Literature DB >> 27095154

Comparison of consultation-liaison psychiatry services for inner-city, district or regional general hospitals using a common tool: Does one size fit all?

Anne P F Wand1, Rebecca Wood2, Matthew D Macfarlane3, Glenn E Hunt2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) services vary in terms of structure, function and responsiveness. It is not known whether evaluation measurements can be meaningfully compared across different CLP services to assess value and efficiency. The aim was to develop and test a common tool for measuring process and outcome measures in CLP.
METHODS: A data collection tool was developed using the literature and consultation with CLP clinicians. The tool was used to prospectively gather referral data, response times, health utilisation data and functional outcomes for individuals referred over seven months to three different CLP teams, servicing inner city, district and regional areas.
RESULTS: The structure, staffing, liaison attachments and scope of practice varied between the services. The regional CLP service attended seven hospitals and had the highest referral rate and largest inpatient population pool. The three services received referrals for similar reasons and made similar diagnoses. Multimodal management was the norm, and CLP facilitated follow-up arrangements upon discharge. Only the district CLP service saw all emergency referrals within an hour. Age and need for an interpreter did not affect response times.
CONCLUSION: Despite local differences in geography, CLP roles, hospital and community mental health service pathways and patient populations, the CLP data collection tool was applicable across sites. Staff resourcing and referral demand are key determinants of CLP response times.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consultation–liaison psychiatry; Evaluation; Lagtime; Measurement; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27095154     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  2 in total

1.  A programme theory for liaison mental health services in England.

Authors:  Allan House; Elspeth Guthrie; Andrew Walker; Jenny Hewsion; Peter Trigwell; Cathy Brennan; Mike Crawford; Carolyn Czoski Murray; Matt Fossey; Claire Hulme; Adam Martin; Alan Quirk; Sandy Tubeuf
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Services in Ireland: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Anne M Doherty; Rosie Plunkett; Katherine McEvoy; Eric Kelleher; Maurice Clancy; Elizabeth Barrett; Elaine Greene; Eugene Cassidy; William Lee; Siobhan MacHale
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.