| Literature DB >> 27094820 |
M Valdés Hernández1,2, M Allerhand2, A Glatz1, L Clayson3, S Muñoz Maniega1,2, A Gow2,4, N Royle2, M Bastin1,2, J Starr2, I Deary2, J Wardlaw1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: MRI; ageing; cognition; iron deposits; white matter hyperintensities
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27094820 PMCID: PMC4950475 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Neurol ISSN: 1351-5101 Impact factor: 6.089
Figure 1Schematic representation of brain iron regulation mechanisms as detailed in McCarthy and Kosman 5 (FPN, ferroportin; bMVECs, brain microvascular endothelial cells). Celuroplasmin, released from glial cells, promotes the removal of iron from the brain via ferroportin, an exporter located in the microvascular endothelial cells, with hepcidin being a negative regulator of ferroportin. Glial fibrillary acidic protein‐positive cells express hepcidin. Hepcidin binds to and induces ubiquitination of FPN triggering FPN internalization and degradation. By this mechanism, the interaction of hepcidin with ferroportin regulates the flow of iron into plasma, and thereby regulates the iron distribution.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the types and sources of mineral deposits found in brains of older adults: gradual iron deposition in tissue and brain microbleeds mainly determined by dysfunction in the permeability of the vessel wall and vessel rupture respectively; and calcifications.
Figure 3The three‐variable non‐recursive causal model to explore the mediating role of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on the effect that brain iron deposits(IDs) have on cognition in the elderly. Path a explores whether variations in the amount of IDs account for variations in the WMH load, path b explores whether variations in the WMH load account for variations in the cognitive outcomes, and path c explores the direct effect of IDs on cognition.
Imaging and cognitive variables considered in the analyses
| Parameter | Mean | Standard deviation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total | |
| General cognition (i.e. g) | −0.020 | 0.054 | 0.014 | 1.074 | 0.927 | 1.007 |
| Processing speed (i.e. g‐speed) | −0.047 | 0.058 | 0.003 | 1.064 | 0.964 | 1.018 |
| General memory (i.e. g‐memory) | −0.094 | 0.109 | 0.003 | 1.073 | 0.950 | 1.020 |
| Brain tissue volume (ml) | 1173.869 | 1068.147 | 1123.980 | 98.396 | 86.472 | 106.858 |
| Intracranial volume (ml) | 1535.940 | 1355.658 | 1450.977 | 113.098 | 102.006 | 140.571 |
| Median | Interquartile range | |||||
| Volume of IDs in the corpus striatum (ml)a | 0.082 | 0.094 | 0.088 | 0.224 | 0.222 | 0.224 |
| Volume of IDs in the brain stem (ml)a | 0.086 | 0.102 | 0.091 | 0.111 | 0.123 | 0.120 |
| Volume of IDs elsewhere (ml)a | 0.022 | 0.028 | 0.026 | 0.122 | 0.113 | 0.120 |
| Total volume of IDs (ml) | 0.046 | 0.036 | 0.040 | 0.201 | 0.187 | 0.196 |
| WMH volume (ml) | 7.870 | 7.402 | 7.704 | 13.218 | 13.866 | 13.348 |
| Incidence (i.e. number of participants with IDs in the region) | Volume range (ml) | |||||
| Corpus striatum IDs | 260/358 | 217/316 | 477/674 | 2.768 | 2.670 | (0 – 2.768) |
| Brain stem IDs | 61/358 | 26/316 | 87/674 | 0.748 | 0.554 | (0–0.748) |
| IDs elsewhere | 29/358 | 22/316 | 51/674 | 1.404 | 0.946 | (0–1.404) |
| Brain region | Number of ‘certain’ microbleeds per region in the sample | Frequency of occurrence (1/more than 1 microbleed) in the sample | ||||
| Basal ganglia | 15 | 7 | 22 | 6/2 | 5/1 | 11/3 |
| Brain stem | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2/0 | 0/1 | 2/1 |
| Elsewhere | 55 | 20 | 75 | 16/6 | 8/4 | 24/10 |
IDs, iron deposits; WMHs, white matter hyperintensities. Mean and standard deviation are given for variables normally distributed across the sample. For variables not normally distributed median and interquartile range are given instead. aConsiders only participants who had the parameter (i.e. regional iron deposition) measured.
Figure 4Maximum intensity projections of standard space probability distribution maps in the (from left to right) axial, sagittal and coronal views of WMHs (first row) and IDs (second row) in the sample.
Results of the mediation analysis: path a explores whether variations in the volume of iron deposits (IDs) (corrected for brain size) account for variations in the WMH load, path b explores whether variations in the WMH load account for variations in the cognitive outcomes, path c explores the direct effect of iron deposition on cognition and path ab explores the indirect effect of iron deposition on cognition mediated by WMHs (see Fig. 1)
| Regional and total volumes of iron deposition (independent variable) | Cognitive parameters (dependent variable) | Path a (associations between volumes of IDs and WMHs) ( | Path b (associations between WMHs and cognitive abilities) ( | Path c (direct effect of iron deposition on cognitive abilities) ( | Path ab (indirect effect of iron deposition on cognitive abilities, i.e. mediated by WMHs) ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus striatum | g | 0.091; 0.100 | −0.138; 0.004 | −0.137; 0.006 | −0.012; 0.133 |
| g‐speed | 0.091; 0.100 | −0.181; <0.001 | −0.096; 0.057 | −0.016; 0.110 | |
| g‐memory | 0.090; 0.100 | −0.092; 0.029 | −0.104; 0.033 | −0.008; 0.190 | |
| Brain stem | g | 0.136; 0.006 | −0.141; 0.003 | −0.067; 0.148 | −0.019; 0.028 |
| g‐speed | 0.136; 0.006 | −0.180; <0.001 | −0.068; 0.145 | −0.024; 0.010 | |
| g‐memory | 0.136; 0.006 | −0.090; 0.035 | −0.082; 0.069 | −0.012; 0.085 | |
| Total | g | 0.130; 0.047 | −0.128; 0.008 | −0.166; 0.003 | −0.017; 0.075 |
| g‐speed | 0.130; 0.047 | −0.173; <0.001 | −0.128; 0.030 | −0.022; 0.046 | |
| g‐memory | 0.130; 0.047 | −0.085; 0.044 | −0.127; 0.017 | −0.011; 0.143 |
The sample size for this analysis was n = 597, restricted to individuals with usable cognitive and brain imaging data on white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), brain tissue volume and iron deposition.