Literature DB >> 27099768

The history of pulse therapy in lupus nephritis (1976-2016).

Morton Scheinberg1.   

Abstract

Pulse therapy with methylprednisolone became standard of care for the treatment of worsening lupus nephritis since its introduction in 1976. Even today, 40 years since its introduction, it is still a gold standard for this clinical condition. In this communication, we have reviewed the events that surrounded the use of this therapy by one of the authors of the original paper published in Lancet 40 years ago.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoimmunity; Lupus Nephritis; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Year:  2016        PMID: 27099768      PMCID: PMC4836283          DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2016-000149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lupus Sci Med        ISSN: 2053-8790


Glucocorticoids have been used for the management of inflammatory diseases for the last 60 years. The oral route is usually preferred for administration, with the minimum dose required to keep the disease state in remission. High-dose intravenous corticosteroids were initiated to successfully prevent renal allograft rejection.1 2 I remember that Edgar Cathcart and I were talking with two nephrologists at the cafeteria of the University Hospital (Boston University) back in 1974 on the results with pulse therapy in allograft rejection and the idea came to try to abrogate acute deterioration of renal function in lupus patients with pulse therapy. The initial results of the first seven patients were published in January 1976.3 The initial experience was confirmed by other groups and was extended to other clinical manifestations of active lupus and autoimmune diseases requiring acute immunosuppression with extensive citation throughout the last 40 years (table 1). Since the publication of the original paper in 1976, bolus injections of steroids have suffered considerable variation in the dose, number, timing and duration of the higher dose. Despite 40 years of use, the clarity of the mechanism of action is still, to some extent, unknown. It is well known that pulse therapy is cumulatively less toxic than treatment with continuous oral steroids at lower doses. However, it is also known that pulse therapy may be associated with side effects and contraindicated in systemic infections and uncontrolled hypertension and its use can lead to metabolic disturbances, and changes in behaviour, requiring adequate monitoring during its use (figures 1 and 2).
Table 1
Pubmed search 1976–2015
Lupus nephritis and pulse therapy366 papers
Lupus disease and pulse therapy1191 papers
Autoimmune disease and pulse therapy4708 papers
Figure 1

Publication of the first paper on systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis.

Figure 2

Boston University team rheumatology section 1976—MS on the left and Edgar Cathcart on the right.

Publication of the first paper on systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis. Boston University team rheumatology section 1976—MS on the left and Edgar Cathcart on the right. Ten years later, in 1986, the group at the National Institutes of Health reported the long-term results of their trial with monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide and later on, in further trials, confirmed the beneficial effects of high-dose steroids by combining pulses of cyclophosphamide with steroid pulses. It seems that, in the next decade, attempts to minimise steroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and replacing it with B-cell depletion are starting to grow, but even in that scenario, in the beginning, patients will still receive limited number of pulse steroids, and in a just released paper, 69 SLE experts indicated their preferences to treat serious lupus nephritis and high-dose steroids are still the first line of treatment, followed by mycophenolate.4–8
  8 in total

1.  High-dosage intravenously administered methylprednisolone in renal transplantation. A preliminary report.

Authors:  J E Woods; C F Anderson; J H DeWeerd; W J Johnson; J V Donadio; F J Leary; P P Frohnert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Initial treatment of renal allografts with large intrarenal doses of immunosuppressive drugs.

Authors:  S L Kountz; R Cohn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Beneficial effects of methylprednisolone "pulse" therapy in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.

Authors:  E S Cathcart; B A Idelson; M A Scheinberg; W G Couser
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Prospective observational single-centre cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of treating lupus nephritis with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil but no oral steroids.

Authors:  Marie B Condon; Damien Ashby; Ruth J Pepper; H Terence Cook; Jeremy B Levy; Megan Griffith; Tom D Cairns; Liz Lightstone
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide plus pulse methylprednisolone improves long-term renal outcome without adding toxicity in patients with lupus nephritis.

Authors:  G G Illei; H A Austin; M Crane; L Collins; M F Gourley; C H Yarboro; E M Vaughan; T Kuroiwa; C L Danning; A D Steinberg; J H Klippel; J E Balow; D T Boumpas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Treatment Algorithms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Chayawee Muangchan; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Sasha R Bernatsky; C Douglas Smith; Marie Hudson; Murat Inanç; Naomi F Rothfield; Peter T Nash; Richard A Furie; Jean-Luc Senécal; Vinod Chandran; Ruben Burgos-Vargas; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Janet E Pope
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  H A Austin; J H Klippel; J E Balow; N G le Riche; A D Steinberg; P H Plotz; J L Decker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Minimising steroids in lupus nephritis--will B cell depletion pave the way?

Authors:  L Lightstone
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.911

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The landscape of systemic lupus erythematosus in Brazil: An expert panel review and recommendations.

Authors:  Evandro Mendes Klumb; Morton Scheinberg; Viviane Angelina de Souza; Ricardo Machado Xavier; Valderilio Feijo Azevedo; Elizabeth McElwee; Mariana Rico Restrepo; Odirlei André Monticielo
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.911

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.