Jose Zavala1, Bridget O'Brien1, Kim Lichtveld1, Kenneth G Sexton1, Ivan Rusyn1, Ilona Jaspers1,2,3, William Vizuete1. 1. a Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC, USA . 2. b Department of Pediatrics , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC, USA , and. 3. c Center for Environmental Medicine and Lung Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: EpiAirway™ 3-D constructs are human-derived cell cultures of differentiated airway epithelial cells that may represent a more biologically relevant model of the human lung. However, limited information is available on their utility for exposures to air pollutants at the air-liquid interface (ALI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the biological responses of EpiAirway™ cells in comparison to the responses of A549 human alveolar epithelial cells after exposure to air pollutants at ALI. METHODS: Cells were exposed to filtered air, 400 ppb of ozone (O3) or a photochemically aged Synthetic Urban Mixture (SynUrb54) consisting of hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, O3 and other secondary oxidation products for 4 h. Basolateral supernatants and apical washes were collected at 9 and 24 h post-exposure. We assessed cytotoxicity by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release into the culture medium and apical surface. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) proteins were measured in the culture medium and in the apical washes to determine the inflammatory response after exposure. RESULTS: Both O3 and SynUrb54 significantly increased basolateral levels of LDH and IL-8 in A549 cells. No significant changes in LDH and IL-8 levels were observed in the EpiAirway™ cells, however, IL-6 in the apical surface was significantly elevated at 24 h after O3 exposure. CONCLUSION: LDH and IL-8 are robust endpoints for assessing toxicity in A549 cells. The EpiAirway™ cells show minimal adverse effects after exposure suggesting that they are more toxicologically resistant compared to A549 cells. Higher concentrations or longer exposure times are needed to induce effects on EpiAirway™ cells.
CONTEXT: EpiAirway™ 3-D constructs are human-derived cell cultures of differentiated airway epithelial cells that may represent a more biologically relevant model of the human lung. However, limited information is available on their utility for exposures to air pollutants at the air-liquid interface (ALI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the biological responses of EpiAirway™ cells in comparison to the responses of A549human alveolar epithelial cells after exposure to air pollutants at ALI. METHODS: Cells were exposed to filtered air, 400 ppb of ozone (O3) or a photochemically aged Synthetic Urban Mixture (SynUrb54) consisting of hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, O3 and other secondary oxidation products for 4 h. Basolateral supernatants and apical washes were collected at 9 and 24 h post-exposure. We assessed cytotoxicity by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release into the culture medium and apical surface. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) proteins were measured in the culture medium and in the apical washes to determine the inflammatory response after exposure. RESULTS: Both O3 and SynUrb54 significantly increased basolateral levels of LDH and IL-8 in A549 cells. No significant changes in LDH and IL-8 levels were observed in the EpiAirway™ cells, however, IL-6 in the apical surface was significantly elevated at 24 h after O3 exposure. CONCLUSION: LDH and IL-8 are robust endpoints for assessing toxicity in A549 cells. The EpiAirway™ cells show minimal adverse effects after exposure suggesting that they are more toxicologically resistant compared to A549 cells. Higher concentrations or longer exposure times are needed to induce effects on EpiAirway™ cells.
Authors: Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Fabian Blank; Christian Mühlfeld; Peter Gehr Journal: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: K de Bruijne; S Ebersviller; K G Sexton; S Lake; D Leith; R Goodman; J Jetters; G W Walters; M Doyle-Eisele; R Woodside; H E Jeffries; I Jaspers Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Gautam Damera; Hengjiang Zhao; Miao Wang; Michael Smith; Christopher Kirby; William F Jester; John A Lawson; Reynold A Panettieri Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Konrad Ludwig Maier; Francesca Alessandrini; Ingrid Beck-Speier; Thomas Philipp Josef Hofer; Silvia Diabaté; Ellen Bitterle; Tobias Stöger; Thilo Jakob; Heidrun Behrendt; Marion Horsch; Johannes Beckers; Axel Ziesenis; Lothar Hültner; Marion Frankenberger; Susanne Krauss-Etschmann; Holger Schulz Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Anke Gabriele Lenz; Erwin Karg; Bernd Lentner; Vlad Dittrich; Christina Brandenberger; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Holger Schulz; George A Ferron; Otmar Schmid Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: Jose Zavala; Rebecca Greenan; Q Todd Krantz; David M DeMarini; Mark Higuchi; M Ian Gilmour; Paul A White Journal: Toxicol Res (Camb) Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 3.524
Authors: Lauren A Eaves; Hang T Nguyen; Julia E Rager; Kenneth G Sexton; Thomas Howard; Lisa Smeester; Anastasia N Freedman; Kjersti M Aagaard; Cynthia Shope; Barry Lefer; James H Flynn; Mathew H Erickson; Rebecca C Fry; William Vizuete Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Trevor B Tilly; Ryan X Ward; Jiva K Luthra; Sarah Robinson; Arantzazu Eiguren-Fernandez; Gregory S Lewis; Richard L Salisbury; John A Lednicky; Tara L Sabo-Attwood; Saber M Hussain; Chang-Yu Wu Journal: Aerosol Sci Technol Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Yvonne Chang; Lisbeth K Siddens; Lauren K Heine; David A Sampson; Zhen Yu; Kay A Fischer; Christiane V Löhr; Susan C Tilton Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Anna Poma; Sabrina Colafarina; Eleonora Aruffo; Osvaldo Zarivi; Antonella Bonfigli; Sebastiano Di Bucchianico; Piero Di Carlo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jose Zavala; Anastasia N Freedman; John T Szilagyi; Ilona Jaspers; John F Wambaugh; Mark Higuchi; Julia E Rager Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 3.390