| Literature DB >> 27095924 |
Huilei Cheng1, Yanqin Xi1, Xianna Chi1, Yanxia Wu1, Guizhi Liu2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the curative effect of fenofibrate on rats with experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) and its immunological mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: Th17 cell; Treg cell; experimental autoimmune myocarditis; myocardial tissues; rat
Year: 2016 PMID: 27095924 PMCID: PMC4829822 DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2016.58817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent Eur J Immunol ISSN: 1426-3912 Impact factor: 2.085
Primers for real-time RT-PCR
| Genes | Sense primer | Antisense primer |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5’-tatcagtccccttccttg-3’ | 5’-tcctgaacttctaacagctccacca-3’ |
|
| 5’-ccgagtagacctcatagtgacctt-3’ | 5’-cctattgaaatctgctgctctggtct-3’ |
|
| 5’-gcacactagcctggagtgca-3’ | 5’-tgtccgagtccagtaggtgct-3’ |
|
| 5’-gacgggctgaggttgtttta-3’ | 5’-actgtggcaagtttgtgctg-3’ |
|
| 5’-catatggtttttctacagcatga-3’ | 5’-tggttgaccgtacagagaagttt-3’ |
|
| 5’-gcttctctcaggcttttggtc-3’ | 5’-tggcttctttgactctgcttc-3’ |
|
| 5’-tcagacattcgggaagcagtg-3’ | 5’-attccgtctccttggttcagc-3’ |
|
| 5’-gctatgttgcctgctcttactg-3’ | 5’-tctggctgactgggaagtg-3’ |
|
| 5’-atcaccatcttccaggagcga-3’ | 5’-agccttctccatggtggtgga-3’ |
Fig. 1Body weight, heart weight, the ratio of heart weight/body weight (HW/BW), and mRNA expression level of ANP and BNP in heart tissues of rats (eight rats per group). A) Body weight and heart weight; B) the ratio of heart weight/body weight, HW/BW; C) ANP mRNA expression; D) BNP mRNA expression
Fig. 2Histopathological analysis of rat myocardial tissues by HE staining (original magnification 400×). A) Control group; B) EAM group; C) Fenofibrate group
Fig. 3mRNA expression levels of cytokines in heart tissues of each group (fold change relative to control group)
Fig. 4mRNA expression levels of cytokines in rat splenocytes in vitro (fold change relative to control group)
Semiquantitative analysis of NF-κB p50, p65, and PPAR-α protein expression in heart tissues
| Groups | NF-κB p50 | NF-κB p65 | PPAR-α |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 0.327 ±0.013 | 0.406 ±0.010 | 0.473 ±0.016 |
| EAM group | 1.035 ±0.041 | 1.354 ±0.037 | 0.565 ±0.023 |
| Fenofibrate group | 0.596 ±0.023 | 0.738 ±0.022 | 1.268 ±0.049 |
vs. control group, p < 0.05;
vs. EAM group, p < 0.05
Fig. 5Immunoblot analysis of NF-κB p50/p65 and PPAR-α protein