Literature DB >> 27100115

In vivo contribution of deoxynivalenol-3-β-D-glucoside to deoxynivalenol exposure in broiler chickens and pigs: oral bioavailability, hydrolysis and toxicokinetics.

Nathan Broekaert1, Mathias Devreese2, Thomas van Bergen2, Stijn Schauvliege2, Marthe De Boevre3, Sarah De Saeger3, Lynn Vanhaecke4, Franz Berthiller5, Herbert Michlmayr6, Alexandra Malachová5, Gerhard Adam6, An Vermeulen3, Siska Croubels7.   

Abstract

Crossover animal trials were performed with intravenous and oral administration of deoxynivalenol-3-β-D-glucoside (DON3G) and deoxynivalenol (DON) to broiler chickens and pigs. Systemic plasma concentrations of DON, DON3G and de-epoxy-DON were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry was used to unravel phase II metabolism of DON. Additionally for pigs, portal plasma was analysed to study presystemic hydrolysis and metabolism. Data were processed via tailor-made compartmental toxicokinetic models. The results in broiler chickens indicate that DON3G is not hydrolysed to DON in vivo. Furthermore, the absolute oral bioavailability of DON3G in broiler chickens was low (3.79 ± 2.68 %) and comparable to that of DON (5.56 ± 2.05 %). After PO DON3G administration to pigs, only DON was detected in plasma, indicating a complete presystemic hydrolysis of the absorbed fraction of DON3G. However, the absorbed fraction of DON3G, recovered as DON, was approximately 5 times lower than after PO DON administration, 16.1 ± 5.4 compared with 81.3 ± 17.4 %. Analysis of phase II metabolites revealed that biotransformation of DON and DON3G in pigs mainly consists of glucuronidation, whereas in chickens predominantly conjugation with sulphate occurred. The extent of phase II metabolism is notably higher for chickens than for pigs, which might explain the differences in sensitivity of these species to DON. Although in vitro studies demonstrate a decreased toxicity of DON3G compared with DON, the species-dependent toxicokinetic data and in vivo hydrolysis to DON illustrate the toxicological relevance and consequently the need for further research to establish a tolerable daily intake.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal trials; Fusarium toxins; Masked mycotoxins; Modified mycotoxins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27100115     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1710-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  31 in total

Review 1.  Toxicokinetics and metabolism of deoxynivalenol in animals and humans.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Jun Jiang; Peiqiang Mu; Ruqin Lin; Jikai Wen; Yiqun Deng
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.168

2.  A case of tail-biting on a multi-site swine operation in Ontario.

Authors:  Maggie Henry; Terri L O'Sullivan; Anna Kate Shoveller; Lee Niel; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 1.075

3.  Evaluation of dietary mycotoxin control strategies on nursery pig growth performance and blood measures.

Authors:  Larissa L Becker; Joel M DeRouchey; Jason C Woodworth; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Arnau Vidal; Christos Gougoulias; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Investigation of age-related differences in toxicokinetic processes of deoxynivalenol and deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside in weaned piglets.

Authors:  Amelie Catteuw; Mathias Devreese; Siegrid De Baere; Gunther Antonissen; Lada Ivanova; Silvio Uhlig; Ann Martens; Sarah De Saeger; Marthe De Boevre; Siska Croubels
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Porcine Small and Large Intestinal Microbiota Rapidly Hydrolyze the Masked Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol-3-Glucoside and Release Deoxynivalenol in Spiked Batch Cultures In Vitro.

Authors:  Silvia W Gratz; Valerie Currie; Anthony J Richardson; Gary Duncan; Grietje Holtrop; Freda Farquharson; Petra Louis; Philippe Pinton; Isabelle P Oswald
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  A multicomponent mycotoxin deactivator modifies the response of the jejunal mucosal and cecal bacterial community to deoxynivalenol contaminated feed and oral lipopolysaccharide challenge in chickens1.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Annegret Lucke; Barbara Doupovec; Qendrim Zebeli; Josef Böhm
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Comparative efficacy of commercially available deoxynivalenol detoxifying feed additives on growth performance, total tract digestibility of components, and physiological responses in nursery pigs fed diets formulated with naturally contaminated corn.

Authors:  Alice W Mwaniki; Quincy R Buis; David Trott; Lee-Anne Huber; Chengbo Yang; Elijah G Kiarie
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-10

8.  Effects of deoxynivalenol (DON) and its microbial biotransformation product deepoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM-1) on a trout, pig, mouse, and human cell line.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mayer; Barbara Novak; Alexandra Springler; Heidi E Schwartz-Zimmermann; Veronika Nagl; Nicole Reisinger; Sabine Hessenberger; Gerd Schatzmayr
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.833

9.  UDP-Glucosyltransferases from Rice, Brachypodium, and Barley: Substrate Specificities and Synthesis of Type A and B Trichothecene-3-O-β-d-glucosides.

Authors:  Herbert Michlmayr; Elisabeth Varga; Alexandra Malachová; Philipp Fruhmann; Marta Piątkowska; Christian Hametner; Jana Šofrová; Günther Jaunecker; Georg Häubl; Marc Lemmens; Franz Berthiller; Gerhard Adam
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 10.  Do Plant-Bound Masked Mycotoxins Contribute to Toxicity?

Authors:  Silvia W Gratz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.