Understanding the role of autophagy in cancer has been limited by the inability to measure this dynamic process in formalin-fixed tissue. We considered that 3-dimensional models including ex vivo tumor, such as we have developed for studying mesothelioma, would provide valuable insights. Using these models, in which we could use lysosomal inhibitors to measure the autophagic flux, we sought a marker of autophagy that would be valid in formalin-fixed tumor and be used to assess the role of autophagy in patient outcome. Autophagy was studied in mesothelioma cell lines, as 2-dimensional (2D) monolayers and 3-dimensional (3D) multicellular spheroids (MCS), and in tumor from 25 chemonaive patients, both as ex vivo 3D tumor fragment spheroids (TFS) and as formalin-fixed tissue. Autophagy was evaluated as autophagic flux by detection of the accumulation of LC3 after lysosomal inhibition and as autophagy initiation by detection of ATG13 puncta. We found that autophagic flux in 3D, but not in 2D, correlated with ATG13 positivity. In each TFS, ATG13 positivity was similar to that of the original tumor. When tested in tissue microarrays of 109 chemonaive patients, higher ATG13 positivity correlated with better prognosis and provided information independent of known prognostic factors. Our results show that ATG13 is a static marker of the autophagic flux in 3D models of mesothelioma and may also reflect autophagy levels in formalin-fixed tumor. If confirmed, this marker would represent a novel prognostic factor for mesothelioma, supporting the notion that autophagy plays an important role in this cancer.
Understanding the role of autophagy in cancer has been limited by the inability to measure this dynamic process in formalin-fixed tissue. We considered that 3-dimensional models including ex vivo tumor, such as we have developed for studying mesothelioma, would provide valuable insights. Using these models, in which we could use lysosomal inhibitors to measure the autophagic flux, we sought a marker of autophagy that would be valid in formalin-fixed tumor and be used to assess the role of autophagy in patient outcome. Autophagy was studied in mesothelioma cell lines, as 2-dimensional (2D) monolayers and 3-dimensional (3D) multicellular spheroids (MCS), and in tumor from 25 chemonaive patients, both as ex vivo 3D tumor fragment spheroids (TFS) and as formalin-fixed tissue. Autophagy was evaluated as autophagic flux by detection of the accumulation of LC3 after lysosomal inhibition and as autophagy initiation by detection of ATG13 puncta. We found that autophagic flux in 3D, but not in 2D, correlated with ATG13 positivity. In each TFS, ATG13 positivity was similar to that of the original tumor. When tested in tissue microarrays of 109 chemonaive patients, higher ATG13 positivity correlated with better prognosis and provided information independent of known prognostic factors. Our results show that ATG13 is a static marker of the autophagic flux in 3D models of mesothelioma and may also reflect autophagy levels in formalin-fixed tumor. If confirmed, this marker would represent a novel prognostic factor for mesothelioma, supporting the notion that autophagy plays an important role in this cancer.
Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy), a degradation process that eliminates dysfunctional proteins and organelles and thereby provides energy and amino acids, may play an important role in cancer, although its actual role is still unclear. Autophagy can play a dual role and both inhibition and stimulation of autophagy have been discussed as potential approaches in cancer therapy. Some of the confusion about the role of autophagy in cancer may arise from the difficulties in measuring the dynamic process of autophagy in formalin-fixed tumor specimens. The analysis of autophagy in tumor samples will be necessary to understand the level of autophagy at basal conditions and after modulation and perhaps to determine which strategy, either autophagy inhibition or stimulation, would be a more effective therapeutic approach. Currently, autophagy is most accurately measured by determining the autophagic degradation activity, referred to as autophagic flux, which requires inhibition of lysosomal proteases, something that clearly cannot be performed in fixed clinical samples. The study of autophagy in cancer would be advanced by finding static markers in fixed tumor that correlate with the dynamic process of autophagy.Thus, there is a need for models that provide useful information about autophagy in tumor. In this regard, 3D cultures of cancer cell lines are increasingly used as clinically relevant models for the study of autophagy. Nevertheless, the findings in in vitro 3D models are limited without a correlation to the autophagic flux in actual tumor. We considered that an ex vivo 3D tumor model in which lysosomal inhibitors could be used ex vivo would enable measurement of autophagic flux in actual tumor. Knowing the autophagic flux in ex vivo tumor, we could then seek accurate markers that could be applied to fixed tumor samples.In our work in malignant pleural mesothelioma, a highly chemoresistant solid tumor, we have established an ex vivo 3D model of living tumor, the tumor fragment spheroid (TFS) model, which has been useful for studying tumor biology. Here, we measured the levels of autophagy in 2D monolayers and in our 3D models, including ex vivo TFS. We then asked whether the levels of autophagic flux, as measured in 3D models, correlated with a static marker of autophagy that could be measured in fixed tumor samples and, if so, whether such a marker would correlate with clinical outcome.
Results
In 3D multicellular spheroids, autophagic flux differs from that measured in 2D
To determine whether autophagy differs in 2D and 3D, we measured the autophagic flux in cell lines grown in both settings. The autophagic flux was determined by inhibiting the degradation function of lysosomes and then measuring the accumulation of lipidated microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 isoform B (LC3B-II), by immunoblotting, or of autophagic vesicles loaded with LC3B-II, by immunofluorescence. Six malignant pleural mesothelioma cell lines grown as monolayers (2D) or as multicellular spheroids (MCS, 3D) were exposed or not exposed to the lysosomal inhibitor ammonium chloride (NH4+) for 8 h.By LC3 immunoblotting (Fig. 1), we found that, for each cell line, the autophagic flux differs between 2D and 3D cultures. The autophagic flux was lower in 3D than in 2D in 3 cell lines (Fig. 1, MCS-low autophagy), and higher in 3D than in 2D in the other 3 (Fig. 1, MCS-high autophagy). The autophagic flux in 3D did not correlate with that in 2D.
Figure 1.
In mesothelioma cells, LC3 immunoblotting shows that autophagic flux differs between 2D and 3D cultures. (A) Cells were grown as monolayers (2D) or MCS (3D). Where indicated, the cells were exposed to 10 mM ammonium chloride (NH4+) for 8 h. LC3B expression was assessed by immunoblotting. As a loading control, filters were probed with anti TUBA/α-tubulin antibody. Band intensities were determined by densitometric analysis. The autophagic flux is expressed as a ratio of normalized LC3B-II band intensities after NH4+ to before NH4+ (NH4+:CTRL). A representative immunoblot of 3 independent experiments is shown, with ratios shown below. (B) Bars show the autophagic flux of 2D (light gray) or 3D (dark gray) cultures of the indicated cell lines. Data were obtained from 3 independent experiments, one of which is shown in (A). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences of autophagic flux between 2D and 3D (P< 0.05). Error bars, SD. The mean LC3-II ratios in 3D are significantly higher in MCS-high autophagy than in MCS-low autophagy cell lines (P < 0.05).
In mesothelioma cells, LC3 immunoblotting shows that autophagic flux differs between 2D and 3D cultures. (A) Cells were grown as monolayers (2D) or MCS (3D). Where indicated, the cells were exposed to 10 mM ammonium chloride (NH4+) for 8 h. LC3B expression was assessed by immunoblotting. As a loading control, filters were probed with anti TUBA/α-tubulin antibody. Band intensities were determined by densitometric analysis. The autophagic flux is expressed as a ratio of normalized LC3B-II band intensities after NH4+ to before NH4+ (NH4+:CTRL). A representative immunoblot of 3 independent experiments is shown, with ratios shown below. (B) Bars show the autophagic flux of 2D (light gray) or 3D (dark gray) cultures of the indicated cell lines. Data were obtained from 3 independent experiments, one of which is shown in (A). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences of autophagic flux between 2D and 3D (P< 0.05). Error bars, SD. The mean LC3-II ratios in 3D are significantly higher in MCS-high autophagy than in MCS-low autophagy cell lines (P < 0.05).By LC3 immunofluorescence, we verified the levels of autophagic flux in each cell line (Fig. 2A). Autophagic vesicles loaded with LC3B-II were counted as LC3 puncta and the ratio between LC3 puncta detected in NH4+-exposed and control unexposed cells is shown in Figure 2B. These findings confirm that autophagy in 3D differs from that in 2D.
Figure 2.
In mesothelioma cells, LC3 immunofluorescence confirms that autophagic flux differs between 2D and 3D cultures. (A) Cells were grown as in Fig. 1, trypsinized and cytospun on glass slides. Cells were then fixed and stained for LC3B (green) and nuclei (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. Arrowheads indicate LC3 puncta. Representative cells of 2 independent experiments are shown. Scale bars: 10 µm. (B) Bars show the ratio between LC3 puncta counted in cells grown in the presence or absence of 10 mM ammonium chloride (NH4+). Asterisks indicate significantly different LC3 puncta ratios between 2D and 3D (P< 0.05). Error bars, SD. The mean LC3 puncta ratios in 3D are also significantly higher in MCS-high autophagy than in MCS-low autophagy cell lines (P < 0.05).
In mesothelioma cells, LC3 immunofluorescence confirms that autophagic flux differs between 2D and 3D cultures. (A) Cells were grown as in Fig. 1, trypsinized and cytospun on glass slides. Cells were then fixed and stained for LC3B (green) and nuclei (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. Arrowheads indicate LC3 puncta. Representative cells of 2 independent experiments are shown. Scale bars: 10 µm. (B) Bars show the ratio between LC3 puncta counted in cells grown in the presence or absence of 10 mM ammonium chloride (NH4+). Asterisks indicate significantly different LC3 puncta ratios between 2D and 3D (P< 0.05). Error bars, SD. The mean LC3 puncta ratios in 3D are also significantly higher in MCS-high autophagy than in MCS-low autophagy cell lines (P < 0.05).We considered that some lysosomal inhibitors, including NH4+, may activate autophagy, especially at longer exposures. Thus, we repeated the experiment with a second inhibitor and for a shorter duration of exposure. The 6 cell lines grown as 2D or 3D were exposed or not exposed to NH4+ or to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as an additional lysosomal inhibitor, for 4 h (Fig. S1). In this experiment, we confirmed the previous results, showing that there are 2 groups of mesothelioma cell lines that exhibit low or high autophagic flux in 3D and that the autophagic flux in 3D does not correlate with that in 2D. The 2 inhibitors, NH4+ and HCQ, led to the same conclusion for each cell line.
In 3D multicellular spheroids, but not in 2D, autophagic flux appears to correlate with the autophagy initiation status (ATG13 puncta)
We next focused on uncovering a marker of autophagy whose static measurement would reflect the autophagic flux in mesothelioma cell lines, allowing assessment of autophagy without the need for lysosomal inhibition. We considered that autophagy proteins involved in the early phases of autophagy would possibly reflect the autophagic flux. In particular, we focused on proteins of the 2 complexes that signal the onset of autophagy: the BECN1/Beclin 1-class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ULK1 complexes.The first regulatory complex includes BECN1, which is an autophagy-related protein. Moreover, BECN1 expression level correlates with patient outcome in other tumors. However, we found that BECN1 expression in the 6 mesothelioma cell lines grown as 2D or 3D does not reflect their level of autophagic flux (Fig. S2A).The second regulatory complex, the ULK1 complex, includes ATG13, which is of pivotal importance to autophagy initiation. The activity of the ULK1 complex can be assessed by the formation of puncta by its subunits, including ATG13, representing relocation of the complex to the autophagosome, as the earliest event in autophagy initiation. Indeed, we recently have found that ATG13 puncta are present in MCS with high autophagy. Therefore, we asked whether ATG13 puncta reflect the autophagic flux of the cell lines in either the 2D or 3D setting.In 2D monolayer cultures of all cell lines, ATG13 puncta were almost undetectable (Fig. 3; 2D) whether or not the cell lines had a high autophagic flux in 2D (see Fig. 1). We concluded that the autophagy initiation status did not reflect the autophagic flux in 2D.
Figure 3.
In mesothelioma cells, ATG13 puncta reflect the autophagic flux only in 3D. Mesothelioma cells were grown as monolayers (2D) on coverslips or as MCS (3D). Spheroid cells were trypsinized and cytospun on glass slides. Cells adherent on cover slips or glass slides were then fixed, stained for ATG13 (green) and nuclei (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. Representative ATG13 puncta are indicated by arrowheads. Scale bars: 10 µm.
In mesothelioma cells, ATG13 puncta reflect the autophagic flux only in 3D. Mesothelioma cells were grown as monolayers (2D) on coverslips or as MCS (3D). Spheroid cells were trypsinized and cytospun on glass slides. Cells adherent on cover slips or glass slides were then fixed, stained for ATG13 (green) and nuclei (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. Representative ATG13 puncta are indicated by arrowheads. Scale bars: 10 µm.However, in 3D, ATG13 puncta did reflect the autophagic flux. In MCS with low autophagy, ATG13 puncta staining was weak and was seen only in a few cells (Fig. 3; 3D, MCS-low autophagy) whereas, in MCS with high autophagy, ATG13 puncta staining was strong and seen in many cells (Fig. 3; 3D, MCS-high autophagy).Interestingly, the level of ATG13 protein did not reflect the differences seen in ATG13 puncta (Fig. S2A and S2B). Although a difference was found between the low and high autophagy cell lines, the level of ATG13 protein did not differ between 2D and 3D and thus did not reflect the presence of ATG13 puncta nor the autophagic flux. We concluded that ATG13 protein levels remain fairly constant independent of the aggregation of the proteins in puncta and the level of autophagic flux.Our data suggest that in 3D, but not in 2D, cultures the presence of ATG13 puncta (but not ATG13 protein levels) could identify mesothelioma cells with either low or high autophagic flux at basal conditions, without the need for lysosomal inhibitors.Because ATG13 puncta did not reflect the high autophagic flux in 2D cultures of the MCS-low autophagy group (Fig. 3; top left, 2D, MCS-low autophagy), we considered that ATG13 puncta formation might be defective in that 2D setting. We therefore repeated the analysis of ATG13 puncta in the 6 mesothelioma cell lines after stimulating autophagy with Earle's balanced salt solution (EBSS). Under these nutrient deprivation conditions, ATG13 puncta were detectable in all the cell lines grown in both 2D and 3D (Fig. S3). In addition, LC3 puncta analysis, performed in 2 cell lines representative of the MCS-low or MCS-high autophagy groups, confirmed that EBSS induced a high autophagic flux both in 2D and 3D (Fig. S4), matching the observation with ATG13 puncta. Thus, the absence of ATG13 puncta in 2D at basal conditions did not represent an inability to form ATG13 puncta but may indicate that, in 2D basal conditions, autophagy initiation does not involve ATG13.We conclude that, in 3D, the presence of ATG13 puncta is useful to identify mesothelioma cells with either low or high autophagic flux, during both basal and stimulated autophagy. In 2D, on the other hand, ATG13 puncta reflect the presence of cells with high autophagic flux only after a strong stimulation of autophagy.
