Literature DB >> 27097155

Duration of urethral catheterization after urethroplasty: how long is enough?

Filip Poelaert1, Willem Oosterlinck2, Anne-Françoise Spinoit2, Nicolaas Lumen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To report the impact of duration of urethral catheterization (DUC) on the rate of extravasation on voiding cysto-urethrography (VCUG) and the subsequent need of catheter replacement in urethroplasty.
METHODS: Two hundred nineteen consecutive patients undergoing urethroplasty between October 2010 and November 2014 were evaluated for the impact of DUC. Patients were divided into 2 groups, based on the scheduled DUC≤10 days (group 1, N.=86) or >10 days (group 2, N.=133).
RESULTS: Fourteen patients (6.4%) had extravasation on VCUG with an additional period of catheter usage. In 10 of the 14 patients (71.4%) clinical signs of impaired wound healing were present. In group 1 (median DUC 8 days) 3 patients (3.5%) needed an additional period of urethral catheterization, compared to 11 patients (8.3%) in group 2 (median DUC 14 days). Strictures in group 2 were longer (4 vs. 2 cm, P<0.001) and more complex. Redo urethroplasty was needed in 9 of the 14 patients with extravasation.
CONCLUSIONS: In uncomplicated cases of urethroplasty, the urethral catheter can be safely removed after 8 to 10 days postoperatively. Extravasation on VCUG occurs in around 6% of urethroplasties and is a prognostic factor for stricture recurrence and reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27097155     DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02639-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol        ISSN: 0393-2249            Impact factor:   3.720


  5 in total

1.  Novel pericatheter retrograde urethrogram technique is a viable method for postoperative urethroplasty imaging.

Authors:  Rachael D Sussman; F Cameron Hill; George E Koch; Versha Patel; Krishnan Venkatesan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture in men: the OPEN RCT.

Authors:  Robert Pickard; Beatriz Goulao; Sonya Carnell; Jing Shen; Graeme MacLennan; John Norrie; Matt Breckons; Luke Vale; Paul Whybrow; Tim Rapley; Rebecca Forbes; Stephanie Currer; Mark Forrest; Jennifer Wilkinson; Elaine McColl; Daniela Andrich; Stewart Barclay; Jonathan Cook; Anthony Mundy; James N'Dow; Stephen Payne; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Excision and Primary Anastomosis for Short Bulbar Strictures: Is It Safe to Change from the Transecting towards the Nontransecting Technique?

Authors:  M Waterloos; W Verla; W Oosterlinck; P François; N Lumen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Endoscopic urethrotomy versus open urethroplasty for men with bulbar urethral stricture: the OPEN randomised trial cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Luke Vale; Beatriz Goulao; Paul Whybrow; Stephen Payne; Nick Watkin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Comparison of two different methods of establishment of canine urethroplasty model: an experimental trial.

Authors:  Jianpo Zhai; Danhui Zhao; Guanglin Huang; Libo Man; Guoqiang Yan; Chengai Wu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.