Literature DB >> 27098527

Leaf thickness controls variation in leaf mass per area (LMA) among grazing-adapted grasses in Serengeti.

Daniel M Griffith1, Kathleen M Quigley2, T Michael Anderson2.   

Abstract

Leaf mass per area (LMA) is a primary plant functional trait that represents the cost of constructing a leaf. Ultimately, plants modify LMA by altering leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), or both. While LMA can be modified through both of these constituents, studies of LMA have found that there is variation in whether LT or LDMC changes are responsible for LMA-and the relationships change depending on the species or functional groups being compared. In this study, we used a phylogenetic framework to determine that evolutionary shifts in LMA are driven by LT, and not LDMC, among 45 Serengeti grass species. We considered two alternative hypotheses that could result in evolutionary correlation of LMA on LT but not LDMC: either (1) LT is more labile than LDMC-and is therefore a less costly means to change LMA or (2) LDMC is tightly coupled to a different dimension of leaf variation (e.g., leaf hydraulics), leaving LT as the source of variation in LMA. LT was not more labile than LDMC, leading us to conclude that the evolution of LMA has been shaped by LT because LDMC is responding to other demands on leaf physiology. We speculate that leaf hydraulics provide this constraint on LDMC. The decoupling of LDMC from LT may allow plants to better optimize resource allocation in ecosystems where gradients in light competition, herbivory, and aridity place competing demands on leaf economics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leaf dry matter content (LDMC); Leaf economics; Leaf mass per area (LMA); Leaf thickness (LT); Trait evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098527     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3632-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology.

Authors:  Cyrille Violle; Brian J Enquist; Brian J McGill; Lin Jiang; Cécile H Albert; Catherine Hulshof; Vincent Jung; Julie Messier
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Two measurement methods of leaf dry matter content produce similar results in a broad range of species.

Authors:  María Victoria Vaieretti; Sandra Díaz; Denis Vile; Eric Garnier
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Using log-log scaling slope analysis for determining the contributions to variability in biological variables such as leaf mass per area: why it works, when it works and how it can be extended.

Authors:  Michael Renton; Hendrik Poorter
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests.

Authors:  Le Li; M Luke McCormack; Chengen Ma; Deliang Kong; Qian Zhang; Xiaoyong Chen; Hui Zeng; Ülo Niinemets; Dali Guo
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness.

Authors:  E T F Witkowski; Byron B Lamont
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Tradeoff between height and relative growth rate in a dominant grass from the Serengeti ecosystem.

Authors:  G Hartvigsen; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A global database of C4 photosynthesis in grasses.

Authors:  Colin P Osborne; Anna Salomaa; Thomas A Kluyver; Vernon Visser; Elizabeth A Kellogg; Osvaldo Morrone; Maria S Vorontsova; W Derek Clayton; David A Simpson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 9.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Ülo Niinemets; Lourens Poorter; Ian J Wright; Rafael Villar
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Leaf mass per area is independent of vein length per area: avoiding pitfalls when modelling phenotypic integration (reply to Blonder et al. 2014).

Authors:  Lawren Sack; Christine Scoffoni; Grace P John; Hendrik Poorter; Chase M Mason; Rodrigo Mendez-Alonzo; Lisa A Donovan
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  1 in total

1.  Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?

Authors:  Shuyan Lin; Lijuan Shao; Cang Hui; Yu Song; Gadi V P Reddy; Johan Gielis; Fang Li; Yulong Ding; Qiang Wei; Peijian Shi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.