Literature DB >> 27094216

Train stimulation of parallel fibre to Purkinje cell inputs reveals two populations of synaptic responses with different receptor signatures.

Suma Priya Sudarsana Devi1, James R Howe1, Céline Auger2.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Purkinje cells of the cerebellum receive ∼180,000 parallel fibre synapses, which have often been viewed as a homogeneous synaptic population and studied using single action potentials. Many parallel fibre synapses might be silent, however, and granule cells in vivo fire in bursts. Here, we used trains of stimuli to study parallel fibre inputs to Purkinje cells in rat cerebellar slices. Analysis of train EPSCs revealed two synaptic components, phase 1 and 2. Phase 1 is initially large and saturates rapidly, whereas phase 2 is initially small and facilitates throughout the train. The two components have a heterogeneous distribution at dendritic sites and different pharmacological profiles. The differential sensitivity of phase 1 and phase 2 to inhibition by pentobarbital and NBQX mirrors the differential sensitivity of AMPA receptors associated with the transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein, γ-2, gating in the low- and high-open probability modes, respectively. ABSTRACT: Cerebellar granule cells fire in bursts, and their parallel fibre axons (PFs) form ∼180,000 excitatory synapses onto the dendritic tree of a Purkinje cell. As many as 85% of these synapses have been proposed to be silent, but most are labelled for AMPA receptors. Here, we studied PF to Purkinje cell synapses using trains of 100 Hz stimulation in rat cerebellar slices. The PF train EPSC consisted of two components that were present in variable proportions at different dendritic sites: one, with large initial EPSC amplitude, saturated after three stimuli and dominated the early phase of the train EPSC; and the other, with small initial amplitude, increased steadily throughout the train of 10 stimuli and dominated the late phase of the train EPSC. The two phases also displayed different pharmacological profiles. Phase 2 was less sensitive to inhibition by NBQX but more sensitive to block by pentobarbital than phase 1. Comparison of synaptic results with fast glutamate applications to recombinant receptors suggests that the high-open-probability gating mode of AMPA receptors containing the auxiliary subunit transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein γ-2 makes a substantial contribution to phase 2. We argue that the two synaptic components arise from AMPA receptors with different functional signatures and synaptic distributions. Comparisons of voltage- and current-clamp responses obtained from the same Purkinje cells indicate that phase 1 of the EPSC arises from synapses ideally suited to transmit short bursts of action potentials, whereas phase 2 is likely to arise from low-release-probability or 'silent' synapses that are recruited during longer bursts.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27094216      PMCID: PMC4929331          DOI: 10.1113/JP272415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  62 in total

1.  Concentration-dependent substate behavior of native AMPA receptors.

Authors:  T C Smith; J R Howe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing.

Authors:  Paul Chadderton; Troy W Margrie; Michael Häusser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Defined criteria for auxiliary subunits of glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Dan Yan; Susumu Tomita
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Two families of TARP isoforms that have distinct effects on the kinetic properties of AMPA receptors and synaptic currents.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Cho; Fannie St-Gelais; Wei Zhang; Susumu Tomita; James R Howe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Sensory representations in cerebellar granule cells.

Authors:  Alexander Arenz; Edward F Bracey; Troy W Margrie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Postsynaptic current mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptors in cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  F Tempia; M C Miniaci; D Anchisi; P Strata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein regulation of competitive antagonism: a problem of interpretation.

Authors:  David M Maclean; Derek Bowie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Auxiliary proteins promote modal gating of AMPA- and kainate-type glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Suma Priya Sudarsana Devi; Susumu Tomita; James R Howe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Stargazin promotes closure of the AMPA receptor ligand-binding domain.

Authors:  David M MacLean; Swarna S Ramaswamy; Mei Du; James R Howe; Vasanthi Jayaraman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Superactivation of AMPA receptors by auxiliary proteins.

Authors:  Anna L Carbone; Andrew J R Plested
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of postsynaptic localization of AMPA-type glutamate receptors and their regulation during long-term potentiation.

Authors:  Olivia R Buonarati; Erik A Hammes; Jake F Watson; Ingo H Greger; Johannes W Hell
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  TARPs Modulate Receptor-Mediated Paired-Pulse Depression and Recovery from Desensitization.

Authors:  Suma Priya Sudarsana Devi; Yiru Cheng; Susumu Tomita; James R Howe; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Control of AMPA receptor activity by the extracellular loops of auxiliary proteins.

Authors:  Irene Riva; Clarissa Eibl; Rudolf Volkmer; Anna L Carbone; Andrew Jr Plested
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Mechanisms underlying TARP modulation of the GluA1/2-γ8 AMPA receptor.

Authors:  Beatriz Herguedas; Bianka K Kohegyi; Jan-Niklas Dohrke; Jake F Watson; Danyang Zhang; Hinze Ho; Saher A Shaikh; Remigijus Lape; James M Krieger; Ingo H Greger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Dual Effects of TARP γ-2 on Glutamate Efficacy Can Account for AMPA Receptor Autoinactivation.

Authors:  Ian D Coombs; David M MacLean; Vasanthi Jayaraman; Mark Farrant; Stuart G Cull-Candy
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Slow AMPA receptors in hippocampal principal cells.

Authors:  Niccolò P Pampaloni; Irene Riva; Anna L Carbone; Andrew J R Plested
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 9.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.