Literature DB >> 2709316

Effects of sinker shapes on dissolution profiles.

R A Soltero1, J M Hoover, T F Jones, M Standish.   

Abstract

In dissolution testing, according to the U.S. Pharmacopeia, a nonreactive stainless steel wire helix is typically used to sink dosage forms that would otherwise float. The objective of this investigation was to determine if other sinker shapes will influence the rate, extent, or variability of dissolution. Criteria for the optimal sinker were defined. Various new sinker designs were fabricated, tested, and classified. Four classes of sinker shapes were defined: longitudinal, lateral, screen enclosures, and internal weights. Longitudinal sinkers contact the dosage forms on the long axis. Lateral sinkers either wrap around or contact capsule dosage forms in the middle, such as the line where the top and bottom halves of a capsule shell come together. Screen enclosures are of two types: either a wire cage, which holds the entire capsule, or a circular piece of wire screen placed on top of the capsule. Internal weights consist of two steel ball bearings, one inserted into each end of the capsule. The investigation consisted of four studies: (1) visual observation of the dissolution performance using 12 different sinkers; (2) the effect on drug release from nine classified sinkers on two different capsule formulations; (3) side-by-side comparison between the selected optimal longitudinal U clip and the wire helix lateral type sinkers; and (4) hydrodynamic effects caused by the use of the longitudinal U clip and the wire helix lateral type sinkers in the absence of capsule shells. We concluded that capsules sunk with either of the two longitudinal sinkers, the U clip or the paper clip, have faster, more complete dissolution and less variable results than did lateral type sinkers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2709316     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600780110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  4 in total

Review 1.  The science of USP 1 and 2 dissolution: present challenges and future relevance.

Authors:  Vivian Gray; Gregg Kelly; Min Xia; Chris Butler; Saji Thomas; Stephen Mayock
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Perspectives of in vitro dissolution tests in establishing in vivo/in vitro correlations.

Authors:  M Siewert
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate in dissolution media on dissolution of hard gelatin capsule shells.

Authors:  Fang Zhao; Vyacheslav Malayev; Venkatramana Rao; Munir Hussain
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Challenges of Dissolution Methods Development for Soft Gelatin Capsules.

Authors:  Festo Damian; Mohammad Harati; Jeff Schwartzenhauer; Owen Van Cauwenberghe; Shawn D Wettig
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.