Literature DB >> 27099132

Real-Life and RCT Participants: Alendronate Users Versus FITs' Trial Eligibility Criterion.

Carlen Reyes1, Anton Pottegård2, Peter Schwarz3, M Kassim Javaid4,5, Tjeerd P Van Staa6,7, Cyrus Cooper4,5,8, Adolfo Diez-Perez9, Bo Abrahamsen10,11, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra1,4,5,12.   

Abstract

We aimed to characterize incident users of alendronate from Denmark and Spain, and investigate their eligibility for participation in the pivotal Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT). This is an international cross-sectional study, where the data were obtained from the SIDIAP database (Sistema d'Informació per al Desenvolupament de l'Investigació en Atenció Primària) from Catalonia (Spain) and the Danish Health Registries (DHR). This study included patients who were incident users of alendronate, ≥40 years old with no history of Paget's disease. Our measurements were the proportion of incident users of alendronate who were not eligible to participate in FIT. 14,316 and 21,221 subjects initiated alendronate in 2006-2007 (SIDIAP) and 2005-2006 (DHR), respectively. SIDIAP and DHR alendronate user cohorts had 2347 (16.4 %) and 5275 (24.9 %) subjects aged >80 years old, reported 9 (0.1 %) and 91 (0.4 %) diagnoses of myocardial infarction, 423 (3 %) and 368 (1.7 %) of erosive gastro-intestinal disease, 200 (1.4 %) and 1109 (5.2 %) of dyspepsia, and 349 (2.4 %) and 149 (0.7 %) of metabolic bone disease, all of which were exclusion criteria in FIT. Men [3818 (26.7 %) in SIDIAP and 3885 (18.3 %) in DHR] and glucocorticoid users [1229 (8.6 %) in SIDIAP and 4716 (22.2 %) in DHR] were also excluded from the FIT trial. Overall, 3447 (35.4 %) SIDIAP and 6228 (44.5 %) (when not considering men and glucocorticoid users) DHR of incident alendronate users would have been excluded from FIT. One in two real-life users of alendronate exhibited one or more clinical characteristics that would have led to them being excluded from the FIT trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alendronate; Observational study; Osteoporosis; Population characteristics; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27099132     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-016-0141-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  12 in total

Review 1.  Side effects of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Michael Kriegbaum Skjødt; Morten Frost; Bo Abrahamsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Association of Osteoporosis Medication Use After Hip Fracture With Prevention of Subsequent Nonvertebral Fractures: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Rishi J Desai; Mufaddal Mahesri; Younathan Abdia; Julie Barberio; Angela Tong; Dongmu Zhang; Panagiotis Mavros; Seoyoung C Kim; Jessica M Franklin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-07-06

3.  Bisphosphonates to reduce bone fractures in stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Danielle E Robinson; M Sanni Ali; Victoria Y Strauss; Leena Elhussein; Bo Abrahamsen; Nigel K Arden; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Fergus Caskey; Cyrus Cooper; Daniel Dedman; Antonella Delmestri; Andrew Judge; Muhammad Kassim Javaid; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Does treatment with bisphosphonates protect against fractures in real life? The HUNT study, Norway.

Authors:  M Hoff; E Skovlund; H E Meyer; A Langhammer; A J Søgaard; U Syversen; K Holvik; B Abrahamsen; B Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Confounding in observational studies based on large health care databases: problems and potential solutions - a primer for the clinician.

Authors:  Mette Nørgaard; Vera Ehrenstein; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Impact of Medication Adherence on Mortality and Cardiovascular Morbidity: Protocol for a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maria Giner-Soriano; Gerard Sotorra Figuerola; Jordi Cortés; Helena Pera Pujadas; Ana Garcia-Sangenis; Rosa Morros
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 7.  Overcoming Barriers to Parkinson Disease Trial Participation: Increasing Diversity and Novel Designs for Recruitment and Retention.

Authors:  Pavan A Vaswani; Thomas F Tropea; Nabila Dahodwala
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 6.088

8.  The impact of different strategies to handle missing data on both precision and bias in a drug safety study: a multidatabase multinational population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Merino; Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga; Samuel Hawley; Beatriz Poblador-Plou; Ana Llorente-García; Irene Petersen; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Comparative anti-fracture effectiveness of different oral anti-osteoporosis therapies based on "real-world" data: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched cohort findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Database and the Catalan SIDIAP Database.

Authors:  Sara Khalid; Sara Calderon-Larrañaga; Samuel Hawley; M Sanni Ali; Andrew Judge; Nigel Arden; Tjeerd van Staa; Cyrus Cooper; Muhammad Kassim Javaid; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 10.  The Challenges and Opportunities of Pharmacoepidemiology in Bone Diseases.

Authors:  Dunia Alarkawi; M Sanni Ali; Dana Bliuc; Jacqueline R Center; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.