Literature DB >> 27095591

Effects of resistance training with blood flow restriction on haemodynamics: a systematic review.

Gabriel R Neto1,2,3, Jefferson S Novaes2, Ingrid Dias4, Amanda Brown2, Jeferson Vianna5, Maria S Cirilo-Sousa1,3.   

Abstract

This study systematically reviewed the available scientific evidence on the changes promoted by low-intensity (LI) resistance training (RT) combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and rate-pressure product (RPP). Searches were performed in databases (PubMed, Web of Science™ , Scopus and Google Scholar), for the period from January 1990 to May 2015. The study analysis was conducted through a critical review of contents. Of the 1 112 articles identified, 1 091 were excluded and 21 met the selection criteria, including 16 articles evaluating BP, 19 articles evaluating HR and four articles evaluating RPP. Divergent results were found when comparing the LI protocols with BFR versus LI versus high intensity (HI) on BP, HR and RPP. The evidence shows that the protocols using continuous BFR following a LIRT session apparently raise HR, BP and RPP compared with LI protocols without BFR, although increases significantly in BP seem to exist between the HI protocols when compared to LI protocols. Haemodynamic changes (HR, SBP, DBP, MBP, RPP) promoted by LIRT with BFR do not seem to differ between ages and body segments (upper or lower), although they are apparently affected by the width of the cuff and are higher with continuous BFR. However, these changes are within the normal range, rendering this method safe and feasible for special populations.
© 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990KAATSUzzm321990; haemodynamics; ischaemia; strength training; vascular occlusion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27095591     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  6 in total

1.  Current Trends in Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  Molly Cuffe; Joel Novak; Adnan Saithna; H Scott Strohmeyer; Emily Slaven
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Application and side effects of blood flow restriction technique: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of professionals.

Authors:  Victor Sabino de Queiros; Matheus Dantas; Gabriel Rodrigues Neto; Luiz Felipe da Silva; Marina Gonçalves Assis; Paulo Francisco Almeida-Neto; Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas; Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinôco Cabral
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Acute Cardiovascular Responses after a Single Bout of Blood Flow Restriction Training.

Authors:  Moisés M Picón; Iván M Chulvi; Juan-Manuel T Cortell; Juan Tortosa; Yasser Alkhadar; José Sanchís; Gilberto Laurentino
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 4.  Effect of Blood Flow Restriction on Functional, Physiological and Structural Variables of Muscle in Patients with Chronic Pathologies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Álvaro Jesús Reina-Ruiz; Alejandro Galán-Mercant; Guadalupe Molina-Torres; Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza; Rita Pilar Romero-Galisteo; Manuel González-Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Perceived Barriers to Blood Flow Restriction Training.

Authors:  Nicholas Rolnick; Kyle Kimbrell; Mikhail Santos Cerqueira; Ben Weatherford; Christopher Brandner
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-07-08

6.  Chronic Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Improves Objective Physical Function: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew J Clarkson; Anthony K May; Stuart A Warmington
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.