Sharon Cummins1, Scott Leischow2, Linda Bailey3, Terry Bush4, Ken Wassum5, Lesley Copeland6, Shu-Hong Zhu7. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0905, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0905, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States. Electronic address: scummins@ucsd.edu. 2. Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, MCCRB 2-205, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, United States. Electronic address: leischow.scott@mayo.edu. 3. North American Quitline Consortium, 3219 E. Camelback Road, #416, Phoenix, AZ 85018, United States. Electronic address: lbailey@NAQuitline.org. 4. Alere Wellbeing, Clinical and Behavioral Sciences, 999 3rd Ave Suite 2100, Seattle, WA 98104, United States. Electronic address: Terry.Bush@alere.com. 5. Alere Wellbeing, Clinical and Behavioral Sciences, 999 3rd Ave Suite 2100, Seattle, WA 98104, United States. Electronic address: Ken.wassum@alere.com. 6. Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0905, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States. Electronic address: lcopeland@ucsd.edu. 7. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0905, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0905, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States. Electronic address: szhu@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Smokers are asking health practitioners for guidance about using e-cigarettes as an aid to quitting. Several studies have surveyed physicians. However, in North America many smokers seek help from telephone quitlines rather than physicians. The objective of the current study was to assess quitline counselors' perceptions of e-cigarettes and what they tell callers about these products. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey, conducted in 2014 with 418 quitline counselors in the U.S. and Canada, measured perceptions of e-cigarettes: (1) use as a quitting aid; (2) safety; (3) professional guidance given and organizational guidance received; (4) regulation. The response rate was 90.1%. Analyses included calculating standard errors and 95% confidence intervals around summary statistics. RESULTS: Nearly 70% of counselors believed that e-cigarettes are not effective quitting aids. Most believed e-cigarettes are addictive (87%) and that secondhand exposure to vapor is harmful (71%). Counselors reported that callers ask for advice about e-cigarettes, but few counselors recommended e-cigarettes (4%). Counselors (97%) reported being instructed by quitline employers to explain to clients that e-cigarettes are not FDA-approved; 74% were told to recommend approved quitting aids instead. Most counselors (>87%) believed e-cigarettes should be regulated like cigarettes in terms of advertising, taxation, access by minors, and use in public places. CONCLUSIONS: Quitline counselors view e-cigarettes as ineffective quitting aids, potentially dangerous, and in need of greater regulations. Counselors can influence how treatment seekers view e-cigarettes, therefore it is imperative that quitlines stay abreast of emerging data and communicate about these products in ways that best serve clients.
INTRODUCTION: Smokers are asking health practitioners for guidance about using e-cigarettes as an aid to quitting. Several studies have surveyed physicians. However, in North America many smokers seek help from telephone quitlines rather than physicians. The objective of the current study was to assess quitline counselors' perceptions of e-cigarettes and what they tell callers about these products. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey, conducted in 2014 with 418 quitline counselors in the U.S. and Canada, measured perceptions of e-cigarettes: (1) use as a quitting aid; (2) safety; (3) professional guidance given and organizational guidance received; (4) regulation. The response rate was 90.1%. Analyses included calculating standard errors and 95% confidence intervals around summary statistics. RESULTS: Nearly 70% of counselors believed that e-cigarettes are not effective quitting aids. Most believed e-cigarettes are addictive (87%) and that secondhand exposure to vapor is harmful (71%). Counselors reported that callers ask for advice about e-cigarettes, but few counselors recommended e-cigarettes (4%). Counselors (97%) reported being instructed by quitline employers to explain to clients that e-cigarettes are not FDA-approved; 74% were told to recommend approved quitting aids instead. Most counselors (>87%) believed e-cigarettes should be regulated like cigarettes in terms of advertising, taxation, access by minors, and use in public places. CONCLUSIONS: Quitline counselors view e-cigarettes as ineffective quitting aids, potentially dangerous, and in need of greater regulations. Counselors can influence how treatment seekers view e-cigarettes, therefore it is imperative that quitlines stay abreast of emerging data and communicate about these products in ways that best serve clients.
Authors: Katrina A Vickerman; Kelly M Carpenter; Tamara Altman; Chelsea M Nash; Susan M Zbikowski Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C King; Lia J Smith; Patrick J McNamara; Alicia K Matthews; Daniel J Fridberg Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sami H Alzahrani; Rawan A Alghamdi; Ahmed Mabruk Almutairi; Ali Ahmed Alghamdi; Abdullah Abdulwahab Aljuhani; Abdulrahman Hamed ALbalawi Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy Date: 2021-05-13
Authors: Amie L Severino; Arash Shadfar; Joshua K Hakimian; Oliver Crane; Ganeev Singh; Keith Heinzerling; Wendy M Walwyn Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Sue Cooper; Sophie Orton; Katarzyna A Campbell; Michael Ussher; Naomi Coleman-Haynes; Rachel Whitemore; Anne Dickinson; Andy McEwen; Sarah Lewis; Felix Naughton; Katharine Bowker; Lesley Sinclair; Linda Bauld; Tim Coleman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 3.390