In ex vivo tumor fragment spheroids, autophagic flux was assessed by the percentage of cells containing LC3 puncta and reveals tumors with either low or high autophagy
Building on our measurements of autophagic flux in cell lines, we now aimed to measure autophagic flux in ex vivo tumor itself, using tumor fragment spheroids (TFS) generated from tumor resected from 25 chemonaive MPM patients. In TFS, where it was not possible to determine mesothelioma-cell specific LC3 accumulation by immunoblotting, we relied on immunofluorescence, in which mesothelioma cells were identified by KRT/cytokeratin staining. Because the LC3 puncta overlapped each other in the tissue sections and could not be individually counted, we counted the percentage of KRT/cytokeratin-positive cells containing LC3 puncta (LC3B-II-positive MPM cells x100/total MPM cells). TFS were grown in the presence or absence of NH4+ and the percentage of LC3-positive MPM cells was measured.In TFS not exposed to NH4+, few cells with LC3 puncta were detected (Fig. 4A and B; CTRL). In TFS exposed to NH4+, the percentage of LC3-positive MPM cells in the TFS increased to different degrees identifying 2 groups: approximately half the TFS had a small increase, defining a TFS-low autophagy group, and the other half had a large increase, defining a TFS-high autophagy group (Fig. 4A and B; NH4+). On average, the percentage of LC3-positive cells increased by less than 2-fold (from 1.7% to 2.9% of MPM cells) in the TFS-low autophagy and by 8-fold (from 2.5% to 20.8% of MPM cells) in the TFS-high autophagy (Table 1).
Figure 4.
In tumor fragment spheroids, LC3 immunofluorescence indicates low or high levels of autophagy. TFS were generated from tumor biopsies obtained from 25 chemonaive MPM patients and grown in the presence or absence of ammonium chloride (NH4+) for 12 h. TFS were then fixed, embedded in paraffin, stained for LC3B (green), KRT/cytokeratin to identify mesothelioma cells (red), and nuclei (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) Bars represent the mean percentage of LC3-positive MPM cells measured in TFS grown in the presence (gray bars) or absence (white bars) of NH4+. Error bars, SEM (B) Representative images of TFS with either low (TFS #8) or high (TFS #2) autophagy levels are shown, with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with LC3 puncta (LC3-positive MPM cells) indicated in parentheses. Zoom-in view of the region in the dashed box shows representative cells with LC3 puncta (arrowhead). Scale bars: 10 µm.
Table 1.
In tumor fragment spheroids, LC3-positivity is shown at baseline and after ammonium chloride (NH4+) treatment. The percentages of LC3-positive MPM cells are shown for low (A) or high (B) autophagy TFS grown in the presence (NH4+) or absence (CTRL) of ammonium chloride. For each TFS, data are expressed as mean percentages. Parentheses, SEM. The difference in the percentage of LC3B-positive MPM cells following exposure to ammonium chloride (NH4+-CTRL) is also shown for each TFS.
(A) TFS-low autophagy
(B) TFS-high autophagy
TFS #
LC3 CTRL % of LC3-positive MPM cells (SEM)
LC3 NH4+ % of LC3-positive MPM cells (SEM)
LC3 difference (NH4+ - CTRL)
TFS #
LC3 CTRL % of LC3-positive MPM cells (SEM)
LC3 NH4+ % of LC3-positive MPM cells (SEM)
LC3 difference (NH4+ - CTRL)
1
1.4 (0.8)
1.6 (0.5)
0.2
2
2.3 (0.2)
26.3 (2.1)
24.0
3
1.1 (1.1)
1.6 (0.9)
0.5
4
2.9 (0.7)
37.4 (3.0)
34.5
7
0.4 (0.4)
1.0 (1.0)
0.6
5
1.9 (0.2)
16.6 (3.2)
14.7
8
1.4 (0.1)
2.3 (0.4)
0.9
6
1.7 (0.3)
18.1 (2.5)
16.5
9
0.4 (0.4)
0.9 (0.5)
0.5
11
2.3 (0.6)
16.8 (0.9)
14.5
10
0.5 (0.5)
1.0 (1.0)
0.5
12
2.2 (0.6)
11.6 (3.0)
9.4
13
1.0 (1.0)
0.7 (0.7)
−0.2
14
2.0 (0.9)
21.6 (1.2)
19.6
15
3.0 (0.7)
6.0 (0.1)
3.0
16
1.9 (0.0)
17.5 (1.2)
15.6
17
1.9 (1.0)
3.9 (0.7)
2.0
18
4.8 (2.4)
29.6 (1.9)
24.9
20
3.3 (0.5)
6.6 (1.3)
3.3
19
2.2 (0.7)
15.1 (2.3)
12.8
21
3.1 (1.7)
4.9 (1.2)
1.8
23
2.8 (0.4)
18.0 (4.1)
15.2
22
3.0 (0.3)
5.4 (0.7)
2.4
25
3.3 (1.1)
21.2 (2.7)
17.9
24
1.4 (0.3)
1.5 (0.3)
0.1
mean (SEM)
2.5 (0.2)
20.8 (2.1)
18.3 (1.9)
mean (SEM)
1.7 (0.3)
2.9 (0.6)
1.2 (0.3)
In tumor fragment spheroids, LC3 immunofluorescence indicates low or high levels of autophagy. TFS were generated from tumor biopsies obtained from 25 chemonaive MPM patients and grown in the presence or absence of ammonium chloride (NH4+) for 12 h. TFS were then fixed, embedded in paraffin, stained for LC3B (green), KRT/cytokeratin to identify mesothelioma cells (red), and nuclei (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) Bars represent the mean percentage of LC3-positive MPM cells measured in TFS grown in the presence (gray bars) or absence (white bars) of NH4+. Error bars, SEM (B) Representative images of TFS with either low (TFS #8) or high (TFS #2) autophagy levels are shown, with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with LC3 puncta (LC3-positive MPM cells) indicated in parentheses. Zoom-in view of the region in the dashed box shows representative cells with LC3 puncta (arrowhead). Scale bars: 10 µm.In tumor fragment spheroids, LC3-positivity is shown at baseline and after ammonium chloride (NH4+) treatment. The percentages of LC3-positive MPM cells are shown for low (A) or high (B) autophagy TFS grown in the presence (NH4+) or absence (CTRL) of ammonium chloride. For each TFS, data are expressed as mean percentages. Parentheses, SEM. The difference in the percentage of LC3B-positive MPM cells following exposure to ammonium chloride (NH4+-CTRL) is also shown for each TFS.We note that, in each TFS, even in the high autophagy group, there were mesothelioma cells that did not show LC3 puncta after exposure to NH4+. We concluded that 2 populations of mesothelioma cells, with either undetectable or detectable autophagic flux, existed in different percentages in each TFS.Our data show that ex vivo mesothelioma can have either a low or high level of autophagy, as determined by the percentage of tumor cells that demonstrate autophagy within the TFS. These measurements represent the first time that autophagy has been measured in living mesothelioma tumor grown ex vivo.
In ex vivo tumor fragment spheroids, autophagic flux correlates with the autophagy initiation status (ATG13 puncta)
To determine whether ATG13 would be a useful marker of autophagic flux in ex vivo tumor, as in 3D MCS, we measured the percentage of MPM cells containing ATG13 puncta in TFS not exposed to NH4+. In the TFS previously identified as having low autophagy (Fig. 4), we observed a low percentage of mesothelioma cells with ATG13 puncta (ATG13-positive MPM cells) (Fig. 5A and B; TFS-low autophagy) and, in the TFS previously identified as having high autophagy, we found a high percentage of ATG13-positive cells (Fig. 5A and B; TFS-high autophagy).
Figure 5.
In tumor fragment spheroids, ATG13 puncta analysis reflects the low or high levels of autophagy. The TFS shown in Figure 4 and not exposed to ammonium chloride (NH4+) were fixed, embedded in paraffin, stained for ATG13 (green), KRT/cytokeratin to identify mesothelioma cells (red) and nuclei (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) Bars represent the mean percentage of ATG13-positive MPM cells for the TFS determined in Figure 4 to be low or high ATG. Error bars, SEM (B) Representative images of TFS with either low autophagy (TFS #8) or high autophagy (TFS #2) levels are shown, with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with ATG13 puncta (ATG13-positive MPM cells) indicated in parentheses. Zoom-in view of the region in the dashed box shows representative cells with ATG13 puncta (arrowhead). Scale bars: 10 µm.
In tumor fragment spheroids, ATG13 puncta analysis reflects the low or high levels of autophagy. The TFS shown in Figure 4 and not exposed to ammonium chloride (NH4+) were fixed, embedded in paraffin, stained for ATG13 (green), KRT/cytokeratin to identify mesothelioma cells (red) and nuclei (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) Bars represent the mean percentage of ATG13-positive MPM cells for the TFS determined in Figure 4 to be low or high ATG. Error bars, SEM (B) Representative images of TFS with either low autophagy (TFS #8) or high autophagy (TFS #2) levels are shown, with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with ATG13 puncta (ATG13-positive MPM cells) indicated in parentheses. Zoom-in view of the region in the dashed box shows representative cells with ATG13 puncta (arrowhead). Scale bars: 10 µm.Notably, the percentages of ATG13-positive MPM cells (at baseline) correlated with those of LC3-positive MPM cells (after lysosomal inhibition) (Fig. 6A). We considered whether the same cells were positive for both ATG13 and LC3. Double staining for ATG13 and LC3A/B was then performed in a TFS with high autophagy, grown in the presence or absence of NH4+. As shown in Figure 6B, we observed that, without NH4+, ATG13 staining was seen but no LC3. After NH4+, the LC3 staining increased and, except for a few cells that stained for only one marker, LC3 staining was seen in the cells that also showed ATG13 puncta. The colocalization indicated that, at a cellular level, autophagy initiation corresponded with autophagic flux.
Figure 6.
In tumor fragment spheroids, autophagy initiation correlates with the autophagic flux. (A) TFS exposed to NH4+ were stained for LC3 and the same TFS not exposed to NH4+ were stained for ATG13; both were stained for KRT/cytokeratin to identify the mesothelioma cells. The correlation plot of the percentages of LC3-positive MPM cells (y axis, TFS grown in the presence of NH4+) relative to that of ATG13-positive MPM cells (x axis, TFS grown without NH4+) is shown. Arrows identify the position of the representative low autophagy TFS (#8, black circle) and high autophagy TFS (#2, gray circle), previously shown on Figures 4 and 5. Spearman rank correlation (rs), 0.8997; P (2-tailed)< 0.0001. (B) TFS grown in the presence or absence of NH4+ for 12 h were stained for ATG13 (green), LC3A/B (red), and nuclei (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. ATG13 and LC3A/B double immunostaining images of a representative TFS with high autophagy levels (TFS #2) grown in the presence (NH4+) or absence of the lysosomal inhibitor (CTRL) are shown. Zoom-in views of the regions in the dashed boxes are shown for representative cells. Scale bars: 10 µm.
In tumor fragment spheroids, autophagy initiation correlates with the autophagic flux. (A) TFS exposed to NH4+ were stained for LC3 and the same TFS not exposed to NH4+ were stained for ATG13; both were stained for KRT/cytokeratin to identify the mesothelioma cells. The correlation plot of the percentages of LC3-positive MPM cells (y axis, TFS grown in the presence of NH4+) relative to that of ATG13-positive MPM cells (x axis, TFS grown without NH4+) is shown. Arrows identify the position of the representative low autophagy TFS (#8, black circle) and high autophagy TFS (#2, gray circle), previously shown on Figures 4 and 5. Spearman rank correlation (rs), 0.8997; P (2-tailed)< 0.0001. (B) TFS grown in the presence or absence of NH4+ for 12 h were stained for ATG13 (green), LC3A/B (red), and nuclei (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. ATG13 and LC3A/B double immunostaining images of a representative TFS with high autophagy levels (TFS #2) grown in the presence (NH4+) or absence of the lysosomal inhibitor (CTRL) are shown. Zoom-in views of the regions in the dashed boxes are shown for representative cells. Scale bars: 10 µm.
In ex vivo tumor fragment spheroids, autophagy initiation (ATG13 puncta) correlates with that in the original formalin-fixed tumors
To test whether the levels of autophagy initiation measured in the TFS matched those of the original tumors from which they were generated, we performed ATG13 immunostaining in sections of the tumors used to generate the TFS we studied. Our results show that the percentage of MPM cells with ATG13 puncta in the TFS reflected that of the original tumors (Fig. 7A and B).
Figure 7.
In tumor fragment spheroids, autophagy initiation correlates with that of the original tumors. Fixed samples of the original tumors used to generate the analyzed 25 TFS were stained for ATG13 (green), KRT/cytokeratin (red) and nuclei (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) The correlation plot of the percentages of ATG13-positive MPM cells measured in formalin-fixed MPM clinical samples (y axis) relative to those measured in the respective TFS (x axis) is shown. Arrows identify the position of the representative low autophagy (MPM or TFS #8, black circle) and high autophagy (MPM or TFS #2, gray circle) tumor, previously shown in Figures 4,5, and 6. Spearman rank correlation (rs), 0.9253; P (2-tailed)< 0.0001. (B) Representative images of MPM sections corresponding to TFS with either low autophagy (MPM #8) or high autophagy (MPM #2) levels are shown, with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with ATG13 puncta (ATG13-positive MPM cells) indicated in parentheses. Zoom-in view of the region in the dashed box shows representative cells with ATG13 puncta (arrowhead). Scale bars: 10 µm.
In tumor fragment spheroids, autophagy initiation correlates with that of the original tumors. Fixed samples of the original tumors used to generate the analyzed 25 TFS were stained for ATG13 (green), KRT/cytokeratin (red) and nuclei (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) The correlation plot of the percentages of ATG13-positive MPM cells measured in formalin-fixed MPM clinical samples (y axis) relative to those measured in the respective TFS (x axis) is shown. Arrows identify the position of the representative low autophagy (MPM or TFS #8, black circle) and high autophagy (MPM or TFS #2, gray circle) tumor, previously shown in Figures 4,5, and 6. Spearman rank correlation (rs), 0.9253; P (2-tailed)< 0.0001. (B) Representative images of MPM sections corresponding to TFS with either low autophagy (MPM #8) or high autophagy (MPM #2) levels are shown, with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with ATG13 puncta (ATG13-positive MPM cells) indicated in parentheses. Zoom-in view of the region in the dashed box shows representative cells with ATG13 puncta (arrowhead). Scale bars: 10 µm.Thus, for each individual tumor, the autophagy initiation status of the ex vivo TFS, even after at least 2 wk in culture, closely resembles the autophagy initiation status of the original tumor, supporting the notion that the ex vivo TFS model is useful for studying autophagy in mesothelioma.
