Literature DB >> 27095076

Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.

Bernd Hänfling1, Lori Lawson Handley1, Daniel S Read2, Christoph Hahn1, Jianlong Li1, Paul Nichols1, Rosetta C Blackman1, Anna Oliver2, Ian J Winfield3.   

Abstract

Organisms continuously release DNA into their environments via shed cells, excreta, gametes and decaying material. Analysis of this 'environmental DNA' (eDNA) is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring. eDNA outperforms many established survey methods for targeted detection of single species, but few studies have investigated how well eDNA reflects whole communities of organisms in natural environments. We investigated whether eDNA can recover accurate qualitative and quantitative information about fish communities in large lakes, by comparison to the most comprehensive long-term gill-net data set available in the UK. Seventy-eight 2L water samples were collected along depth profile transects, gill-net sites and from the shoreline in three large, deep lakes (Windermere, Bassenthwaite Lake and Derwent Water) in the English Lake District. Water samples were assayed by eDNA metabarcoding of the mitochondrial 12S and cytochrome b regions. Fourteen of the 16 species historically recorded in Windermere were detected using eDNA, compared to four species in the most recent gill-net survey, demonstrating eDNA is extremely sensitive for detecting species. A key question for biodiversity monitoring is whether eDNA can accurately estimate abundance. To test this, we used the number of sequence reads per species and the proportion of sampling sites in which a species was detected with eDNA (i.e. site occupancy) as proxies for abundance. eDNA abundance data consistently correlated with rank abundance estimates from established surveys. These results demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can describe fish communities in large lakes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and has great potential as a complementary tool to established monitoring methods.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EC Water Framework Directive; eDNA; environmental DNA; fish monitoring; lakes; lentic systems; metabarcoding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27095076     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  49 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of a freshwater eukaryotic plankton community revealed via 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding.

Authors:  A Banerji; M Bagley; M Elk; E Pilgrim; J Marinson; J Santo Domingo
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribution from open ocean environmental DNA.

Authors:  Zeshu Yu; Shin-Ichi Ito; Marty Kwok-Shing Wong; Susumu Yoshizawa; Jun Inoue; Sachihiko Itoh; Ryuji Yukami; Kazuo Ishikawa; Chenying Guo; Minoru Ijichi; Susumu Hyodo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Comparison of Larval Fish Detections Using Morphology-Based Taxonomy versus High-Throughput Sequencing for Invasive Species Early Detection.

Authors:  Joel Christopher Hoffman; Christy Meredith; Erik Pilgrim; Anett Trebitz; Chelsea Hatzenbuhler; John Russell Kelly; Gregory Peterson; Julie Lietz; Sara Okum; John Martinson
Journal:  Can J Fish Aquat Sci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.102

4.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Ashley M Reaume; Emily Farrell; Michelle R Gaither
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Mapping biodiversity hotspots of fish communities in subtropical streams through environmental DNA.

Authors:  Rosetta C Blackman; Maslin Osathanunkul; Jeanine Brantschen; Cristina Di Muri; Lynsey R Harper; Elvira Mächler; Bernd Hänfling; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Environmental DNA (eDNA) Detection Probability Is Influenced by Seasonal Activity of Organisms.

Authors:  Lesley S de Souza; James C Godwin; Mark A Renshaw; Eric Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity.

Authors:  Iliana Bista; Gary R Carvalho; Kerry Walsh; Mathew Seymour; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Delphine Lallias; Martin Christmas; Simon Creer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Environmental DNA reveals tropical shark diversity in contrasting levels of anthropogenic impact.

Authors:  Judith Bakker; Owen S Wangensteen; Demian D Chapman; Germain Boussarie; Dayne Buddo; Tristan L Guttridge; Heidi Hertler; David Mouillot; Laurent Vigliola; Stefano Mariani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A new molecular diagnostic tool for surveying and monitoring Triops cancriformis populations.

Authors:  Graham S Sellers; Larry R Griffin; Bernd Hänfling; Africa Gómez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks.

Authors:  Lu Shu; Arne Ludwig; Zuogang Peng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.