Literature DB >> 27092914

The Effect of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on the Clinical Performance of Extra-Short Locking-Taper Implants.

Francesco Mangano1, Irene Frezzato, Alberto Frezzato, Giovanni Veronesi, Carmen Mortellaro, Carlo Mangano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present prospective 5-year study was to evaluate the influence of crown-to-implant ratio (C/I ratio) on the survival, peri-implant marginal bone loss, and complications of extra-short (6.5 mm) locking-taper implants placed in the posterior areas of the jaw.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, all patients presenting with partial edentulism associated with vertical defects of the posterior alveolar ridges and sufficient bone volume to place extra-short (6.5 mm length × 5 mm diameter) implants were considered for inclusion in this study.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (22 men, 29 women; aged between 40 and 75 years) were included in this study. Sixty-eight extra-short, locking-taper implants were placed to support 49 single crowns and 9 fixed partial dentures. The C/I ratio was <2 for 51 implants and ≥2 for 17 implants. All patients underwent the 5-year clinical examination. Two implants failed. Failure proportion was 2% in the C/I<2 group, and 6% in the C/I≥2 group: this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.4). After 1 year of loading, a mean marginal bone loss of 0.29 and 0.39 was reported in the C/I<2 group and the C/I≥2 group, respectively. After 5 years of loading, a mean marginal bone loss of 0.38 and 0.48 was reported in the C/I<2 and C/I≥2 groups, respectively. The linear regression model failed to find a correlation between the C/I ratio and marginal bone loss along time, with a 0.023 mm (95% CI: -0.002; 0.048) increase in 1-year bone resorption for every 0.1 increase in C/I ratio (P = 0.07). At 5-year, the association reduced to 0.019 mm (P = 0.18). Only a few complications were reported. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of biological (P = 0.9) complications between the 2 groups. Prosthetic complications were more frequent with C/I≥2 (12.5%) than with C/I<2 (6%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Extra-short, locking-taper implants may be successfully used in the posterior areas of the jaw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27092914     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Raquel Zita Gomes; Andres Paraud Freixas; Chang-Hun Han; Sohueil Bechara; Isaac Tawil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Dental Implants Placed in Patients with Mechanical Risk Factors: A Long-term Follow-up Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Piero Papi; Stefano Di Carlo; Francesca Mencio; Daniele Rosella; Francesca De Angelis; Giorgio Pompa
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-06-20

3.  Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Jacopo Pighi; Mauro Marincola; Giovanni Corrocher; Miguel Simancas-Pallares; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-07-02

4.  Morse Taper Connection Implants Placed in Grafted Sinuses in 65 Patients: A Retrospective Clinical Study with 10 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Renata Bakaj; Irene Frezzato; Alberto Frezzato; Sergio Montini; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-08-07

5.  A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE®) for the Design and Fabrication of Implant-Supported Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Cemented on Customized Hybrid Abutments: A Retrospective Clinical Study on 25 Patients.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Bidzina Margiani; Oleg Admakin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Yan; Xinyu Wu; Meiying Su; Fang Hua; Bin Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Stefano Sivolella; Silvia Meggiorin; Nadia Ferrarese; Amalia Lupi; Antonino Fiorino; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.