In patients with mesothelioma, ATG13, the marker of autophagy initiation, correlates with clinical outcome
To learn whether ATG13 puncta positivity could reveal useful information about tumors in patients with mesothelioma, we measured the percentage of cells with ATG13 puncta in tissue microarrays comprising clinical samples from a total of 109 MPM patients who had undergone surgical resection without prior chemotherapy. Overall, the median percentage of ATG13-positive MPM cells detected in our patient cohort was 8% (range 0% to 32%; inter-quartile range 2% to 19%). To assess the relationship of ATG13 positivity to patient outcome, we first compared Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival and time to recurrence following surgery among 4 groups comprising the ATG13 quartiles. An increasing proportion of tumor cells with punctate ATG13 staining was associated with incrementally improved survival functions. Next, we used Cox regression to determine the optimal cutpoint for a categorical parameter representing “high” and “low” levels of ATG13 positivity. We compared relative risk determined for death and recurrence at each of 18 candidate cutpoints defined by segmenting the inter-quartile range in 1% increments. Whereas the univariate hazard ratios associated with all candidate cutpoints within the interquartile range were similar for both overall survival (0.51 to 0.64) and time to recurrence (0.39 to 0.58), we selected the 6% cutpoint because it optimally minimized hazard ratios for both endpoints (univariate and with correction for tumor histology), and divided the cohort fairly evenly, with 58% of patients categorized high and 42% low ATG13 positivity (Fig. 8A).
Figure 8.
In formalin-fixed tissue microarray with tumor from 109 patients, ATG13 correlates with clinical outcome. (A) Cox regression analyses, univariate or with correction for the tumor histology, for death (OS) or recurrence (TTR) are shown. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals are shown at 18 candidate ATG13% cutpoints. M, median percentage of ATG13-positive MPM cells. C, selected cutpoint (6%). (B) Kaplan-Meier curves are shown for overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) at the 6% ATG13-positive MPM cells cutpoint selected in (A). (C) Correlation analysis of autophagy levels and known prognostic factors. ATG13 did not correlate with age, nodal status, gender or tumor volume, anemia, resectability, surgical procedure, adjuvant therapy, or TNM stage; high ATG13 positivity was more common in epithelioid tumors. (D) Multivariate analysis adjusted for the effect of epithelioid histology shows that ATG13 positivity remains significantly prognostic for TTR (P = 0.0017) and for OS (P = 0.0166), even after adjusting for the effect of histology. When conservatively corrected for the repeated measures required to establish the cutpoint, ATG13 positivity remains significantly prognostic for TTR (Bonferroni corrected P = 0.0306) but not for OS (corrected P = 0.2988).
In formalin-fixed tissue microarray with tumor from 109 patients, ATG13 correlates with clinical outcome. (A) Cox regression analyses, univariate or with correction for the tumor histology, for death (OS) or recurrence (TTR) are shown. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals are shown at 18 candidate ATG13% cutpoints. M, median percentage of ATG13-positive MPM cells. C, selected cutpoint (6%). (B) Kaplan-Meier curves are shown for overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) at the 6% ATG13-positive MPM cells cutpoint selected in (A). (C) Correlation analysis of autophagy levels and known prognostic factors. ATG13 did not correlate with age, nodal status, gender or tumor volume, anemia, resectability, surgical procedure, adjuvant therapy, or TNM stage; high ATG13 positivity was more common in epithelioid tumors. (D) Multivariate analysis adjusted for the effect of epithelioid histology shows that ATG13 positivity remains significantly prognostic for TTR (P = 0.0017) and for OS (P = 0.0166), even after adjusting for the effect of histology. When conservatively corrected for the repeated measures required to establish the cutpoint, ATG13 positivity remains significantly prognostic for TTR (Bonferroni corrected P = 0.0306) but not for OS (corrected P = 0.2988).At the 6% cutpoint, median overall survival was significantly longer for patients with high ATG13 positivity (≥6% ATG13-positive tumor cells; 17.4 mo) than for those with low positivity (<6 % ATG13-positive tumor cells; 10.6 mo) (P = 0.0009; Bonferroni corrected P=0.0162). Time to recurrence was also significantly longer for patients with high ATG13 positivity (13.7 mo) than for low positivity (6.6 mo) (P < 0.0001; Bonferroni corrected P < 0.0018) (Fig. 8B).ATG13 positivity was more commonly low among non-epithelioid tumors (P = 0.01), but was not correlated with other known prognostic factors including age, lymph node status, gender, tumor volume, anemia, resectability, surgical procedure, adjuvant therapy, or TNM stage (Fig. 8C). To address the possibility that histology was driving the outcome differences observed with ATG13, we performed a multivariate analysis adjusting for histology. In this analysis, after adjusting for histology, ATG13 positivity remained significantly prognostic for overall survival and time to recurrence (Fig. 8D). When applying a conservative correction for the multiple comparisons required to establish the cutpoint, ATG13 positivity level remained significantly prognostic for time to recurrence but not for overall survival (Fig. 8D).We conclude that the autophagy initiation, as assessed by the percentage of cells with ATG13 puncta, correlated with clinical outcome of patients with mesothelioma and provided prognostic information independent of its association with epithelioid histology, indicating that higher autophagy initiation is associated with better outcome. However, we acknowledge that validation of the selected cutpoint and effect sizes will be required in additional patient cohorts, given the known pitfalls of dichotomizing continuous covariates.
Discussion
Understanding the role of autophagy in cancer has proven to be challenging in part because of the difficulties in measuring it. In particular, new methods are needed to measure autophagy in formalin-fixed tumor samples because the evaluation of this dynamic process using static measurements can be misleading. According to recent guidelines, in order to confirm the level of autophagy, multiple markers of the autophagic process should be measured using different assays, but particularly with an assay of autophagic flux, which represents the overall autophagic degradation activity. However, the measurement of autophagic flux, which requires inhibition of the process and detection of the accumulation of LC3, cannot be performed in fixed tumors. In searching for a useful model, some investigators have turned to 3D models, which may exhibit the same autophagic status as that found in tumor, perhaps because the 3D environment may acquire the nutrient and metabolic stress faced by the actual tumor. Here, we used 3D models of mesothelioma, especially ex vivo tumor cultures, to measure autophagic flux and then leveraged that information to find a static marker of autophagy that correlated with the autophagic flux. With this novel marker, we were able to assess the level of autophagy in patienttumors and to show for the first time that higher autophagy in mesothelioma correlates with better clinical outcome.There has been an active effort to find a useful marker of autophagy in fixed tumor across many tumor types. In a search of the literature, we note more than 20 recent studies in which markers were sought in formalin-fixed tumor tissue and were used to correlate with patient outcome, including in breast cancer, colon cancer, melanoma, and ovarian cancer. These markers (e.g. LC3, BECN1, and ULK1) were mostly studied by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed tumor without the ability to validate them by inhibiting the autophagic process to measure autophagic flux. In some cases, the high expression of a marker correlated with poor prognosis; in others, high expression correlated with good prognosis. Without the ability to measure the autophagic flux in living tumor tissue, these studies have generally interpreted high expression of a protein as indicating a high autophagic flux, although, as has been noted, high expression could also mean an impaired autophagy, with accumulation of the upstream marker.In this study, our novel contribution is the use of 3D models to measure autophagic flux in order to find a static marker that would represent that flux and could then be used for measurement of autophagy in formalin-fixed tissue. We first turned to the mesothelioma cell lines, in 2D and 3D, and measured autophagic flux. Interestingly, the flux for each cell line was different in 2D and in 3D, leaving us to wonder which was the more clinically relevant and useful model. When we tested for a static marker in 2D or 3D cell cultures, neither the protein levels of BECN1 nor of ATG13 (Fig. S2) nor the levels of LC3B-II at baseline (Figs. 1 and 2) correlated with the autophagic flux. However, ATG13 puncta, which are a marker of ongoing autophagy initiation, appeared to correlate with the measured autophagic flux, but only in our 3D multicellular spheroids, not in 2D. Because of this and our previous work, we decided to expand our study of autophagy in 3D models by including ex vivo tumor. In the ex vivo tumor, we could actually measure autophagic flux and show that the flux correlated well with the percentage of mesothelioma cells with ATG13 puncta in the matching formalin-fixed tumor. Then, we tested this new static marker in a tissue microarray of formalin-fixed tumor of 109 patients and showed a strong and independent correlation of ATG13 puncta with clinical outcome, which encourages us that this experimental approach is worthwhile. This is the first time in any tumor, to our knowledge, that a marker was validated across several models, from the 3D in vitro to 3D ex vivo to paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumor. By the use of these complementary models, we found that ATG13 puncta reflect the autophagic flux and, most importantly, correlate with the outcome of patients with mesothelioma, especially with time to recurrence, a highly relevant clinical endpoint. We cannot say whether this marker would be useful for other tumors; however, we propose that ATG13 could be tested along with other proteins involved in the early phases of autophagy. The use of ex vivo tumor, if available, could help in discovery and validation of putative markers.In addition to an intertumoral heterogeneity, autophagy was also found to show intratumoral heterogeneity. Indeed, in other immunochemical studies of autophagy markers in tumor, heterogeneity of staining has been described. Here we can confirm, at baseline and then after the use of lysosomal inhibitors, that heterogeneity of autophagy within the mesothelioma tumor is a consistent finding. In every tumor examined, the autophagy markers (LC3 or ATG13 puncta) were present in a minority of mesothelioma cells, while the majority appeared to show little to no expression. We interpret this to mean that, in the ATG13-positive cells, autophagy is activated and not impaired, because LC3 accumulates as expected after lysosomal inhibition. In the ATG13-negative cells, autophagy is not activated and further investigation is required to learn whether autophagy can be stimulated in these cells, as it was in the cell lines by EBSS. The cells do not seem to differ in phenotype although they may differ in other ways such as the degree of proliferation or metabolic stress or the level of intracellular signaling. These cells could possibly represent stem-like or tumor-initiating cells, which are generally thought to have elevated levels of autophagy, and which are being studied in mesothelioma. Genetic or epigenetic heterogeneity could be responsible and thus could account for the finding that the derived TFS maintain the same percentage of ATG13 positivity as in the original tumor. Although the reasons are still to be uncovered, the intriguing aspect is that the percentage of ATG13-positive mesothelioma cells gives us novel information about this tumor by identifying 2 groups of patients with mesothelioma with a significantly different clinical outcome.For mesothelioma, this is the first study to show that autophagy correlates with outcome and to identify a marker, ATG13, which provides prognostic information independent of the major known prognostic factors such as age, node status, gender, tumor volume and histology. The prognostic information may derive from the autophagy itself or from an underlying difference in the tumor that is driving the autophagy. Although these findings will need to be confirmed in additional cohorts of patients, we suggest that ATG13 holds promise as a new and independent marker for mesothelioma. And, because one cannot directly measure the autophagic flux in the fixed tumor, we propose that confirmation of ATG13 puncta as a static marker of autophagic flux will require correlation with other static markers in fixed tumor and comparing those to the autophagic flux in the matching ex vivo tumor.Interestingly, our findings indicate that a higher autophagy initiation status correlates with better clinical outcome. Based on the current views of autophagy as having a dual role, both as a prosurvival and a tumor-suppressive process, we can speculate on possible reasons for this correlation. On the one hand, autophagy may be acting in a tumor-suppressive role, by playing a cytotoxic role during cancer therapy, or by activating the immune system. On the other hand, autophagy could be acting in a survival role, as suggested in studies of in vitro mesothelioma by our group. In this survival role, autophagy could be activated by and reflect underlying stresses in the tumor. Such stresses, such as nutrient deficiency, hypoxia, or uncontrolled proliferation, could render the tumor more sensitive to therapy and help explain why this group of patients has a better outcome. Thus, autophagy could be either a mechanism or a marker of better outcome and it will take further studies employing these models to clarify its role in this tumor.In conclusion, we have used 3D models of mesothelioma to identify a marker of autophagy that in turn has prognostic value in a group of patients with mesothelioma. Our hope is to use these models to explore the role of autophagy in this tumor.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
Unless otherwise specified, analytical grade chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. The following primary antibodies were employed in immunofluorescence or immunoblotting studies: rabbit monoclonal anti-ATG13 (Cell Signaling Technology, 13468), mouse monoclonal anti-BECN1/Beclin 1 (BD Biosciences, 612113), mouse monoclonal anti-KRT/cytokeratin clones AE1/AE3 (Dako North America, M3515), rabbit monoclonal anti-LC3B (Cell Signaling Technology, 3868), mouse monoclonal anti-LC3A/B (MBL Medical & Biological Laboratories, M152–3), and mouse monoclonal anti-TUBA/α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, T6074). The following secondary antibodies were employed in immunoblotting: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad, 170–6516), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Bio-Rad, 170–6515). The following secondary antibodies or fluorescent dyes were employed in immunofluorescence: Alexa Fluor 546goat anti-rabbit IgG (Life Technologies, A11010), biotinylated sheep anti-mouse IgG (GE Healthcare, RPN1001V ), NeutrAvidin Oregon Green 488 conjugate (Life Technologies, A6374), and TOPRO-3 iodide (Life Technologies, T3605).
Mesothelioma cell lines
Humanmesothelioma cell lines M28, REN, SARC, VAMT, JMN and MSTO-211H were grown from pleural liquid or tumor and originally obtained from colleagues or ATCC. They were all confirmed as mesothelial in origin by staining for mesothelioma markers (CALB2/calretinin, WT1) and negatively for other markers not seen in mesothelioma (TTF1). All cells were confirmed to be negative for mycoplasma every 2 mo by PCR analysis as previously described.
Monolayer cultures and lysosomal inhibition
Humanmesothelioma cell lines were cultured under standard conditions (37°C, 5% CO2) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. For study in parallel with MCS (see below), 3.2×105 cells were plated on 60-mm Petri dishes for 24 h. Then, for the next 24 h, the cells received fresh medium and, for the last 4 h or 8 h, where indicated, exposed to 10 mM NH4+ or 20 µM HCQ. NH4+ and HCQ are lysosomotropic compounds that act as weak bases increasing the lysosomal pH and, in turn, indirectly inhibiting the lysosomal proteases and the degradation of LC3-II in the autolysosomes. Note: Prolonged exposure to lysosomal alkalyzers, including NH4+, may result in the simultaneous inhibition of the last phase of autophagy and upregulation of autophagy. Thus, to measure the levels of autophagy, MCS and TFS have been exposed to NH4+ for no longer than 8 h and 12 h, respectively; a minimum of 12 h incubation has been suggested for ex vivo studies of autophagy.
