Literature DB >> 2709430

Is there evidence for a racial difference in misdiagnosis in patients explored for appendicitis?

R Natesha, S Barnwell, W L Weaver, E L Hoover.   

Abstract

A retrospective review was conducted to determine if there were identifiable racial markers in patients who were explored and misdiagnosed as having appendicitis. Between May 1983 and May 1987, 100 patients were explored for appendicitis. There were 65 whites and 35 blacks with a male predominance in each group. The age range was 4 to 70 years with a mean of 47 years; 30% of each group was in the pediatric age range (less than 17 years old). Eight patients had a normal appendix including two blacks: a 20-year-old male with no pathologic diagnosis and a 42-year-old female with a ruptured cornual pregnancy. Although the sample size was small, there was a trend toward a lower white blood cell count in blacks when appendicitis was confirmed at surgery (11,000 cells/microL +/- 3,000 v 17,000 cells/microL +/- 3,000). The following conclusions can be drawn: (1) the accuracy of diagnosis should be considerably lower than the 20% commonly quoted; (2) the likelihood of an incorrect diagnosis appears to be higher in adults in both groups without a sexual predilection; and (3) there may be a trend toward a higher initial white blood count in whites compared with blacks with acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2709430      PMCID: PMC2571622     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  9 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. A prospective analysis.

Authors:  F Bongard; D V Landers; F Lewis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Death from appendicitis and appendicectomy. An epidemiological survey.

Authors:  J G Howie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Leukocytosis in acute appendicitis. Observed racial difference.

Authors:  P Hyman; D W Westring
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The fate of the negative appendix.

Authors:  F C Chang; H H Hogle; D R Welling
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Acute appendicitis: clinical vs. pathologic diagnosis.

Authors:  E Ferguson; D Pirrung
Journal:  Am J Proctol       Date:  1969-08

6.  Presidential Address: a history of appendicitis. With anecdotes illustrating its importance.

Authors:  G R Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Letter: Error-rate factor in the management of appendicitis.

Authors:  E T Jacob; N Bar-Nathan; M Iuchtman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  An assessment of the value of the menstrual history in differentiating acute appendicitis from pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  J A Robinson; B H Burch
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1984-08

9.  Appendectomy in childhood. Analysis of 105 negative explorations.

Authors:  M J Bell; R J Bower; J L Ternberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.565

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Appendicitis in children: a continuing clinical challenge.

Authors:  R R Marrero; S Barnwell; E L Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.798

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.