Literature DB >> 27097622

Clinicopathologic Review of 31 Cases of Solid Pseudopapillary Pancreatic Tumors: Can We Use the Scoring System of Microscopic Features for Suggesting Clinically Malignant Potential?

Jang-Hee Kim1, Jae-Myeong Lee.   

Abstract

A solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a pancreatic neoplasm of low malignant potential. The potentially malignant pathologic features of SPTs were regarded as angioinvasion, perineural invasion, deep invasion of the surrounding acinar tissue, and nuclear pleomorphism. We retrospectively reviewed 31 cases of SPTs (25 female and 6 male patients, with an average age of 35 ± 14 years). The mean follow-up period was 132.0 ± 55.9 months. To evaluate the clinical impact of above pathological parameters, we analyzed their correlation with actually observed clinical malignancy. In three cases, the SPTs were clearly clinically malignant: one patient had recurrences three times, one showed lymph node metastases, and one deep soft tissue invasion around the gastroduodenal artery. Tumor infiltration to the peripancreatic soft tissue was observed in 17 cases (54.8%). The pathologic features considered suggestive of malignant potential were angioinvasion (25.8%), perineural invasion (6.5%), presence of mitosis in 10 high-power fields (16.1%), and moderate nuclear pleomorphism (19.4%). The presence of at least three of these features was not correlated with clinically confirmed malignant behavior (P = 0.570). Microscopic pathologic features of SPTs cannot be reliably associated with aggressive clinical behavior. Moreover, the absence of these microscopic features cannot exclude clinical malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27097622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

Review 1.  Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm presenting as a primary ovarian mass in an eighteen-year-old female: report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  Miglena K Komforti; Morris Edelman; Cathy Fan; Sharon X Liang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Aggressiveness of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ii Uy Hao; Ho Kyung Hwang; Dong-Sub Yoon; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Surgical approach to solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the proximal pancreas: minimally invasive vs. open.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ii Uy Hao; Seoung Yoon Rho; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Jae Uk Chung; Woo Jung Lee; Dong Sup Yoon; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 4.  Solid-pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas is still an Enigma: a Clinicopathological Review.

Authors:  Attila Zalatnai; Viktória Kis-Orha
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A 63-Case Analysis of Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Features and Risk Factors of Malignancy.

Authors:  Hongchun Chen; Yuchen Huang; Ningning Yang; Wentian Yan; Ruxue Yang; Shan Zhang; Panpan Yang; Nan Li; Zhenzhong Feng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Clinical Pattern of Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Can Predict the Aggressive Behavior of Resected Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Ji-Su Kim; Emmanuel Ii-Uy Hao; Seoung-Yoon Rho; Ho-Kyoung Hwang; Woo-Jung Lee; Dong-Sub Yoon; Chang-Moo Kang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Repeated Resection for Recurrent Metastatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Kentaro Ichimura; Takahiro Uesaka; Hironobu Kikuchi; Koji Okuda; Masao Sunahara; Takahiro Oshima; Kazuhito Misawa
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-21

8.  Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: Is there a factor determining the prognosis? Experience of a single institution.

Authors:  Pinar Tasar; Sadik Ayhan Kilicturgay
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  SMARCB1/INI1-deficient pancreatic undifferentiated rhabdoid carcinoma mimicking solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yinan Hua; Piyush Soni; Douglas Larsen; Riyam Zreik; Bing Leng; Debby Rampisela
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.