Spheroid generation and lysosomal inhibition
Multicellular spheroids. MCS were generated in non-adsorbent round-bottomed 96-well plates, as previously described. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with a 5 mg/ml solution of polyHEMA (Sigma-Aldrich, P3932) in 95% ethanol and dried at 37°C for 48 h. Plates were sterilized with ultraviolet light for 30 min before use. 104 cells were added to each well and plates are centrifuged at 800 g for 5 min to bring the cells into contact at the bottom of each well. The plates were then placed in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2 for 24 h to allow spheroids to form. For the next 24 h, MCS (n = 32) were transferred to each well of a polyHEMA-coated 12-well plate, given fresh media and, for the last 4 or 8 h, where indicated, exposed to 10 mM NH4+ or 20 µM HCQ.Tumor fragment spheroids. TFS were generated as previously described, from fresh tumor specimens resected from chemonaive MPM patients (n = 25) by extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy procedures performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA, USA. First, pieces of approximately 0.5 mm3 were cut from 3 to 5 tumor sections of each patient, fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and processed for immunofluorescence staining as described below. Then, for ex vivo spheroid cultures, tumor tissue was diced finely with scalpels to pieces smaller than 1 mm in diameter. These TFS were cultured in 100 mm Petri dishes coated with 0.8% Noble agar (Sigma-Aldrich, A5431) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution for 2 or 3 wk. Then, for the study of autophagy, the TFS were studied for 24 h. At the start of the 24 h period, TFS (20 to 30) were transferred to each well of a polyHEMA-coated 24-well plate, exposed to fresh medium and, for the last 12 h, where indicated, exposed to 10 mM NH4+.
Immunoblotting
Monolayers or MCS were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; HyClone, SH30028). Cells were harvested in RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet P-40 [Sigma-Aldrich, 74385], 0.5% sodium deoxycholate [Sigma-Aldrich, 30970], 1% SDS [Sigma-Aldrich, L3771]) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific, 78442) and homogenized using an ultrasonic cell disruptor (Fisher Scientific). Protein concentration was assessed with DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, 500–0111) and equal amounts of protein (30 μg of total cell homogenates) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad, 162–0177). After blocking with 5% nonfat milk (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-2324), the filter was probed with designated primary and secondary antibodies and developed with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Thermo Scientific, 34080). Bands were imaged and subjected to densitometry using the BioSpectrum imaging system apparatus (UVP LLC, Upland, CA, USA) equipped with the Vision-WorksLS software (UVP LLC). Representative images and data of at least 3 independent experiments are shown.
Immunofluorescence
For all immunofluorescence studies, primary or secondary antibodies and fluorescent dyes were diluted in antibody diluent solution (EMD Millipore, 21544). In each experiment, for LC3 and ATG13 staining, a negative control with the relevant secondary antibody alone was included. Washes (3x) were performed with TBS (Amresco, 0788)-0.1% Tween 20 (Fisher Scientific, BP337) after each antibody incubation. For blocking, slides were incubated with 1% BSA (HyClone, SH30574) in TBS-0.1% Tween 20 for 30 min. For antigen retrieval, slides were incubated in citrate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, C999) and heated in a pressure cooker for 10 min. For nuclear staining, in the final staining step, all cells were incubated with TO-PRO-3 iodide (1:1000; Life Technologies, 910576) together with the secondary antibodies for 2 h. Coverslips or slides were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade (Life Technologies, P36930). Images were captured at 63x magnification with a Nikon C1 confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA).Monolayers. For ATG13 immunostaining, 4.5×104 cells were plated on coverslips placed in a 12-well plate and cultured for a total of 48 h before harvesting. Cells were washed in PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C, blocked and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-ATG13 antibody at 4° C (1:50). Cells were then incubated 2 h with Alexa Fluor 546goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:200). For LC3 immunostaining, in the shorter lysosomal inhibition experiments, cells were plated on coverslips as above for ATG13 and exposed to the indicated inhibitors for the last 4 h before harvesting; in the longer lysosomal inhibition experiments, cells were plated on 60 mm Petri dishes (as described in Monolayer cultures and lysosomal inhibition section), exposed to the indicated inhibitors for the last 8 h, and then trypsinized and cytospun onto glass slides (2×104 cells/slide). Cells on coverslips or on slides were then washed in PBS, fixed with cold methanol, blocked and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-LC3 antibody at 4°C (1:50). Cells were then incubated 2 h with Alexa Fluor 546goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:200).Multicellular spheroids. MCS were transferred to polyHEMA-coated 12-well plates. The cells were trypsinized and 2×104 cells were cytospun onto glass slides. Cells were then washed in PBS, blocked and processed for ATG13 or LC3 immunostaining as for 2D cultures.TFS and MPM tumor histology. TFS were collected, fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in 3% agarose. The agar pellets were embedded in paraffin. TFS and original MPM sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated using an ethanol gradient. In tumors, in which multiple different cell types are present, KRT/cytokeratin staining is used to identify the mesothelioma cells, as we have shown. For ATG13 and KRT/cytokeratin dual immunostaining, following antigen retrieval, sections were blocked and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-ATG13 antibody at 4°C (1:50); for staining mesothelioma cells, sections were incubated with mouse anti-KRT/cytokeratin AE1/AE3 antibody (1:200) for 1 h and, after washes, with biotinylated sheep anti-mouse IgG (1:200) for 1 h. Sections were then incubated 2 h with Alexa Fluor 546goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200) and NeutrAvidin Oregon Green 488 conjugate (1:200). For LC3 and KRT/cytokeratin dual immunostaining, following antigen retrieval, sections were incubated 10 min in cold methanol for cell permeabilization, washed 2x in PBS, blocked and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-LC3B antibody at 4°C (1:50); for staining mesothelioma cells, sections were incubated 1 h with mouse anti-KRT/cytokeratin clones AE1/AE3 antibody (1:200) for 1 h and, after washes, with biotinylated sheep anti-mouse IgG (1:200) for 1 h. Sections were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 546goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200) and NeutrAvidin Oregon Green 488 conjugate (1:200) for 2 h. For ATG13 and LC3 dual immunostaining, following antigen retrieval, sections were blocked and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-ATG13 antibody at 4°C (1:50); for staining LC3, sections were incubated with mouse anti-LC3A/B antibody (1:50) for 3 h and, after washes, with biotinylated sheep anti-mouse IgG (1:200) for 2 h. Sections were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 546goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200) and NeutrAvidin Oregon Green 488 conjugate (1:200) for 2 h.
Immunofluorescence puncta analysis
A punctum was defined as a LC3- or ATG13-positive mainly circular cytoplasmic structure of approximately 1 µm in diameter; this is thought to correspond to an autophagic vesicle (autophagosome or autolysosome) or an early autophagy structure (omegasome or phagophore). In mesothelioma cell lines, LC3 puncta were counted in a total of 100 cells for each condition (25 cells in 4 different fields from different experiments); in contrast, ATG13 puncta were not counted because they were not clearly discrete in all conditions. In tumor sections (TFS, original tumor sections, and tissue microarrays), neither LC3 nor ATG13 puncta were counted because they were not clearly discrete and thus could not be counted individually. Instead, the percentage of all mesothelioma cells (KRT/cytokeratin-positive cells) that showed any LC3 or ATG13 puncta was counted as a measure of autophagy. On average, 150 KRT/cytokeratin-positive cells were analyzed for the presence of LC3 or ATG13 puncta from 3 different spheroids (TFS), tumor sections (original tumor), or tumor cores (tissue microarrays). Images were captured using a Nikon C1 confocal microscope (Nikon instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA) at x63 magnification. Saved images were later counted in a blinded fashion by 2 investigators.
Patients with mesothelioma
Patients whose tumor samples were used in these studies were participants in a consented and Institutional Review Board-approved biorepository and clinical database (Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center protocol #98–063). They underwent surgical resection of MPM at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA without preoperative chemotherapy. Tissue cores of tumor from 109 patients were obtained from archival clinicalparaffin blocks and incorporated into tissue microarrays, sections of which were immunostained. Samples of fresh tumor tissue representing 25 patients were obtained from discarded portions of the resection specimen, deidentified and transferred in 4°C media by overnight courier for the preparation of ex vivo tumor fragment spheroids and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks for immunostaining. A comprehensive database of patient demographic, staging, treatment and outcome data was queried to annotate the tissue microarray. Patient age, gender, lymph node status, tumor histology, computed tomography-derived tumor volume (where available), preoperative anemia (World Health Organization criteria: hemoglobin <12 g/dL for women, <13 g/dL for men), resectability, surgical procedure (extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy and decortication), postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy prior to recurrence, pathological TNM stage, recurrence and vital status, recurrence-free interval and overall survival duration were obtained.
Tissue microarrays
Tissue microarrays were created by the pathology core facilities of the Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, with coded links to patient identity under protocol 98–063 (extrapleural pneumonectomy, n = 65; pleurectomy and decortication, n = 36; palliative tumor debulking, n = 6; open biopsy, n = 2). In addition to anonymous control cores, microarray blocks contained, per included patient, 3 cores of tumor and, if available, 3 cores of normal tissue obtained from selected areas of archival clinical blocks. Five-micron sections were adhered to charged slides and dipped in paraffin for preservation until ATG13 staining.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM), as appropriate. Differences between cells in 2D and 3D and between groups with low autophagy and high autophagy were analyzed by Student t test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. In correlation plots, correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the Spearman rank correlation (rs). A P (2-tailed) value < 0.0001 was considered significant. GraphPad Prism was employed for statistical analysis (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A putative optimal cutpoint to establish a binary categorical covariate representing ATG13 positivity was determined based on minimizing the hazard ratio for recurrence and death within the middle 2 quartiles using Cox regression. The Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the association of categorical levels of ATG13 positivity with established prognostic factors. Kaplan Meier estimation and log rank comparison of survival functions, and Cox proportional hazards regression, with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing required to establish the cutpoint, were used to evaluate the association of ATG13 positivity level with time to tumor recurrence and all-causes of death following surgery, independently and with adjustment for tumor histology. StatView version 4.5 software (Abacus Concepts) was used for outcome analyses.
Authors: Jônatas Bussador do Amaral; Paula Rezende-Teixeira; Vanessa Morais Freitas; Gláucia Maria Machado-Santelli Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Sebastian Alers; Antje S Löffler; Florian Paasch; Alexandra M Dieterle; Hildegard Keppeler; Kirsten Lauber; David G Campbell; Birgit Fehrenbacher; Martin Schaller; Sebastian Wesselborg; Björn Stork Journal: Autophagy Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 16.016
