| Literature DB >> 27095937 |
Jing Li1, Shu Wang2, Zeng-Feng Su2, Yuan Yuan2.
Abstract
K-ras is currently accepted as the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, including squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma). NSCLC patients with the K-ras mutation appear to be refractory to the majority of systemic therapies. In the present study, the in vitro antitumor effects and correlated molecular mechanisms of sorafenib combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed were explored in the K-ras mutation-positive NSCLC A549 cell line. Sorafenib was seen to exhibit dose-dependent growth inhibition in the A549 cells, while sorafenib combined with pemetrexed demonstrated a greater synergism compared with sorafenib combined with gemcitabine. Sorafenib arrested the cell cycle at the G1 phase, while gemcitabine and pemetrexed caused arrest at the S phase. The molecular mechanism of this synergism was due to the downstream signalling pathways, which were efficiently suppressed by sorafenib, therefore increasing the incidence of the entry of the chemotherapeutic drugs into the apoptotic pathways. Moreover, sorafenib and pemetrexed demonstrated stronger synergism, demonstrating that inhibiting the Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk and Ras/PI3K/Akt pathways concurrently may achieve improved antitumor effects.Entities:
Keywords: K-ras mutations; gemcitabine; lung cancer; pemetrexed; sorafenib; western blot
Year: 2016 PMID: 27095937 PMCID: PMC4829747 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2016.58499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Oncol (Pozn) ISSN: 1428-2526
Fig. 1In vitro effects of sorafenib, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed on proliferation of A549 cell lines. MTT assays were used to examine the inhibitory activities on cell proliferation. Each data point was repeated in more than three independent experiments
Fig. 2A549 cells were exposed to different combinations at IC50 levels. (OLYMPUS IX70 ×200 magnification). The anti-proliferative effects of sorafenib combined with pemetrexed were more pronounced than sorafenib combined with gemcitabine
Fig. 3The combination index (CI) value of the two combinations was calculated using the Chou-Talalay method. S+G means sorafenib and gemcitabine, S+P means sorafenib and pemetrexed. CI < 1 was detected in both of the two combinations; sorafenib and pemetrexed generated stronger synergistic effects
Fig. 4Flow cytometric analysis was applied to determine the alterations in cell cycle distributions in A549 cell lines. The concentrations of sorafenib, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed were used at IC50 levels. Columns in the diagram depict cell cycle phase distribution in A549 cells
Fig. 5The expression levels of downstream signalling pathways in A549 cells were evaluated by western blot analysis