procedures are upgraded, and appropriate training is provided in order to ensure that police are aware of the increased contamination risks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Contamination; DNA; Forensic; Transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27100680     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  "Part Man, Part Machine, All Cop": Automation in Policing.

Authors:  Angelika Adensamer; Lukas Daniel Klausner
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 3.  Challenges in Human Skin Microbial Profiling for Forensic Science: A Review.

Authors:  Ana Neckovic; Roland A H van Oorschot; Bianca Szkuta; Annalisa Durdle
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Evaluation of Different Cleaning Strategies for Removal of Contaminating DNA Molecules.

Authors:  Martina Nilsson; Hanne De Maeyer; Marie Allen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.