Authors: Anika Nagelkerke; Johan Bussink; Anneke Geurts-Moespot; Fred C G J Sweep; Paul N Span Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Ji Hye Choi; Young-Seok Cho; Yoon Ho Ko; Soon Uk Hong; Jin Hee Park; Myung Ah Lee Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: N Echeverry; G Ziltener; D Barbone; W Weder; R A Stahel; V C Broaddus; E Felley-Bosco Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Daniel J Klionsky; Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz; Sara Abdelfatah; Mahmoud Abdellatif; Asghar Abdoli; Steffen Abel; Hagai Abeliovich; Marie H Abildgaard; Yakubu Princely Abudu; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Khosrow Adeli; Timon E Adolph; Annagrazia Adornetto; Elma Aflaki; Galila Agam; Anupam Agarwal; Bharat B Aggarwal; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Javed N Agrewala; Alexander Agrotis; Patricia V Aguilar; S Tariq Ahmad; Zubair M Ahmed; Ulises Ahumada-Castro; Sonja Aits; Shu Aizawa; Yunus Akkoc; Tonia Akoumianaki; Hafize Aysin Akpinar; Ahmed M Al-Abd; Lina Al-Akra; Abeer Al-Gharaibeh; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Simon Alberti; Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez; Cristiano Alessandri; Muhammad Ali; M Abdul Alim Al-Bari; Saeb Aliwaini; Javad Alizadeh; Eugènia Almacellas; Alexandru Almasan; Alicia Alonso; Guillermo D Alonso; Nihal Altan-Bonnet; Dario C Altieri; Élida M C Álvarez; Sara Alves; Cristine Alves da Costa; Mazen M Alzaharna; Marialaura Amadio; Consuelo Amantini; Cristina Amaral; Susanna Ambrosio; Amal O Amer; Veena Ammanathan; Zhenyi An; Stig U Andersen; Shaida A Andrabi; Magaiver Andrade-Silva; Allen M Andres; Sabrina Angelini; David Ann; Uche C Anozie; Mohammad Y Ansari; Pedro Antas; Adam Antebi; Zuriñe Antón; Tahira Anwar; Lionel Apetoh; Nadezda Apostolova; Toshiyuki Araki; Yasuhiro Araki; Kohei Arasaki; Wagner L Araújo; Jun Araya; Catherine Arden; Maria-Angeles Arévalo; Sandro Arguelles; Esperanza Arias; Jyothi Arikkath; Hirokazu Arimoto; Aileen R Ariosa; Darius Armstrong-James; Laetitia Arnauné-Pelloquin; Angeles Aroca; Daniela S Arroyo; Ivica Arsov; Rubén Artero; Dalia Maria Lucia Asaro; Michael Aschner; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Atanas G Atanasov; Alicia K Au; Patrick Auberger; Holger W Auner; Laure Aurelian; Riccardo Autelli; Laura Avagliano; Yenniffer Ávalos; Sanja Aveic; Célia Alexandra Aveleira; Tamar Avin-Wittenberg; Yucel Aydin; Scott Ayton; Srinivas Ayyadevara; Maria Azzopardi; Misuzu Baba; Jonathan M Backer; Steven K Backues; Dong-Hun Bae; Ok-Nam Bae; Soo Han Bae; Eric H Baehrecke; Ahruem Baek; Seung-Hoon Baek; Sung Hee Baek; Giacinto Bagetta; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Hua Bai; Jie Bai; Xiyuan Bai; Yidong Bai; Nandadulal Bairagi; Shounak Baksi; Teresa Balbi; Cosima T Baldari; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Maria Ballester; Salma Balazadeh; Rena Balzan; Rina Bandopadhyay; Sreeparna Banerjee; Sulagna Banerjee; Ágnes Bánréti; Yan Bao; Mauricio S Baptista; Alessandra Baracca; Cristiana Barbati; Ariadna Bargiela; Daniela Barilà; Peter G Barlow; Sami J Barmada; Esther Barreiro; George E Barreto; Jiri Bartek; Bonnie Bartel; Alberto Bartolome; Gaurav R Barve; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Alakananda Basu; Henri Batoko; Isabella Batten; Etienne E Baulieu; Bradley L Baumgarner; Jagadeesh Bayry; Rupert Beale; Isabelle Beau; Florian Beaumatin; Luiz R G Bechara; George R Beck; Michael F Beers; Jakob Begun; Christian Behrends; Georg M N Behrens; Roberto Bei; Eloy Bejarano; Shai Bel; Christian Behl; Amine Belaid; Naïma Belgareh-Touzé; Cristina Bellarosa; Francesca Belleudi; Melissa Belló Pérez; Raquel Bello-Morales; Jackeline Soares de Oliveira Beltran; Sebastián Beltran; Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook; Mykolas Bendorius; Bruno A Benitez; Irene Benito-Cuesta; Julien Bensalem; Martin W Berchtold; Sabina Berezowska; Daniele Bergamaschi; Matteo Bergami; Andreas Bergmann; Laura Berliocchi; Clarisse Berlioz-Torrent; Amélie Bernard; Lionel Berthoux; Cagri G Besirli; Sebastien Besteiro; Virginie M Betin; Rudi Beyaert; Jelena S Bezbradica; Kiran Bhaskar; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Resham Bhattacharya; Sujoy Bhattacharya; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Md Shenuarin Bhuiyan; Sujit Kumar Bhutia; Lanrong Bi; Xiaolin Bi; Trevor J Biden; Krikor Bijian; Viktor A Billes; Nadine Binart; Claudia Bincoletto; Asa B Birgisdottir; Geir Bjorkoy; Gonzalo Blanco; Ana Blas-Garcia; Janusz Blasiak; Robert Blomgran; Klas Blomgren; Janice S Blum; Emilio Boada-Romero; Mirta Boban; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Philippe Boeuf; Barry Boland; Pascale Bomont; Paolo Bonaldo; Srinivasa Reddy Bonam; Laura Bonfili; Juan S Bonifacino; Brian A Boone; Martin D Bootman; Matteo Bordi; Christoph Borner; Beat C Bornhauser; Gautam Borthakur; Jürgen Bosch; Santanu Bose; Luis M Botana; Juan Botas; Chantal M Boulanger; Michael E Boulton; Mathieu Bourdenx; Benjamin Bourgeois; Nollaig M Bourke; Guilhem Bousquet; Patricia Boya; Peter V Bozhkov; Luiz H M Bozi; Tolga O Bozkurt; Doug E Brackney; Christian H Brandts; Ralf J Braun; Gerhard H Braus; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; José M Bravo-San Pedro; Patrick Brest; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Alfredo Briones-Herrera; V Courtney Broaddus; Peter Brodersen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Steven L Brody; Paola G Bronson; Jeff M Bronstein; Carolyn N Brown; Rhoderick E Brown; Patricia C Brum; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Daniele Bruno; Robert J Bryson-Richardson; Cecilia Bucci; Carmen Buchrieser; Marta Bueno; Laura Elisa Buitrago-Molina; Simone Buraschi; Shilpa Buch; J Ross Buchan; Erin M Buckingham; Hikmet Budak; Mauricio Budini; Geert Bultynck; Florin Burada; Joseph R Burgoyne; M Isabel Burón; Victor Bustos; Sabrina Büttner; Elena Butturini; Aaron Byrd; Isabel Cabas; Sandra Cabrera-Benitez; Ken Cadwell; Jingjing Cai; Lu Cai; Qian Cai; Montserrat Cairó; Jose A Calbet; Guy A Caldwell; Kim A Caldwell; Jarrod A Call; Riccardo Calvani; Ana C Calvo; Miguel Calvo-Rubio Barrera; Niels Os Camara; Jacques H Camonis; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Edward M Campbell; François-Xavier Campbell-Valois; Silvia Campello; Ilaria Campesi; Juliane C Campos; Olivier Camuzard; Jorge Cancino; Danilo Candido de Almeida; Laura Canesi; Isabella Caniggia; Barbara Canonico; Carles Cantí; Bin Cao; Michele Caraglia; Beatriz Caramés; Evie H Carchman; Elena Cardenal-Muñoz; Cesar Cardenas; Luis Cardenas; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Georges F Carle; Gillian Carleton; Silvia Carloni; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Leticia A Carneiro; Oliana Carnevali; Julian M Carosi; Serena Carra; Alice Carrier; Lucie Carrier; Bernadette Carroll; A Brent Carter; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Magali Casanova; Caty Casas; Josefina Casas; Chiara Cassioli; Eliseo F Castillo; Karen Castillo; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francesca Castoldi; Marco Castori; Ariel F Castro; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Javier Castro-Hernandez; Susana Castro-Obregon; Sergio D Catz; Claudia Cavadas; Federica Cavaliere; Gabriella Cavallini; Maria Cavinato; Maria L Cayuela; Paula Cebollada Rica; Valentina Cecarini; Francesco Cecconi; Marzanna Cechowska-Pasko; Simone Cenci; Victòria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; João J Cerqueira; Janete M Cerutti; Davide Cervia; Vildan Bozok Cetintas; Silvia Cetrullo; Han-Jung Chae; Andrei S Chagin; Chee-Yin Chai; Gopal Chakrabarti; Oishee Chakrabarti; Tapas Chakraborty; Trinad Chakraborty; Mounia Chami; Georgios Chamilos; David W Chan; Edmond Y W Chan; Edward D Chan; H Y Edwin Chan; Helen H Chan; Hung Chan; Matthew T V Chan; Yau Sang Chan; Partha K Chandra; Chih-Peng Chang; Chunmei Chang; Hao-Chun Chang; Kai Chang; Jie Chao; Tracey Chapman; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Samrat Chatterjee; Shail K Chaube; Anu Chaudhary; Santosh Chauhan; Edward Chaum; Frédéric Checler; Michael E Cheetham; Chang-Shi Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Jian-Fu Chen; Liam L Chen; Leilei Chen; Lin Chen; Mingliang Chen; Mu-Kuan Chen; Ning Chen; Quan Chen; Ruey-Hwa Chen; Shi Chen; Wei Chen; Weiqiang Chen; Xin-Ming Chen; Xiong-Wen Chen; Xu Chen; Yan Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Yue-Qin Chen; Zhefan Stephen Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhi-Hua Chen; Zhijian J Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Hanhua Cheng; Jun Cheng; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Wei Cheng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xiu-Tang Cheng; Yiyun Cheng; Zhiyong Cheng; Zhong Chen; Heesun Cheong; Jit Kong Cheong; Boris V Chernyak; Sara Cherry; Chi Fai Randy Cheung; Chun Hei Antonio Cheung; King-Ho Cheung; Eric Chevet; Richard J Chi; Alan Kwok Shing Chiang; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Roberto Chiarelli; Mario Chiariello; Nathalia Chica; Susanna Chiocca; Mario Chiong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Abhilash I Chiramel; Valerio Chiurchiù; Dong-Hyung Cho; Seong-Kyu Choe; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Kamalika Roy Choudhury; Norman S Chow; Charleen T Chu; Jason P Chua; John Jia En Chua; Hyewon Chung; Kin Pan Chung; Seockhoon Chung; So-Hyang Chung; Yuen-Li Chung; Valentina Cianfanelli; Iwona A Ciechomska; Mariana Cifuentes; Laura Cinque; Sebahattin Cirak; Mara Cirone; Michael J Clague; Robert Clarke; Emilio Clementi; Eliana M Coccia; Patrice Codogno; Ehud Cohen; Mickael M Cohen; Tania Colasanti; Fiorella Colasuonno; Robert A Colbert; Anna Colell; Miodrag Čolić; Nuria S Coll; Mark O Collins; María I Colombo; Daniel A Colón-Ramos; Lydie Combaret; Sergio Comincini; Márcia R Cominetti; Antonella Consiglio; Andrea Conte; Fabrizio Conti; Viorica Raluca Contu; Mark R Cookson; Kevin M Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Dale P Corkery; Nils Cordes; Katia Cortese; Maria do Carmo Costa; Sarah Costantino; Paola Costelli; Ana Coto-Montes; Peter J Crack; Jose L Crespo; Alfredo Criollo; Valeria Crippa; Riccardo Cristofani; Tamas Csizmadia; Antonio Cuadrado; Bing Cui; Jun Cui; Yixian Cui; Yong Cui; Emmanuel Culetto; Andrea C Cumino; Andrey V Cybulsky; Mark J Czaja; Stanislaw J Czuczwar; Stefania D'Adamo; Marcello D'Amelio; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Andrew C D'Lugos; Gabriella D'Orazi; James A da Silva; Hormos Salimi Dafsari; Ruben K Dagda; Yasin Dagdas; Maria Daglia; Xiaoxia Dai; Yun Dai; Yuyuan Dai; Jessica Dal Col; Paul Dalhaimer; Luisa Dalla Valle; Tobias Dallenga; Guillaume Dalmasso; Markus Damme; Ilaria Dando; Nico P Dantuma; April L Darling; Hiranmoy Das; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Santosh K Dasari; Srikanta Dash; Oliver Daumke; Adrian N Dauphinee; Jeffrey S Davies; Valeria A Dávila; Roger J Davis; Tanja Davis; Sharadha Dayalan Naidu; Francesca De Amicis; Karolien De Bosscher; Francesca De Felice; Lucia De Franceschi; Chiara De Leonibus; Mayara G de Mattos Barbosa; Guido R Y De Meyer; Angelo De Milito; Cosimo De Nunzio; Clara De Palma; Mauro De Santi; Claudio De Virgilio; Daniela De Zio; Jayanta Debnath; Brian J DeBosch; Jean-Paul Decuypere; Mark A Deehan; Gianluca Deflorian; James DeGregori; Benjamin Dehay; Gabriel Del Rio; Joe R Delaney; Lea M D Delbridge; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; M Victoria Delpino; Francesca Demarchi; Vilma Dembitz; Nicholas D Demers; Hongbin Deng; Zhiqiang Deng; Joern Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Melvin L DePamphilis; Channing J Der; Vojo Deretic; Albert Descoteaux; Laura Devis; Sushil Devkota; Olivier Devuyst; Grant Dewson; Mahendiran Dharmasivam; Rohan Dhiman; Diego di Bernardo; Manlio Di Cristina; Fabio Di Domenico; Pietro Di Fazio; Alessio Di Fonzo; Giovanni Di Guardo; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Luca Di Leo; Chiara Di Malta; Alessia Di Nardo; Martina Di Rienzo; Federica Di Sano; George Diallinas; Jiajie Diao; Guillermo Diaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Jared M Dickinson; Marc Diederich; Mélanie Dieudé; Ivan Dikic; Shiping Ding; Wen-Xing Ding; Luciana Dini; Jelena Dinić; Miroslav Dinic; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Marc S Dionne; Jörg H W Distler; Abhinav Diwan; Ian M C Dixon; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Ina Dobrinski; Oxana Dobrovinskaya; Radek Dobrowolski; Renwick C J Dobson; Jelena Đokić; Serap Dokmeci Emre; Massimo Donadelli; Bo Dong; Xiaonan Dong; Zhiwu Dong; Gerald W Dorn Ii; Volker Dotsch; Huan Dou; Juan Dou; Moataz Dowaidar; Sami Dridi; Liat Drucker; Ailian Du; Caigan Du; Guangwei Du; Hai-Ning Du; Li-Lin Du; André du Toit; Shao-Bin Duan; Xiaoqiong Duan; Sónia P Duarte; Anna Dubrovska; Elaine A Dunlop; Nicolas Dupont; Raúl V Durán; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sergey A Dyshlovoy; Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari; Leopold Eckhart; Charles L Edelstein; Thomas Efferth; Eftekhar Eftekharpour; Ludwig Eichinger; Nabil Eid; Tobias Eisenberg; N Tony Eissa; Sanaa Eissa; Miriam Ejarque; Abdeljabar El Andaloussi; Nazira El-Hage; Shahenda El-Naggar; Anna Maria Eleuteri; Eman S El-Shafey; Mohamed Elgendy; Aristides G Eliopoulos; María M Elizalde; Philip M Elks; Hans-Peter Elsasser; Eslam S Elsherbiny; Brooke M Emerling; N C Tolga Emre; Christina H Eng; Nikolai Engedal; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Agnete S T Engelsen; Jorrit M Enserink; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Mafalda