| Literature DB >> 27095416 |
Zhibiao Fu1, Daniel Baker2, Aili Cheng3, Julie Leighton1, Edward Appelbaum1, Juan Aon1.
Abstract
The principle of quality by design (QbD) has been widely applied to biopharmaceutical manufacturing processes. Process characterization is an essential step to implement the QbD concept to establish the design space and to define the proven acceptable ranges (PAR) for critical process parameters (CPPs). In this study, we present characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation process using risk assessment analysis, statistical design of experiments (DoE), and the multivariate Bayesian predictive approach. The critical quality attributes (CQAs) and CPPs were identified with a risk assessment. The statistical model for each attribute was established using the results from the DoE study with consideration given to interactions between CPPs. Both the conventional overlapping contour plot and the multivariate Bayesian predictive approaches were used to establish the region of process operating conditions where all attributes met their specifications simultaneously. The quantitative Bayesian predictive approach was chosen to define the PARs for the CPPs, which apply to the manufacturing control strategy. Experience from the 10,000 L manufacturing scale process validation, including 64 continued process verification batches, indicates that the CPPs remain under a state of control and within the established PARs. The end product quality attributes were within their drug substance specifications. The probability generated with the Bayesian approach was also used as a tool to assess CPP deviations. This approach can be extended to develop other production process characterization and quantify a reliable operating region.Entities:
Keywords: continued process verification; control strategy; critical process parameter; critical quality attribute; design space; multivariate Bayesian predictive approach; proven acceptable range; quality by design; reliable operating region
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27095416 DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Prog ISSN: 1520-6033