| Literature DB >> 27096291 |
Anastasi Kosmadopoulos1,2, David Darwent1, Gregory D Roach1.
Abstract
The accuracy of sleep/wake estimates derived with actigraphy is often dependent on researchers being able to discern non-wear times from sleep or quiescent wakefulness when confronted by discrepancies in a sleep log. Without knowing when an accelerometer is being worn, non-wear could be inferred from periods of inactivity unlikely to occur while in bed. Data collected in our laboratory suggest that more than 50% of inactive periods during time in bed are <8 min in duration. This duration may be an appropriate minimum threshold for routine non-wear classification during self-reported wake. Higher thresholds could be chosen to derive non-wear definitions for self-reported bedtimes depending on the desired level of certainty. To determine non-wear at thresholds of 75%, 95% and 99%, for example, would require periods of inactivity lasting ≥18 min, ≥53 min and ≥85 min, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Actigraphy; activity cycles; biostatistics; nonwear; physical activity; sedentary behavior; sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27096291 DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2016.1167720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chronobiol Int ISSN: 0742-0528 Impact factor: 2.877