Escobar-Henriques; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Makandjou-Ola Eusebio; Gemma Fabrias; Cinzia Fabrizi; Antonio Facchiano; Francesco Facchiano; Bengt Fadeel; Claudio Fader; Alex C Faesen; W Douglas Fairlie; Alberto Falcó; Bjorn H Falkenburger; Daping Fan; Jie Fan; Yanbo Fan; Evandro F Fang; Yanshan Fang; Yognqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Tamar Farfel-Becker; Mathias Faure; Gholamreza Fazeli; Anthony O Fedele; Arthur M Feldman; Du Feng; Jiachun Feng; Lifeng Feng; Yibin Feng; Yuchen Feng; Wei Feng; Thais Fenz Araujo; Thomas A Ferguson; Álvaro F Fernández; Jose C Fernandez-Checa; Sonia Fernández-Veledo; Alisdair R Fernie; Anthony W Ferrante; Alessandra Ferraresi; Merari F Ferrari; Julio C B Ferreira; Susan Ferro-Novick; Antonio Figueras; Riccardo Filadi; Nicoletta Filigheddu; Eduardo Filippi-Chiela; Giuseppe Filomeni; Gian Maria Fimia; Vittorio Fineschi; Francesca Finetti; Steven Finkbeiner; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Flavio Flamigni; Steven J Fliesler; Trude H Flo; Ida Florance; Oliver Florey; Tullio Florio; Erika Fodor; Carlo Follo; Edward A Fon; Antonella Forlino; Francesco Fornai; Paola Fortini; Anna Fracassi; Alessandro Fraldi; Brunella Franco; Rodrigo Franco; Flavia Franconi; Lisa B Frankel; Scott L Friedman; Leopold F Fröhlich; Gema Frühbeck; Jose M Fuentes; Yukio Fujiki; Naonobu Fujita; Yuuki Fujiwara; Mitsunori Fukuda; Simone Fulda; Luc Furic; Norihiko Furuya; Carmela Fusco; Michaela U Gack; Lidia Gaffke; Sehamuddin Galadari; Alessia Galasso; Maria F Galindo; Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Vincent Galy; Noor Gammoh; Boyi Gan; Ian G Ganley; Feng Gao; Hui Gao; Minghui Gao; Ping Gao; Shou-Jiang Gao; Wentao Gao; Xiaobo Gao; Ana Garcera; Maria Noé Garcia; Verónica E Garcia; Francisco García-Del Portillo; Vega Garcia-Escudero; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Marina Garcia-Macia; Diana García-Moreno; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; Patricia García-Sanz; Abhishek D Garg; Ricardo Gargini; Tina Garofalo; Robert F Garry; Nils C Gassen; Damian Gatica; Liang Ge; Wanzhong Ge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Cecilia Gelfi; Pascal Genschik; Ian E Gentle; Valeria Gerbino; Christoph Gerhardt; Kyla Germain; Marc Germain; David A Gewirtz; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Saeid Ghavami; Alessandra Ghigo; Manosij Ghosh; Georgios Giamas; Claudia Giampietri; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Gary E Gibson; Spencer B Gibson; Vanessa Ginet; Edward Giniger; Carlotta Giorgi; Henrique Girao; Stephen E Girardin; Mridhula Giridharan; Sandy Giuliano; Cecilia Giulivi; Sylvie Giuriato; Julien Giustiniani; Alexander Gluschko; Veit Goder; Alexander Goginashvili; Jakub Golab; David C Goldstone; Anna Golebiewska; Luciana R Gomes; Rodrigo Gomez; Rubén Gómez-Sánchez; Maria Catalina Gomez-Puerto; Raquel Gomez-Sintes; Qingqiu Gong; Felix M Goni; Javier González-Gallego; Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez; Rosa A Gonzalez-Polo; Jose A Gonzalez-Reyes; Patricia González-Rodríguez; Ing Swie Goping; Marina S Gorbatyuk; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Kıvanç Görgülü; Roxana M Gorojod; Sharon M Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Cecilia Gotor; Roberta A Gottlieb; Illana Gozes; Devrim Gozuacik; Martin Graef; Markus H Gräler; Veronica Granatiero; Daniel Grasso; Joshua P Gray; Douglas R Green; Alexander Greenhough; Stephen L Gregory; Edward F Griffin; Mark W Grinstaff; Frederic Gros; Charles Grose; Angelina S Gross; Florian Gruber; Paolo Grumati; Tilman Grune; Xueyan Gu; Jun-Lin Guan; Carlos M Guardia; Kishore Guda; Flora Guerra; Consuelo Guerri; Prasun Guha; Carlos Guillén; Shashi Gujar; Anna Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Andreas Günther; Anyonya R Guntur; Chuanyong Guo; Chun Guo; Hongqing Guo; Lian-Wang Guo; Ming Guo; Pawan Gupta; Shashi Kumar Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Veer Bala Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Asa B Gustafsson; David D Gutterman; Ranjitha H B; Annakaisa Haapasalo; James E Haber; Aleksandra Hać; Shinji Hadano; Anders J Hafrén; Mansour Haidar; Belinda S Hall; Gunnel Halldén; Anne Hamacher-Brady; Andrea Hamann; Maho Hamasaki; Weidong Han; Malene Hansen; Phyllis I Hanson; Zijian Hao; Masaru Harada; Ljubica Harhaji-Trajkovic; Nirmala Hariharan; Nigil Haroon; James Harris; Takafumi Hasegawa; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Jeffrey A Haspel; Volker Haucke; Wayne D Hawkins; Bruce A Hay; Cole M Haynes; Soren B Hayrabedyan; Thomas S Hays; Congcong He; Qin He; Rong-Rong He; You-Wen He; Yu-Ying He; Yasser Heakal; Alexander M Heberle; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Gudmundur Vignir Helgason; Vanessa Henkel; Marc Herb; Alexander Hergovich; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Agustín Hernández; Carlos Hernandez; Sergio Hernandez-Diaz; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Amaury Herpin; Judit Herreros; Javier H Hervás; Daniel Hesselson; Claudio Hetz; Volker T Heussler; Yujiro Higuchi; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; William S Hlavacek; Emmanuel A Ho; Idy H T Ho; Philip Wing-Lok Ho; Shu-Leong Ho; Wan Yun Ho; G Aaron Hobbs; Mark Hochstrasser; Peter H M Hoet; Daniel Hofius; Paul Hofman; Annika Höhn; Carina I Holmberg; Jose R Hombrebueno; Chang-Won Hong Yi-Ren Hong; Lora V Hooper; Thorsten Hoppe; Rastislav Horos; Yujin Hoshida; I-Lun Hsin; Hsin-Yun Hsu; Bing Hu; Dong Hu; Li-Fang Hu; Ming Chang Hu; Ronggui Hu; Wei Hu; Yu-Chen Hu; Zhuo-Wei Hu; Fang Hua; Jinlian Hua; Yingqi Hua; Chongmin Huan; Canhua Huang; Chuanshu Huang; Chuanxin Huang; Chunling Huang; Haishan Huang; Kun Huang; Michael L H Huang; Rui Huang; Shan Huang; Tianzhi Huang; Xing Huang; Yuxiang Jack Huang; Tobias B Huber; Virginie Hubert; Christian A Hubner; Stephanie M Hughes; William E Hughes; Magali Humbert; Gerhard Hummer; James H Hurley; Sabah Hussain; Salik Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Martina Hutabarat; Hui-Yun Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Antonio Ieni; Fumiyo Ikeda; Yusuke Imagawa; Yuzuru Imai; Carol Imbriano; Masaya Imoto; Denise M Inman; Ken Inoki; Juan Iovanna; Renato V Iozzo; Giuseppe Ippolito; Javier E Irazoqui; Pablo Iribarren; Mohd Ishaq; Makoto Ishikawa; Nestor Ishimwe; Ciro Isidoro; Nahed Ismail; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Eisuke Itakura; Daisuke Ito; Davor Ivankovic; Saška Ivanova; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; José M Izquierdo; Masanori Izumi; Marja Jäättelä; Majid Sakhi Jabir; William T Jackson; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Anne-Claire Jacomin; Elise Jacquin; Pooja Jadiya; Hartmut Jaeschke; Chinnaswamy Jagannath; Arjen J Jakobi; Johan Jakobsson; Bassam Janji; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Patric J Jansson; Jonathan Jantsch; Sławomir Januszewski; Alagie Jassey; Steve Jean; Hélène Jeltsch-David; Pavla Jendelova; Andreas Jenny; Thomas E Jensen; Niels Jessen; Jenna L Jewell; Jing Ji; Lijun Jia; Rui Jia; Liwen Jiang; Qing Jiang; Richeng Jiang; Teng Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Yu Jiang; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Eun-Jung Jin; Fengyan Jin; Hongchuan Jin; Li Jin; Luqi Jin; Meiyan Jin; Si Jin; Eun-Kyeong Jo; Carine Joffre; Terje Johansen; Gail V W Johnson; Simon A Johnston; Eija Jokitalo; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Leo A B Joosten; Joaquin Jordan; Bertrand Joseph; Dianwen Ju; Jeong-Sun Ju; Jingfang Ju; Esmeralda Juárez; Delphine Judith; Gábor Juhász; Youngsoo Jun; Chang Hwa Jung; Sung-Chul Jung; Yong Keun Jung; Heinz Jungbluth; Johannes Jungverdorben; Steffen Just; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Daniel Kaganovich; Alon Kahana; Renate Kain; Shinjo Kajimura; Maria Kalamvoki; Manjula Kalia; Danuta S Kalinowski; Nina Kaludercic; Ioanna Kalvari; Joanna Kaminska; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Keizo Kanasaki; Chanhee Kang; Rui Kang; Sang Sun Kang; Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Marc Kantorow; Orsolya Kapuy; Michalis V Karamouzis; Md Razaul Karim; Parimal Karmakar; Rajesh G Katare; Masaru Kato; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Anu Kauppinen; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Kiyoshi Kawasaki; Kemal Kazan; Po-Yuan Ke; Damien J Keating; Ursula Keber; John H Kehrl; Kate E Keller; Christian W Keller; Jongsook Kim Kemper; Candia M Kenific; Oliver Kepp; Stephanie Kermorgant; Andreas Kern; Robin Ketteler; Tom G Keulers; Boris Khalfin; Hany Khalil; Bilon Khambu; Shahid Y Khan; Vinoth Kumar Megraj Khandelwal; Rekha Khandia; Widuri Kho; Noopur V Khobrekar; Sataree Khuansuwan; Mukhran Khundadze; Samuel A Killackey; Dasol Kim; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Eun Young Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hak-Rim Kim; Hee-Sik Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Jin-Hoi Kim; Joungmok Kim; Ju Hwan Kim; Keun Il Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong-Jun Kim; Scot R Kimball; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Tomonori Kimura; Matthew A King; Kerri J Kinghorn; Conan G Kinsey; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Sergey L Kiselev; Shuji Kishi; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Yasushi Kitaoka; Kaio Kitazato; Richard N Kitsis; Josef T Kittler; Ole Kjaerulff; Peter S Klein; Thomas Klopstock; Jochen Klucken; Helene Knævelsrud; Roland L Knorr; Ben C B Ko; Fred Ko; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Hotaka Kobayashi; Satoru Kobayashi; Ina Koch; Jan C Koch; Ulrich Koenig; Donat Kögel; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Sepp D Kohlwein; Nur M Kocaturk; Masaaki Komatsu; Jeannette König; Toru Kono; Benjamin T Kopp; Tamas Korcsmaros; Gözde Korkmaz; Viktor I Korolchuk; Mónica Suárez Korsnes; Ali Koskela; Janaiah Kota; Yaichiro Kotake; Monica L Kotler; Yanjun Kou; Michael I Koukourakis; Evangelos Koustas; Attila L Kovacs; Tibor Kovács; Daisuke Koya; Tomohiro Kozako; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Anna D Krasnodembskaya; Carole Kretz-Remy; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Sabine Kuenen; Lars Kuerschner; Thomas Kukar; Ajay Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Deepak Kumar; Dhiraj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Shinji Kume; Caroline Kumsta; Chanakya N Kundu; Mondira Kundu; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Lukasz Kurgan; Tatiana G Kutateladze; Ozlem Kutlu; SeongAe Kwak; Ho Jeong Kwon; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Yong Tae Kwon; Irene Kyrmizi; Albert La Spada; Patrick Labonté; Sylvain Ladoire; Ilaria Laface; Frank Lafont; Diane C Lagace; Vikramjit Lahiri; Zhibing Lai; Angela S Laird; Aparna Lakkaraju; Trond Lamark; Sheng-Hui Lan; Ane Landajuela; Darius J R Lane; Jon D Lane; Charles H Lang; Carsten Lange; Ülo Langel; Rupert Langer; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn Laporte; Nicholas F LaRusso; Isabel Lastres-Becker; Wilson Chun Yu Lau; Gordon W Laurie; Sergio Lavandero; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Helen Ka-Wai Law; Rob Layfield; Weidong Le; Herve Le Stunff; Alexandre Y Leary; Jean-Jacques Lebrun; Lionel Y W Leck; Jean-Philippe Leduc-Gaudet; Changwook Lee; Chung-Pei Lee; Da-Hye Lee; Edward B Lee; Erinna F Lee; Gyun Min Lee; He-Jin Lee; Heung Kyu Lee; Jae Man Lee; Jason S Lee; Jin-A Lee; Joo-Yong Lee; Jun Hee Lee; Michael Lee; Min Goo Lee; Min Jae Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Stella Y Lee; Sung Bae Lee; Won Hee Lee; Ying-Ray Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Youngil Lee; Christophe Lefebvre; Renaud Legouis; Yu L Lei; Yuchen Lei; Sergey Leikin; Gerd Leitinger; Leticia Lemus; Shuilong Leng; Olivia Lenoir; Guido Lenz; Heinz Josef Lenz; Paola Lenzi; Yolanda León; Andréia M Leopoldino; Christoph Leschczyk; Stina Leskelä; Elisabeth Letellier; Chi-Ting Leung; Po Sing Leung; Jeremy S Leventhal; Beth Levine; Patrick A Lewis; Klaus Ley; Bin Li; Da-Qiang Li; Jianming Li; Jing Li; Jiong Li; Ke Li; Liwu Li; Mei Li; Min Li; Min Li; Ming Li; Mingchuan Li; Pin-Lan Li; Ming-Qing Li; Qing Li; Sheng Li; Tiangang Li; Wei Li; Wenming Li; Xue Li; Yi-Ping Li; Yuan Li; Zhiqiang Li; Zhiyong Li; Zhiyuan Li; Jiqin Lian; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Weicheng Liang; Yongheng Liang; YongTian Liang; Guanghong Liao; Lujian Liao; Mingzhi Liao; Yung-Feng Liao; Mariangela Librizzi; Pearl P Y Lie; Mary A Lilly; Hyunjung J Lim; Thania R R Lima; Federica Limana; Chao Lin; Chih-Wen Lin; Dar-Shong Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kurt M Lin; Kwang-Huei Lin; Liang-Tzung Lin; Pei-Hui Lin; Qiong Lin; Shaofeng Lin; Su-Ju Lin; Wenyu Lin; Xueying Lin; Yao-Xin Lin; Yee-Shin Lin; Rafael Linden; Paula Lindner; Shuo-Chien Ling; Paul Lingor; Amelia K Linnemann; Yih-Cherng Liou; Marta M Lipinski; Saška Lipovšek; Vitor A Lira; Natalia Lisiak; Paloma B Liton; Chao Liu; Ching-Hsuan Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Cui Hua Liu; Fang Liu; Hao Liu; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Hua-Feng Liu; Huifang Liu; Jia Liu; Jing Liu; Julia Liu; Leyuan Liu; Longhua Liu; Meilian Liu; Qin Liu; Wei Liu; Wende Liu; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Xingguo Liu; Xu Liu; Xuedong Liu; Yanfen Liu; Yang Liu; Yang Liu; Yueyang