Literature DB >> 27100168

Predictive Value of National Football League Scouting Combine on Future Performance of Running Backs and Wide Receivers.

Masaru Teramoto1, Chad L Cross, Stuart E Willick.   

Abstract

The National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine is held each year before the NFL Draft to measure athletic abilities and football skills of college football players. Although the NFL Scouting Combine can provide the NFL teams with an opportunity to evaluate college players for the upcoming NFL Draft, its value for predicting future success of players has been questioned. This study examined whether the NFL Combine measures can predict future performance of running backs (RBs) and wide receivers (WRs) in the NFL. We analyzed the 2000-09 Combine data of RBs (N = 276) and WRs (N = 447) and their on-field performance for the first 3 years after the draft and over their entire careers in the NFL, using correlation and regression analyses, along with a principal component analysis (PCA). The results of the analyses showed that, after accounting for the number of games played, draft position, height (HT), and weight (WT), the time on 10-yard dash was the most important predictor of rushing yards per attempt of the first 3 years (p = 0.002) and of the careers (p < 0.001) in RBs. For WRs, vertical jump was found to be significantly associated with receiving yards per reception of the first 3 years (p = 0.001) and of the careers (p = 0.004) in the NFL, after adjusting for the covariates above. Furthermore, HT was most important in predicting future performance of WRs. The analyses also revealed that the 8 athletic drills in the Combine seemed to have construct validity. It seems that the NFL Scouting Combine has some value for predicting future performance of RBs and WRs in the NFL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27100168     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Longitudinal Body Composition Changes in NCAA Division I College Football Players.

Authors:  Eric T Trexler; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; J Bryan Mann; Pat A Ivey; Katie R Hirsch; Meredith G Mock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Fat-Free Mass Index in NCAA Division I and II Collegiate American Football Players.

Authors:  Eric T Trexler; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Malia N M Blue; Richard M Schumacher; Jerry L Mayhew; J Bryan Mann; Pat A Ivey; Katie R Hirsch; Meredith G Mock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Physical Characteristics and Performance of Japanese Top-Level American Football Players.

Authors:  Daichi Yamashita; Masaki Asakura; Yoshihiko Ito; Shinzo Yamada; Yosuke Yamada
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Combine performance, draft position and playing position are poor predictors of player career outcomes in the Australian Football League.

Authors:  Benjamin J Gogos; Paul Larkin; Jade A Z Haycraft; Neil French Collier; Sam Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Citius, Altius, Fortius; Is It Enough to Achieve Success in Basketball?

Authors:  Javier García-Rubio; Daniel Carreras; Sebastian Feu; Antonio Antunez; Sergio J Ibáñez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights.

Authors:  Jose M Jimenez-Olmedo; Basilio Pueo; Jose M Mossi; Lamberto Villalon-Gasch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  The reliability of vertical jump tests between the Vertec and My Jump phone application.

Authors:  Vanessa R Yingling; Dimitri A Castro; Justin T Duong; Fiorella J Malpartida; Justin R Usher; Jenny O
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.