Literature DB >> 27095508

Rapid prototyping for patient-specific surgical orthopaedics guides: A systematic literature review.

Diana Popescu1, Dan Laptoiu2.   

Abstract

There has been a lot of hype surrounding the advantages to be gained from rapid prototyping processes in a number of fields, including medicine. Our literature review aims objectively to assess how effective patient-specific surgical guides manufactured using rapid prototyping are in a number of orthopaedic surgical applications. To this end, we carried out a systematic review to identify and analyse clinical and experimental literature studies in which rapid prototyping patient-specific surgical guides are used, focusing especially on those that entail quantifiable outcomes and, at the same time, providing details on the guides' design and type of manufacturing process. Here, it should be mentioned that in this field there are not yet medium- or long-term data, and no information on revisions. In the reviewed studies, the reported positive opinions on the use of rapid prototyping patient-specific surgical guides relate to the following main advantages: reduction in operating times, low costs and improvements in the accuracy of surgical interventions thanks to guides' personalisation. However, disadvantages and sources of errors which can cause patient-specific surgical guide failures are as well discussed by authors. Stereolithography is the main rapid prototyping process employed in these applications although fused deposition modelling or selective laser sintering processes can also satisfy the requirements of these applications in terms of material properties, manufacturing accuracy and construction time. Another of our findings was that individualised drill guides for spinal surgery are currently the favourite candidates for manufacture using rapid prototyping. Other emerging applications relate to complex orthopaedic surgery of the extremities: the forearm and foot. Several procedures such as osteotomies for radius malunions or tarsal coalition could become standard, thanks to the significant assistance provided by rapid prototyping patient-specific surgical guides in planning and performing such operations. © IMechE 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-specific guide; computer-aided surgery; orthopaedic instrumentation; rapid prototyping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27095508     DOI: 10.1177/0954411916636919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  4 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Digital Surgical Planning and Rapid Prototyped Surgical Guides in Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Gonçalves Schröder E Souza; Flavia de Souza Bastos; Valdeci Manoel de Oliveira; Alfredo Chaoubah
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2020-06-15

2.  A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Amirhossein Asfia; James I Novak; Mazher Iqbal Mohammed; Bernard Rolfe; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-03-20

3.  Evaluation of the contact surface between vertebral endplate and 3D printed patient-specific cage vs commercial cage.

Authors:  Renan Jose Rodrigues Fernandes; Aaron Gee; Andrew James Kanawati; Fawaz Siddiqi; Parham Rasoulinejad; Radovan Zdero; Christopher Stewart Bailey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  3D-Printed Patient-Specific ACL Femoral Tunnel Guide from MRI.

Authors:  Iain Rankin; Haroon Rehman; Mark Frame
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-02-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.