Liu; Yule Liu; J Andrew Livingston; Gerard Lizard; Jose M Lizcano; Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer; Matilde E LLeonart; David Llobet-Navàs; Alicia Llorente; Chih Hung Lo; Damián Lobato-Márquez; Qi Long; Yun Chau Long; Ben Loos; Julia A Loos; Manuela G López; Guillermo López-Doménech; José Antonio López-Guerrero; Ana T López-Jiménez; Óscar López-Pérez; Israel López-Valero; Magdalena J Lorenowicz; Mar Lorente; Peter Lorincz; Laura Lossi; Sophie Lotersztajn; Penny E Lovat; Jonathan F Lovell; Alenka Lovy; Péter Lőw; Guang Lu; Haocheng Lu; Jia-Hong Lu; Jin-Jian Lu; Mengji Lu; Shuyan Lu; Alessandro Luciani; John M Lucocq; Paula Ludovico; Micah A Luftig; Morten Luhr; Diego Luis-Ravelo; Julian J Lum; Liany Luna-Dulcey; Anders H Lund; Viktor K Lund; Jan D Lünemann; Patrick Lüningschrör; Honglin Luo; Rongcan Luo; Shouqing Luo; Zhi Luo; Claudio Luparello; Bernhard Lüscher; Luan Luu; Alex Lyakhovich; Konstantin G Lyamzaev; Alf Håkon Lystad; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Alvin C Ma; Changle Ma; Mengxiao Ma; Ning-Fang Ma; Quan-Hong Ma; Xinliang Ma; Yueyun Ma; Zhenyi Ma; Ormond A MacDougald; Fernando Macian; Gustavo C MacIntosh; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Sandra Maday; Frank Madeo; Muniswamy Madesh; Tobias Madl; Julio Madrigal-Matute; Akiko Maeda; Yasuhiro Maejima; Marta Magarinos; Poornima Mahavadi; Emiliano Maiani; Kenneth Maiese; Panchanan Maiti; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Barbara Majello; Michael B Major; Elena Makareeva; Fayaz Malik; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Walter Malorni; Alina Maloyan; Najiba Mammadova; Gene Chi Wai Man; Federico Manai; Joseph D Mancias; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Michael A Mandell; Angelo A Manfredi; Masoud H Manjili; Ravi Manjithaya; Patricio Manque; Bella B Manshian; Raquel Manzano; Claudia Manzoni; Kai Mao; Cinzia Marchese; Sandrine Marchetti; Anna Maria Marconi; Fabrizio Marcucci; Stefania Mardente; Olga A Mareninova; Marta Margeta; Muriel Mari; Sara Marinelli; Oliviero Marinelli; Guillermo Mariño; Sofia Mariotto; Richard S Marshall; Mark R Marten; Sascha Martens; Alexandre P J Martin; Katie R Martin; Sara Martin; Shaun Martin; Adrián Martín-Segura; Miguel A Martín-Acebes; Inmaculada Martin-Burriel; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Paloma Martin-Sanz; José A Martina; Wim Martinet; Aitor Martinez; Ana Martinez; Jennifer Martinez; Moises Martinez Velazquez; Nuria Martinez-Lopez; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Daniel O Martins; Joilson O Martins; Waleska K Martins; Tania Martins-Marques; Emanuele Marzetti; Shashank Masaldan; Celine Masclaux-Daubresse; Douglas G Mashek; Valentina Massa; Lourdes Massieu; Glenn R Masson; Laura Masuelli; Anatoliy I Masyuk; Tetyana V Masyuk; Paola Matarrese; Ander Matheu; Satoaki Matoba; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Pamela Mattar; Alessandro Matte; Domenico Mattoscio; José L Mauriz; Mario Mauthe; Caroline Mauvezin; Emanual Maverakis; Paola Maycotte; Johanna Mayer; Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Cristina Mazzoni; Joseph R Mazzulli; Nami McCarty; Christine McDonald; Mitchell R McGill; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Fionn McLoughlin; Mark A McNiven; Thomas G McWilliams; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Tania Catarina Medeiros; Diego L Medina; Lynn A Megeney; Klara Megyeri; Maryam Mehrpour; Jawahar L Mehta; Alfred J Meijer; Annemarie H Meijer; Jakob Mejlvang; Alicia Meléndez; Annette Melk; Gonen Memisoglu; Alexandrina F Mendes; Delong Meng; Fei Meng; Tian Meng; Rubem Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Carol Mercer; Anne E Mercier; Jean-Louis Mergny; Adalberto Merighi; Seth D Merkley; Giuseppe Merla; Volker Meske; Ana Cecilia Mestre; Shree Padma Metur; Christian Meyer; Hemmo Meyer; Wenyi Mi; Jeanne Mialet-Perez; Junying Miao; Lucia Micale; Yasuo Miki; Enrico Milan; Małgorzata Milczarek; Dana L Miller; Samuel I Miller; Silke Miller; Steven W Millward; Ira Milosevic; Elena A Minina; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Mehdi Mirzaei; Amit Mishra; Nandita Mishra; Paras Kumar Mishra; Maja Misirkic Marjanovic; Roberta Misasi; Amit Misra; Gabriella Misso; Claire Mitchell; Geraldine Mitou; Tetsuji Miura; Shigeki Miyamoto; Makoto Miyazaki; Mitsunori Miyazaki; Taiga Miyazaki; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Trine H Mogensen; Baharia Mograbi; Reza Mohammadinejad; Yasir Mohamud; Abhishek Mohanty; Sipra Mohapatra; Torsten Möhlmann; Asif Mohmmed; Anna Moles; Kelle H Moley; Maurizio Molinari; Vincenzo Mollace; Andreas Buch Møller; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Costanza Montagna; Mervyn J Monteiro; Andrea Montella; L Ruth Montes; Barbara Montico; Vinod K Mony; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Michael N Moore; Mohammad A Moosavi; Ana L Mora; Marina Mora; David Morales-Alamo; Rosario Moratalla; Paula I Moreira; Elena Morelli; Sandra Moreno; Daniel Moreno-Blas; Viviana Moresi; Benjamin Morga; Alwena H Morgan; Fabrice Morin; Hideaki Morishita; Orson L Moritz; Mariko Moriyama; Yuji Moriyasu; Manuela Morleo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose F Moruno-Manchon; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Elisa Motori; Andrea Felinto Moura; Naima Moustaid-Moussa; Maria Mrakovcic; Gabriel Muciño-Hernández; Anupam Mukherjee; Subhadip Mukhopadhyay; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Victoriano Mulero; Sylviane Muller; Christian Münch; Ashok Munjal; Pura Munoz-Canoves; Teresa Muñoz-Galdeano; Christian Münz; Tomokazu Murakawa; Claudia Muratori; Brona M Murphy; J Patrick Murphy; Aditya Murthy; Timo T Myöhänen; Indira U Mysorekar; Jennifer Mytych; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi; Massimo Nabissi; Péter Nagy; Jihoon Nah; Aimable Nahimana; Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Nakamura; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Shyam S Nandi; Meera Nanjundan; Monica Nanni; Gennaro Napolitano; Roberta Nardacci; Masashi Narita; Melissa Nassif; Ilana Nathan; Manabu Natsumeda; Ryno J Naude; Christin Naumann; Olaia Naveiras; Fatemeh Navid; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Francesca Nazio; Florentina Negoita; Thomas Neill; Amanda L Neisch; Luca M Neri; Mihai G Netea; Patrick Neubert; Thomas P Neufeld; Dietbert Neumann; Albert Neutzner; Phillip T Newton; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Charlene C W Ng; Tzi Bun Ng; Hang T T Nguyen; Long T Nguyen; Hong-Min Ni; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Zhenhong Ni; M Celeste Nicolao; Francesco Nicoli; Manuel Nieto-Diaz; Per Nilsson; Shunbin Ning; Rituraj Niranjan; Hiroshi Nishimune; Mireia Niso-Santano; Ralph A Nixon; Annalisa Nobili; Clevio Nobrega; Takeshi Noda; Uxía Nogueira-Recalde; Trevor M Nolan; Ivan Nombela; Ivana Novak; Beatriz Novoa; Takashi Nozawa; Nobuyuki Nukina; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Jesper Nylandsted; Tracey R O'Donovan; Seónadh M O'Leary; Eyleen J O'Rourke; Mary P O'Sullivan; Timothy E O'Sullivan; Salvatore Oddo; Ina Oehme; Michinaga Ogawa; Eric Ogier-Denis; Margret H Ogmundsdottir; Besim Ogretmen; Goo Taeg Oh; Seon-Hee Oh; Young J Oh; Takashi Ohama; Yohei Ohashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Vasileios Oikonomou; Rani Ojha; Koji Okamoto; Hitoshi Okazawa; Masahide Oku; Sara Oliván; Jorge M A Oliveira; Michael Ollmann; James A Olzmann; Shakib Omari; M Bishr Omary; Gizem Önal; Martin Ondrej; Sang-Bing Ong; Sang-Ging Ong; Anna Onnis; Juan A Orellana; Sara Orellana-Muñoz; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elena Ortona; Heinz D Osiewacz; Abdel-Hamid K Osman; Rosario Osta; Marisa S Otegui; Kinya Otsu; Christiane Ott; Luisa Ottobrini; Jing-Hsiung James Ou; Tiago F Outeiro; Inger Oynebraten; Melek Ozturk; Gilles Pagès; Susanta Pahari; Marta Pajares; Utpal B Pajvani; Rituraj Pal; Simona Paladino; Nicolas Pallet; Michela Palmieri; Giuseppe Palmisano; Camilla Palumbo; Francesco Pampaloni; Lifeng Pan; Qingjun Pan; Wenliang Pan; Xin Pan; Ganna Panasyuk; Rahul Pandey; Udai B Pandey; Vrajesh Pandya; Francesco Paneni; Shirley Y Pang; Elisa Panzarini; Daniela L Papademetrio; Elena Papaleo; Daniel Papinski; Diana Papp; Eun Chan Park; Hwan Tae Park; Ji-Man Park; Jong-In Park; Joon Tae Park; Junsoo Park; Sang Chul Park; Sang-Youel Park; Abraham H Parola; Jan B Parys; Adrien Pasquier; Benoit Pasquier; João F Passos; Nunzia Pastore; Hemal H Patel; Daniel Patschan; Sophie Pattingre; Gustavo Pedraza-Alva; Jose Pedraza-Chaverri; Zully Pedrozo; Gang Pei; Jianming Pei; Hadas Peled-Zehavi; Joaquín M Pellegrini; Joffrey Pelletier; Miguel A Peñalva; Di Peng; Ying Peng; Fabio Penna; Maria Pennuto; Francesca Pentimalli; Cláudia Mf Pereira; Gustavo J S Pereira; Lilian C Pereira; Luis Pereira de Almeida; Nirma D Perera; Ángel Pérez-Lara; Ana B Perez-Oliva; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Palsamy Periyasamy; Andras Perl; Cristiana Perrotta; Ida Perrotta; Richard G Pestell; Morten Petersen; Irina Petrache; Goran Petrovski; Thorsten Pfirrmann; Astrid S Pfister; Jennifer A Philips; Huifeng Pi; Anna Picca; Alicia M Pickrell; Sandy Picot; Giovanna M Pierantoni; Marina Pierdominici; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Karolina Pierzynowska; Federico Pietrocola; Miroslawa Pietruczuk; Claudio Pignata; Felipe X Pimentel-Muiños; Mario Pinar; Roberta O Pinheiro; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Paolo Pinton; Karolina Pircs; Sujan Piya; Paola Pizzo; Theo S Plantinga; Harald W Platta; Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala; Markus Plomann; Egor Y Plotnikov; Helene Plun-Favreau; Ryszard Pluta; Roger Pocock; Stefanie Pöggeler; Christian Pohl; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Marisa Ponpuak; Hana Popelka; Blagovesta Popova; Helena Porta; Soledad Porte Alcon; Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Martin Post; Malia B Potts; Joanna Poulton; Ted Powers; Veena Prahlad; Tomasz K Prajsnar; Domenico Praticò; Rosaria Prencipe; Muriel Priault; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Vasilis J Promponas; Christopher G Proud; Rosa Puertollano; Luigi Puglielli; Thomas Pulinilkunnil; Deepika Puri; Rajat Puri; Julien Puyal; Xiaopeng Qi; Yongmei Qi; Wenbin Qian; Lei Qiang; Yu Qiu; Joe Quadrilatero; Jorge Quarleri; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Debora Ragona; Michael J Ragusa; Nader Rahimi; Marveh Rahmati; Valeria Raia; Nuno Raimundo; Namakkal-Soorappan Rajasekaran; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Abdelhaq Rami; Ignacio Ramírez-Pardo; David B Ramsden; Felix Randow; Pundi N Rangarajan; Danilo Ranieri; Hai Rao; Lang Rao; Rekha Rao; Sumit Rathore; J Arjuna Ratnayaka; Edward A Ratovitski; Palaniyandi Ravanan; Gloria Ravegnini; Swapan K Ray; Babak Razani; Vito Rebecca; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; David Reigada; Jan H Reiling; Theo Rein; Siegfried Reipert; Rokeya Sultana Rekha; Hongmei Ren; Jun Ren; Weichao Ren; Tristan Renault; Giorgia Renga; Karen Reue; Kim Rewitz; Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos; S Amer Riazuddin; Teresa M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Romeo Ricci; Victoria Riccio; Des R Richardson; Yasuko Rikihisa; Makarand V Risbud; Ruth M Risueño; Konstantinos Ritis; Salvatore Rizza; Rosario Rizzuto; Helen C Roberts; Luke D Roberts; Katherine J Robinson; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; George G Rodney; Tiago Rodrigues; Vagner Ramon Rodrigues Silva; Amaia Rodriguez; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Nieves Rodriguez-Henche; Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Jeroen Roelofs; Robert S Rogers; Vladimir V Rogov; Ana I Rojo; Krzysztof Rolka; Vanina Romanello; Luigina Romani; Alessandra Romano; Patricia S Romano; David Romeo-Guitart; Luis C Romero; Montserrat Romero; Joseph C Roney; Christopher Rongo; Sante Roperto; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Philip Rosenstiel; Anne G Rosenwald; Kevin A Roth; Lynn Roth; Steven Roth; Kasper M A Rouschop; Benoit D Roussel; Sophie Roux; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Ajit Roy; Aurore Rozieres; Diego Ruano; David C Rubinsztein; Maria P Rubtsova; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Christoph Ruckenstuhl; Emil Rudolf; Rüdiger Rudolf; Alessandra Ruggieri; Avnika Ashok Ruparelia; Paola Rusmini; Ryan R Russell; Gian Luigi Russo; Maria Russo; Rossella Russo; Oxana O Ryabaya; Kevin M Ryan; Kwon-Yul Ryu; Maria Sabater-Arcis; Ulka Sachdev; Michael Sacher; Carsten Sachse; Abhishek Sadhu; Junichi Sadoshima; Nathaniel Safren; Paul Saftig; Antonia P Sagona; Gaurav Sahay; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mustafa Sahin; Ozgur Sahin; Sumit Sahni; Nayuta Saito; Shigeru Saito; Tsunenori Saito; Ryohei Sakai; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Kalle Saksela; Gloria Salazar; Anna Salazar-Degracia; Ghasem H Salekdeh; Ashok K Saluja; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Maria Cecilia Sanchez; Jose A Sanchez-Alcazar; Victoria Sanchez-Vera; Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu; J Thomas Sanderson; Marco Sandri; Stefano Santaguida; Laura Santambrogio; Magda M Santana; Giorgio Santoni; Alberto Sanz; Pascual Sanz; Shweta Saran; Marco Sardiello; Timothy J Sargeant; Apurva Sarin; Chinmoy Sarkar; Sovan Sarkar; Maria-Rosa Sarrias; Surajit