Literature DB >> 27098500

Single-knot versus multiple-knot technique of perineal repair: a randomised controlled trial.

Dan O Selo-Ojeme1, Chukwunwendu Anthony Okonkwo2, Chukwuemeka Atuanya2, Kingsley Ndukwu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An important factor influencing the outcome of perineal repair is the repair technique. This study was done to determine if there is a difference in post perineal repair pain scores following the use of the standard multiple-knot technique (MKT) of perineal repair and a single-knot technique (SKT).
METHODS: We randomised 260 women who sustained a second-degree perineal tear at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria and had perineal repair using either a SKT or a MKT between 1 July 2014 and 28 February 2015. Primary outcome measure was pain assessed with a numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) on day two, day 10 and at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures were pain scores during basic activities of daily living, analgesia use, dyspareunia and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: Mean pain scores were significantly lower in the SKT group on day two (2.8 versus 5.6; P < 0.001) and day 10 (1.8 versus 3.3; P < 0.001). Significantly fewer women in the SKT group reported pain on day two (90/126, 71.4 % versus 122/128, 95.3 %; Relative Risk [RR] 0.6, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.6-0.8; P < 0.001), and day 10 (69/126, 54.8 % versus 107/128, 83.6 %; RR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.5-0.7; P < 0.001)]. Women in the SKT group were more likely to be satisfied with outcome of repair at three months (RR 1.4, 95 % CI 1.2-1.5; P < 0.001). No difference in pain scores and dyspareunia at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: SKT of perineal repair is associated with significantly less pain in the first 10 days postdelivery and a higher patient satisfaction rate at 3 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episiotomy; Numerical rating scale; Obstetric perineal trauma; Perineal repair technique; Perineal suture; Vaginal trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098500     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4101-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  3 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcomes and outcome measures in childbirth perineal trauma research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Jemina Loganathan; John Fahmy; Gabriele Falconi; Maria Rada; Abdullatif Elfituri; Jorge Milhem Haddad; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Cornelia Betschart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Women's experience of episiotomy: a qualitative study from China.

Authors:  Siyuan He; Hong Jiang; Xu Qian; Paul Garner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Ropivacaine 75 mg versus placebo in perineal infiltration for analgesic efficacy at mid- and long-term for episiotomy repair in postpartum women - the ROPISIO study: a two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Claire Cardaillac; Stéphane Ploteau; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Vincent Dochez; Norbert Winer; Guillaume Ducarme
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.