Literature DB >> 27098699

Rapid Adaptation Induces Persistent Biases in Population Codes for Visual Motion.

Elizabeth Zavitz1, Hsin-Hao Yu2, Elise G Rowe3, Marcello G P Rosa2, Nicholas S C Price2.   

Abstract

Each visual experience changes the neural response to subsequent stimuli. If the brain is unable to incorporate these encoding changes, the decoding, or perception, of subsequent stimuli is biased. Although the phenomenon of adaptation pervades the nervous system, its effects have been studied mainly in isolation, based on neuronal encoding changes induced by an isolated, prolonged stimulus. To understand how adaptation-induced biases arise and persist under continuous, naturalistic stimulation, we simultaneously recorded the responses of up to 61 neurons in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) middle temporal area to a sequence of directions that changed every 500 ms. We found that direction-specific adaptation following only 0.5 s of stimulation strongly affected encoding for up to 2 s by reducing both the gain and the spike count correlations between pairs of neurons with preferred directions close to the adapting direction. In addition, smaller changes in bandwidth and preferred direction were observed in some animals. Decoding individual trials of adaptation-affected activity in simultaneously recorded neurons predicted repulsive biases that are consistent with the direction aftereffect. Surprisingly, removing spike count correlations by trial shuffling did not impact decoding performance or bias. When adaptation had the largest effect on encoding, the decoder made the most errors. This suggests that neural and perceptual repulsion is not a mechanism to enhance perceptual performance but is instead a necessary consequence of optimizing neural encoding for the identification of a wide range of stimulus properties in diverse temporal contexts. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although perception depends upon decoding the pattern of activity across a neuronal population, the encoding properties of individual neurons are unreliable: a single neuron's response to repetitions of the same stimulus is variable, and depends on both its spatial and temporal context. In this manuscript, we describe the complete cascade of adaptation-induced effects in sensory encoding and show how they predict population decoding errors consistent with perceptual biases. We measure the time course of adaptation-induced changes to the response properties of neurons in isolation, and to the correlation structure across pairs of simultaneously recorded neurons. These results provide novel insight into how and for how long adaptation affects the neural code, particularly during continuous, naturalistic vision.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/364579-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; area MT; direction aftereffect; marmoset; middle temporal area; motion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098699      PMCID: PMC6601831          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4563-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

Review 1.  Information processing with population codes.

Authors:  A Pouget; P Dayan; R Zemel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images.

Authors:  J R Müller; A B Metha; J Krauskopf; P Lennie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission.

Authors:  M J Wainwright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex.

Authors:  V Dragoi; J Sharma; M Sur
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code.

Authors:  A L Fairhall; G D Lewen; W Bialek; R R de Ruyter Van Steveninck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination.

Authors:  Valentin Dragoi; Jitendra Sharma; Earl K Miller; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Preparation for the in vivo recording of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of anaesthetised marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  James A Bourne; Marcello G P Rosa
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Protoc       Date:  2003-07

10.  Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. I. the role of input and intrinsic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Mark M Churchland; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  14 in total

1.  Dynamic population codes of multiplexed stimulus features in primate area MT.

Authors:  Erin Goddard; Samuel G Solomon; Thomas A Carlson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sensitivity of neurons in the middle temporal area of marmoset monkeys to random dot motion.

Authors:  Tristan A Chaplin; Benjamin J Allitt; Maureen A Hagan; Nicholas S C Price; Ramesh Rajan; Marcello G P Rosa; Leo L Lui
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neuronal Adaptation Reveals a Suboptimal Decoding of Orientation Tuned Populations in the Mouse Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Miaomiao Jin; Jeffrey M Beck; Lindsey L Glickfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Low rank mechanisms underlying flexible visual representations.

Authors:  Douglas A Ruff; Cheng Xue; Lily E Kramer; Faisal Baqai; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Rapid Sensory Adaptation Redux: A Circuit Perspective.

Authors:  Clarissa J Whitmire; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Magnitude, time course, and specificity of rapid adaptation across mouse visual areas.

Authors:  Miaomiao Jin; Lindsey L Glickfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motion Perception in the Common Marmoset.

Authors:  Shaun L Cloherty; Jacob L Yates; Dina Graf; Gregory C DeAngelis; Jude F Mitchell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Adaptation in the visual cortex: a case for probing neuronal populations with natural stimuli.

Authors:  Michoel Snow; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Odelia Schwartz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-27

9.  Axonal Projections From the Middle Temporal Area in the Common Marmoset.

Authors:  Hiroshi Abe; Toshiki Tani; Hiromi Mashiko; Naohito Kitamura; Taku Hayami; Satoshi Watanabe; Kazuhisa Sakai; Wataru Suzuki; Hiroaki Mizukami; Akiya Watakabe; Tetsuo Yamamori; Noritaka Ichinohe
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Giovanni Mancuso; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera; Gijs Plomp; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.