Sarkar; Dipanka Tanu Sarmah; Jaakko Sarparanta; Aishwarya Sathyanarayan; Ranganayaki Sathyanarayanan; K Matthew Scaglione; Francesca Scatozza; Liliana Schaefer; Zachary T Schafer; Ulrich E Schaible; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schatzl; Catherine H Schein; Wiep Scheper; David Scheuring; Maria Vittoria Schiaffino; Monica Schiappacassi; Rainer Schindl; Uwe Schlattner; Oliver Schmidt; Roland Schmitt; Stephen D Schmidt; Ingo Schmitz; Eran Schmukler; Anja Schneider; Bianca E Schneider; Romana Schober; Alejandra C Schoijet; Micah B Schott; Michael Schramm; Bernd Schröder; Kai Schuh; Christoph Schüller; Ryan J Schulze; Lea Schürmanns; Jens C Schwamborn; Melanie Schwarten; Filippo Scialo; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Melanie J Scott; Kathleen W Scotto; A Ivana Scovassi; Andrea Scrima; Aurora Scrivo; David Sebastian; Salwa Sebti; Simon Sedej; Laura Segatori; Nava Segev; Per O Seglen; Iban Seiliez; Ekihiro Seki; Scott B Selleck; Frank W Sellke; Joshua T Selsby; Michael Sendtner; Serif Senturk; Elena Seranova; Consolato Sergi; Ruth Serra-Moreno; Hiromi Sesaki; Carmine Settembre; Subba Rao Gangi Setty; Gianluca Sgarbi; Ou Sha; John J Shacka; Javeed A Shah; Dantong Shang; Changshun Shao; Feng Shao; Soroush Sharbati; Lisa M Sharkey; Dipali Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Kulbhushan Sharma; Pawan Sharma; Surendra Sharma; Han-Ming Shen; Hongtao Shen; Jiangang Shen; Ming Shen; Weili Shen; Zheni Shen; Rui Sheng; Zhi Sheng; Zu-Hang Sheng; Jianjian Shi; Xiaobing Shi; Ying-Hong Shi; Kahori Shiba-Fukushima; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Makoto Shimozawa; Takahiro Shintani; Christopher J Shoemaker; Shahla Shojaei; Ikuo Shoji; Bhupendra V Shravage; Viji Shridhar; Chih-Wen Shu; Hong-Bing Shu; Ke Shui; Arvind K Shukla; Timothy E Shutt; Valentina Sica; Aleem Siddiqui; Amanda Sierra; Virginia Sierra-Torre; Santiago Signorelli; Payel Sil; Bruno J de Andrade Silva; Johnatas D Silva; Eduardo Silva-Pavez; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Rachel E Simmonds; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Matias Simons; Anurag Singh; Lalit P Singh; Rajat Singh; Shivendra V Singh; Shrawan K Singh; Sudha B Singh; Sunaina Singh; Surinder Pal Singh; Debasish Sinha; Rohit Anthony Sinha; Sangita Sinha; Agnieszka Sirko; Kapil Sirohi; Efthimios L Sivridis; Panagiotis Skendros; Aleksandra Skirycz; Iva Slaninová; Soraya S Smaili; Andrei Smertenko; Matthew D Smith; Stefaan J Soenen; Eun Jung Sohn; Sophia P M Sok; Giancarlo Solaini; Thierry Soldati; Scott A Soleimanpour; Rosa M Soler; Alexei Solovchenko; Jason A Somarelli; Avinash Sonawane; Fuyong Song; Hyun Kyu Song; Ju-Xian Song; Kunhua Song; Zhiyin Song; Leandro R Soria; Maurizio Sorice; Alexander A Soukas; Sandra-Fausia Soukup; Diana Sousa; Nadia Sousa; Paul A Spagnuolo; Stephen A Spector; M M Srinivas Bharath; Daret St Clair; Venturina Stagni; Leopoldo Staiano; Clint A Stalnecker; Metodi V Stankov; Peter B Stathopulos; Katja Stefan; Sven Marcel Stefan; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Alexander Steinkasserer; Harald Stenmark; Jared Sterneckert; Craig Stevens; Veronika Stoka; Stephan Storch; Björn Stork; Flavie Strappazzon; Anne Marie Strohecker; Dwayne G Stupack; Huanxing Su; Ling-Yan Su; Longxiang Su; Ana M Suarez-Fontes; Carlos S Subauste; Selvakumar Subbian; Paula V Subirada; Ganapasam Sudhandiran; Carolyn M Sue; Xinbing Sui; Corey Summers; Guangchao Sun; Jun Sun; Kang Sun; Meng-Xiang Sun; Qiming Sun; Yi Sun; Zhongjie Sun; Karen K S Sunahara; Eva Sundberg; Katalin Susztak; Peter Sutovsky; Hidekazu Suzuki; Gary Sweeney; J David Symons; Stephen Cho Wing Sze; Nathaniel J Szewczyk; Anna Tabęcka-Łonczynska; Claudio Tabolacci; Frank Tacke; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Mitsuo Tagaya; Haoran Tai; Stephen W G Tait; Yoshinori Takahashi; Szabolcs Takats; Priti Talwar; Chit Tam; Shing Yau Tam; Davide Tampellini; Atsushi Tamura; Chong Teik Tan; Eng-King Tan; Ya-Qin Tan; Masaki Tanaka; Motomasa Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Jingfeng Tang; Tie-Shan Tang; Isei Tanida; Zhipeng Tao; Mohammed Taouis; Lars Tatenhorst; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Allen Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; Joan M Taylor; Elena Tchetina; Andrew R Tee; Irmgard Tegeder; David Teis; Natercia Teixeira; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Kumsal A Tekirdag; Tewin Tencomnao; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexei V Tepikin; Pilar S Testillano; Gianluca Tettamanti; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Kathrin Thedieck; Arvind A Thekkinghat; Stefano Thellung; Josephine W Thinwa; V P Thirumalaikumar; Sufi Mary Thomas; Paul G Thomes; Andrew Thorburn; Lipi Thukral; Thomas Thum; Michael Thumm; Ling Tian; Ales Tichy; Andreas Till; Vincent Timmerman; Vladimir I Titorenko; Sokol V Todi; Krassimira Todorova; Janne M Toivonen; Luana Tomaipitinca; Dhanendra Tomar; Cristina Tomas-Zapico; Sergej Tomić; Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong; Chao Tong; Xin Tong; Sharon A Tooze; Maria L Torgersen; Satoru Torii; Liliana Torres-López; Alicia Torriglia; Christina G Towers; Roberto Towns; Shinya Toyokuni; Vladimir Trajkovic; Donatella Tramontano; Quynh-Giao Tran; Leonardo H Travassos; Charles B Trelford; Shirley Tremel; Ioannis P Trougakos; Betty P Tsao; Mario P Tschan; Hung-Fat Tse; Tak Fu Tse; Hitoshi Tsugawa; Andrey S Tsvetkov; David A Tumbarello; Yasin Tumtas; María J Tuñón; Sandra Turcotte; Boris Turk; Vito Turk; Bradley J Turner; Richard I Tuxworth; Jessica K Tyler; Elena V Tyutereva; Yasuo Uchiyama; Aslihan Ugun-Klusek; Holm H Uhlig; Marzena Ułamek-Kozioł; Ilya V Ulasov; Midori Umekawa; Christian Ungermann; Rei Unno; Sylvie Urbe; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Suayib Üstün; Vladimir N Uversky; Thomas Vaccari; Maria I Vaccaro; Björn F Vahsen; Helin Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg; Rut Valdor; Maria J Valente; Ayelén Valko; Richard B Vallee; Angela M Valverde; Greet Van den Berghe; Stijn van der Veen; Luc Van Kaer; Jorg van Loosdregt; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Wim Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marcos A Vannier-Santos; Nicola Vannini; M Cristina Vanrell; Chiara Vantaggiato; Gabriele Varano; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Máté Varga; M Helena Vasconcelos; Somya Vats; Demetrios G Vavvas; Ignacio Vega-Naredo; Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis; Guillermo Velasco; Ariadna P Velázquez; Tibor Vellai; Edo Vellenga; Francesca Velotti; Mireille Verdier; Panayotis Verginis; Isabelle Vergne; Paul Verkade; Manish Verma; Patrik Verstreken; Tim Vervliet; Jörg Vervoorts; Alexandre T Vessoni; Victor M Victor; Michel Vidal; Chiara Vidoni; Otilia V Vieira; Richard D Vierstra; Sonia Viganó; Helena Vihinen; Vinoy Vijayan; Miquel Vila; Marçal Vilar; José M Villalba; Antonio Villalobo; Beatriz Villarejo-Zori; Francesc Villarroya; Joan Villarroya; Olivier Vincent; Cecile Vindis; Christophe Viret; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Dora Visnjic; Ilio Vitale; David J Vocadlo; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Cinzia Volonté; Mattia Volta; Marta Vomero; Clarissa Von Haefen; Marc A Vooijs; Wolfgang Voos; Ljubica Vucicevic; Richard Wade-Martins; Satoshi Waguri; Kenrick A Waite; Shuji Wakatsuki; David W Walker; Mark J Walker; Simon A Walker; Jochen Walter; Francisco G Wandosell; Bo Wang; Chao-Yung Wang; Chen Wang; Chenran Wang; Chenwei Wang; Cun-Yu Wang; Dong Wang; Fangyang Wang; Feng Wang; Fengming Wang; Guansong Wang; Han Wang; Hao Wang; Hexiang Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Jianrong Wang; Jigang Wang; Jiou Wang; Jundong Wang; Kui Wang; Lianrong Wang; Liming Wang; Maggie Haitian Wang; Meiqing Wang; Nanbu Wang; Pengwei Wang; Peipei Wang; Ping Wang; Ping Wang; Qing Jun Wang; Qing Wang; Qing Kenneth Wang; Qiong A Wang; Wen-Tao Wang; Wuyang Wang; Xinnan Wang; Xuejun Wang; Yan Wang; Yanchang Wang; Yanzhuang Wang; Yen-Yun Wang; Yihua Wang; Yipeng Wang; Yu Wang; Yuqi Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhenyu Wang; Zhouguang Wang; Gary Warnes; Verena Warnsmann; Hirotaka Watada; Eizo Watanabe; Maxinne Watchon; Anna Wawrzyńska; Timothy E Weaver; Grzegorz Wegrzyn; Ann M Wehman; Huafeng Wei; Lei Wei; Taotao Wei; Yongjie Wei; Oliver H Weiergräber; Conrad C Weihl; Günther Weindl; Ralf Weiskirchen; Alan Wells; Runxia H Wen; Xin Wen; Antonia Werner; Beatrice Weykopf; Sally P Wheatley; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Katarzyna Wiktorska; Manon E Wildenberg; Tom Wileman; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Brett Williams; Robin S B Williams; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Richard A Wilson; Beate Winner; Nathaniel J Winsor; Steven S Witkin; Harald Wodrich; Ute Woehlbier; Thomas Wollert; Esther Wong; Jack Ho Wong; Richard W Wong; Vincent Kam Wai Wong; W Wei-Lynn Wong; An-Guo Wu; Chengbiao Wu; Jian Wu; Junfang Wu; Kenneth K Wu; Min Wu; Shan-Ying Wu; Shengzhou Wu; Shu-Yan Wu; Shufang Wu; William K K Wu; Xiaohong Wu; Xiaoqing Wu; Yao-Wen Wu; Yihua Wu; Ramnik J Xavier; Hongguang Xia; Lixin Xia; Zhengyuan Xia; Ge Xiang; Jin Xiang; Mingliang Xiang; Wei Xiang; Bin Xiao; Guozhi Xiao; Hengyi Xiao; Hong-Tao Xiao; Jian Xiao; Lan Xiao; Shi Xiao; Yin Xiao; Baoming Xie; Chuan-Ming Xie; Min Xie; Yuxiang Xie; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Maria Xilouri; Congfeng Xu; En Xu; Haoxing Xu; Jing Xu; JinRong Xu; Liang Xu; Wen Wen Xu; Xiulong Xu; Yu Xue; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop; Masamitsu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yamaguchi; Ai Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Shengmin Yan; Shian-Jang Yan; Zhen Yan; Yasuo Yanagi; Chuanbin Yang; Dun-Sheng Yang; Huan Yang; Huang-Tian Yang; Hui Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Jing Yang; Jingyu Yang; Ling Yang; Liu Yang; Ming Yang; Pei-Ming Yang; Qian Yang; Seungwon Yang; Shu Yang; Shun-Fa Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Xiaoyong Yang; Xuesong Yang; Yi Yang; Ying Yang; Honghong Yao; Shenggen Yao; Xiaoqiang Yao; Yong-Gang Yao; Yong-Ming Yao; Takahiro Yasui; Meysam Yazdankhah; Paul M Yen; Cong Yi; Xiao-Ming Yin; Yanhai Yin; Zhangyuan Yin; Ziyi Yin; Meidan Ying; Zheng Ying; Calvin K Yip; Stephanie Pei Tung Yiu; Young H Yoo; Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Saori R Yoshii; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Bahman Yousefi; Boxuan Yu; Haiyang Yu; Jun Yu; Jun Yu; Li Yu; Ming-Lung Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Victor C Yu; W Haung Yu; Zhengping Yu; Zhou Yu; Junying Yuan; Ling-Qing Yuan; Shilin Yuan; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Yanggang Yuan; Zengqiang Yuan; Jianbo Yue; Zhenyu Yue; Jeanho Yun; Raymond L Yung; David N Zacks; Gabriele Zaffagnini; Vanessa O Zambelli; Isabella Zanella; Qun S Zang; Sara Zanivan; Silvia Zappavigna; Pilar Zaragoza; Konstantinos S Zarbalis; Amir Zarebkohan; Amira Zarrouk; Scott O Zeitlin; Jialiu Zeng; Ju-Deng Zeng; Eva Žerovnik; Lixuan Zhan; Bin Zhang; Donna D Zhang; Hanlin Zhang; Hong Zhang; Hong Zhang; Honghe Zhang; Huafeng Zhang; Huaye Zhang; Hui Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianbin Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Kalin Y B Zhang; Leshuai W Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lisheng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Luoying Zhang; Menghuan Zhang; Peng Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiangnan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Xinxin Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yanjin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ying-Dong Zhang; Yingmei Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yuchen Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Zhibing Zhang; Zhihai Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Zili Zhang; Haobin Zhao; Lei Zhao; Shuang Zhao; Tongbiao Zhao; Xiao-Fan Zhao; Ying Zhao; Yongchao Zhao; Yongliang Zhao; Yuting Zhao; Guoping Zheng; Kai Zheng; Ling Zheng; Shizhong Zheng; Xi-Long Zheng; Yi Zheng; Zu-Guo Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Ao Zhou; Ben Zhou; Cefan Zhou; Gang Zhou; Hao Zhou; Hong Zhou; Hongbo Zhou; Jie Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jiyong Zhou; Kailiang Zhou; Rongjia Zhou; Xu-Jie Zhou; Yanshuang Zhou; Yinghong Zhou; Yubin Zhou; Zheng-Yu Zhou; Zhou Zhou; Binglin Zhu; Changlian Zhu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Haining Zhu; Hongxin Zhu; Hua Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Yanping Zhu; Yushan Zhu; Haixia Zhuang; Xiaohong Zhuang; Katarzyna Zientara-Rytter; Christine M Zimmermann; Elena Ziviani; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Dmitry B Zorov; Antonio Zorzano; Weiping Zou; Zhen Zou; Zhengzhi Zou; Steven Zuryn; Werner Zwerschke; Beate Brand-Saberi; X Charlie Dong; Chandra Shekar Kenchappa; Zuguo Li; Yong Lin; Shigeru Oshima; Yueguang Rong; Judith C Sluimer; Christina L Stallings; Chun-Kit Tong Journal: Autophagy Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 13.391
Authors: Duo Xu; Shun-Qing Liang; Zhang Yang; Haitang Yang; Rémy Bruggmann; Simone Oberhaensli; Sabina Berezowska; Thomas M Marti; Sean R R Hall; Patrick Dorn; Gregor J Kocher; Ralph A Schmid; Ren-Wang Peng Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 8.469