Literature DB >> 27095237

The Effect of Gabapentin Enacarbil on Pain Associated with Moderate-to-Severe Primary Restless Legs Syndrome in Adults: Pooled Analyses from Three Randomized Controlled Trials.

Neal Hermanowicz1, Aaron Ellenbogen2, Gordon Irving3,4, Mark Buchfuhrer5, Mark J Jaros6, Gwendoline Shang7, Richard Kim7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adults with moderate-to-severe primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) often experience painful dysesthesias, which may lead to impaired quality of life.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) on pain associated with moderate-to-severe primary RLS in adults.
METHODS: Data were pooled from three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials (NCT00298623, NCT00365352, NCT01332305) for adults receiving GEn or placebo once daily. Change in average daily RLS pain score and a combined International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS)-pain response were examined.
RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat population included 671 adults (placebo, n = 244; GEn 600 mg, n = 161; GEn 1200 mg, n = 266). Both GEn doses significantly improved average daily RLS pain score at week 12 (p < 0.001 for GEn 600 mg vs. placebo and GEn 1200 mg vs. placebo). The combined IRLS-pain response subanalysis included 366 patients with a baseline IRLS total score ≥15 and pain score ≥4 (placebo, n = 133; GEn 600 mg, n = 86; GEn 1200 mg, n = 147). Most patients were both IRLS and pain responders (placebo, 40 %; GEn 600 mg, 70 %; GEn 1200 mg, 67 %). Spearman rank correlations between IRLS total and pain score (change from baseline to week 12) were moderate or strong. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence (placebo, 5 %; GEn 600 mg, 20 %; GEn 1200 mg, 23 %) and dizziness (placebo, 4 %; GEn 600 mg, 13 %; GEn 1200 mg, 22 %).
CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc pooled analysis suggests that GEn (600 and 1200 mg) once daily significantly improved pain associated with moderate-to-severe primary RLS in adults; however, the analysis was not powered to detect statistical differences between the two GEn doses. Numerically, more GEn-treated patients had a combined IRLS-pain response than placebo-treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27095237     DOI: 10.1007/s40263-016-0333-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  38 in total

1.  Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale.

Authors:  E J Gallagher; M Liebman; P E Bijur
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study to assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with restless legs syndrome.

Authors:  Ritu Lal; Aaron Ellenbogen; Dan Chen; Katie Zomorodi; Harisha Atluri; Wendy Luo; James Tovera; Janet Hurt; Daniel Bonzo; Marie-Liesse Lassauzet; Amanda Vu; Kenneth C Cundy
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.592

3.  Treatment response to sleep, pain, and mood disturbance and their correlation with sleep disturbance in adult patients with moderate-to-severe primary restless legs syndrome: Pooled analyses from 3 trials of gabapentin enacarbil.

Authors:  Richard K Bogan; Daniel O Lee; Mark J Buchfuhrer; Mark J Jaros; Richard Kim; Gwendoline Shang
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  Restless legs syndrome prevalence and impact: REST general population study.

Authors:  Richard P Allen; Arthur S Walters; Jacques Montplaisir; Wayne Hening; Andrew Myers; Timothy J Bell; Luigi Ferini-Strambi
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-13

5.  Impulse control disorders with the use of dopaminergic agents in restless legs syndrome: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jason R Cornelius; Maja Tippmann-Peikert; Nancy L Slocumb; Courtney F Frerichs; Michael H Silber
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid], a novel gabapentin prodrug: II. Improved oral bioavailability, dose proportionality, and colonic absorption compared with gabapentin in rats and monkeys.

Authors:  Kenneth C Cundy; Thamil Annamalai; Lin Bu; Josephine De Vera; Jenny Estrela; Wendy Luo; Payal Shirsat; Allan Torneros; Fenmei Yao; Joan Zou; Ronald W Barrett; Mark A Gallop
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Augmentation and tolerance with long-term pramipexole treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS).

Authors:  John W Winkelman; Lindsay Johnston
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  The Effect of Gabapentin Enacarbil on Quality of Life and Mood Outcomes in a Pooled Population of Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Primary Restless Legs Syndrome.

Authors:  Alon Y Avidan; Daniel Lee; Margaret Park; Mark J Jaros; Gwendoline Shang; Richard Kim
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Relationship between intensity and relief in patients with acute severe pain.

Authors:  Steven L Bernstein; Polly E Bijur; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Physician-diagnosed restless legs syndrome in a large sample of primary medical care patients in western Europe: Prevalence and characteristics.

Authors:  Richard P Allen; Paul Stillman; Andrew J Myers
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effect of Gabapentin Enacarbil on Quality of Life and Mood Outcomes in a Pooled Population of Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Primary Restless Legs Syndrome.

Authors:  Alon Y Avidan; Daniel Lee; Margaret Park; Mark J Jaros; Gwendoline Shang; Richard Kim
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Gabapentin Enacarbil: A Review in Restless Legs Syndrome.

Authors:  Esther S Kim; Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.