Literature DB >> 27093311

A Computational Model of the Electric Field Distribution due to Regional Personalized or Nonpersonalized Electrodes to Select Transcranial Electric Stimulation Target.

Marta Parazzini, Serena Fiocchi, Andrea Cancelli, Carlo Cottone, Ilaria Liorni, Paolo Ravazzani, Franca Tecchio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A procedure to personalize the electrode to stimulate specific cortical regions by transcranial electric stimulations has been recently proposed. This study aims to assess the distribution of the electric field (E) induced by tES via the personalized (RePE) and the nonpersonalized (ReNPE) electrode.
METHODS: We used two anatomical models on which we shaped and placed the RePE, based on brain anatomy, and the ReNPE to target the bilateral primary motor (M1) or somatosensory cortex (S1) with the reference on the occipital area in both cases. The effect of shifts of the ReNPE position has been also evaluated.
RESULTS: The RePE induced higher E peak and median values than the ReNPE along the bilateral primary motor sensory cortices, up to their lateral regions, on a great percentage of volume of these cortices along all their extent. The shift of the ReNPE electrode toward the inion still induced higher E peak and median values than the ReNPE not shifted, but less than the RePE, mainly in the central region and, in a lower percentage of volume, in the lateral regions of these cortices.
CONCLUSION: The E distributions induced for both targets (M1 and S1) by the RePE are different from the ones due to the ReNPE, along the whole extent of the bilateral primary sensorimotor cortices. The shift in the ReNPE positioning can modify the E distributions mainly in the more central region of these cortices. SIGNIFICANCE: These results strengthen the suitability of personalized electrodes in targeting extended cortical regions.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27093311     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2553177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  5 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Capacitive technologies for highly controlled and personalized electrical stimulation by implantable biomedical systems.

Authors:  Marco P Soares Dos Santos; J Coutinho; Ana Marote; Bárbara Sousa; A Ramos; Jorge A F Ferreira; Rodrigo Bernardo; André Rodrigues; A Torres Marques; Odete A B da Cruz E Silva; Edward P Furlani; José A O Simões; Sandra I Vieira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  MRI-Guided Regional Personalized Electrical Stimulation in Multisession and Home Treatments.

Authors:  Andrea Cancelli; Carlo Cottone; Alessandro Giordani; Giampiero Asta; Domenico Lupoi; Vittorio Pizzella; Franca Tecchio
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Cortical neurodynamics changes mediate the efficacy of a personalized neuromodulation against multiple sclerosis fatigue.

Authors:  Camillo Porcaro; Carlo Cottone; Andrea Cancelli; Paolo M Rossini; Giancarlo Zito; Franca Tecchio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Directionality of the injected current targeting the P20/N20 source determines the efficacy of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-induced aftereffects in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mohd Faizal Mohd Zulkifly; Albert Lehr; Daniel van de Velden; Asad Khan; Niels K Focke; Carsten H Wolters; Walter Paulus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.