| Literature DB >> 27099531 |
Jamal Giri1, Basanta Kumar Shrestha2, Rajiv Yadav2, Tika Ram Ghimire2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of growth status of a patient is a key component in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for growing patients with skeletal discrepancy. Skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiograph and cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) are commonly used methods of growth assessment. Studies have shown that stages of dental calcification can also be used to assess skeletal maturation status of an individual, whereas other studies have suggested that the relationship between dental calcification and skeletal maturation should be interpreted with caution owing to racial variation.Entities:
Keywords: Demirjian index; cervical vertebral maturation; lateral cephalogram; orthopantomogram
Year: 2016 PMID: 27099531 PMCID: PMC4822803 DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S93561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent ISSN: 1179-1357
Distribution of chronological ages of all subjects grouped by CVM stages
| CVM stage | Sex | Number of subjects | Chronological age (years)
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | SD | |||
| Stage 1 | Male | 7 | 10.42 | 0.78 |
| Female | 7 | 8.85 | 0.89 | |
| Stage 2 | Male | 7 | 12.14 | 1.06 |
| Female | 7 | 10 | 1.73 | |
| Stage 3 | Male | 7 | 13.57 | 0.53 |
| Female | 7 | 12.71 | 0.95 | |
| Stage 4 | Male | 7 | 14.42 | 0.48 |
| Female | 7 | 14.42 | 1.51 | |
| Stage 5 | Male | 7 | 15.58 | 1.06 |
| Female | 7 | 15.42 | 0.81 | |
| Stage 6 | Male | 7 | 17.57 | 0.53 |
| Female | 7 | 16.42 | 1.51 | |
| Total | 84 (42 males and 42 females) | |||
Abbreviations: CVM, cervical vertebral maturation; SD, standard deviation.
Association between CVM and DI for female subjects (contingency table)
| CVM stages | DI stages
| Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | E | F | G | H | |||
| Stage 1 | Frequency | 4 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Percentage | 57.10 | 42.90 | 100 | ||||
| Stage 2 | Frequency | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | ||
| Percentage | 0.286 | 57.10 | 14.30 | 100 | |||
| Stage 3 | Frequency | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Percentage | 14.30 | 28.60 | 42.90 | 14.30 | 100 | ||
| Stage 4 | Frequency | 5 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Percentage | 71.40 | 28.60 | 100 | ||||
| Stage 5 | Frequency | 4 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Percentage | 57.10 | 42.90 | 100 | ||||
| Stage 6 | Frequency | 7 | 7 | ||||
| Percentage | 100 | 100 | |||||
Note: χ2(20)=59.738; Pearson’s contingency coefficient (C) =0.766, P<0.001 (significant).
Abbreviations: CVM, cervical vertebral maturation; DI, Demirjian index.
Association between CVM and DI for male subjects (contingency table)
| CVM stages | DI stages
| Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | E | F | G | H | |||
| Stage 1 | Frequency | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | ||
| Percentage | 14.30 | 28.60 | 57.10 | 100 | |||
| Stage 2 | Frequency | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | ||
| Percentage | 42.90 | 42.90 | 14.30 | 100 | |||
| Stage 3 | Frequency | 6 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Percentage | 85.70 | 14.30 | 100 | ||||
| Stage 4 | Frequency | 6 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Percentage | 85.70 | 14.30 | 100 | ||||
| Stage 5 | Frequency | 7 | 7 | ||||
| Percentage | 100 | 100 | |||||
| Stage 6 | Frequency | 7 | 7 | ||||
| Percentage | 100 | 100 | |||||
Note: χ2(20)=54.253; Pearson’s contingency coefficient (C) =0.751, P<0.001 (significant).
Abbreviations: CVM, cervical vertebral maturation; DI, Demirjian index.
Association between CVM stages and DI stages for male and female subjects
| CVM stages | DI stages
| |
|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | |
| Stages 1 and 2 | D and E | E and F |
| Stages 3 and 4 | F and G | G |
| Stages 5 and 6 | G and H | H |
Abbreviations: CVM, cervical vertebral maturation; DI, Demirjian index.