Simona Ben-Haim1, Jenny Garkaby, Natalia Primashvili, Elinor Goshen, Ronnie Shapira, Tima Davidson, Ora Israel, Ron Epelbaum. 1. Departments of aNuclear Medicine bOncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer cSourasky Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv Departments of dNuclear Medicine eOncology, Rambam Healthcare Campus fThe Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel gInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London and UCL Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare aggressive skin tumor associated with a high mortality rate. The present study evaluated the role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in subsequent management of patients with MCC. METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive F-FDG PET/CT studies of 46 patients with MCC (28 men, 68±15.4 years) were retrospectively evaluated and the role in clinical care was documented. RESULTS: There were 40 positive studies (40%) in 28 patients (61%); of these, 33 studies (33%) in 27 patients (59%) showed metastatic disease. Fifty-two PET/CT studies (51%) in 23/46 (50%) patients were negative. Fifty-three studies (52%) were performed for staging or restaging in 41 patients, 29 scans (29%) were performed for routine follow-up in 10 patients, nine studies were carried out for suspected recurrent disease in eight patients, and 10 studies were carried out for assessment of response to therapy in seven patients. On the basis of PET/CT results, there was a change in disease stage in 12 studies in 12 patients (26%) and further change in the management of seven patients (15%). Overall, 2/29 routine follow-up studies were positive with further impact on management in one patient. CONCLUSION: F-FDG PET-CT altered the stage of one of four patients and changed the management of one of seven MCC patients. In the majority of patients, a negative F-FDG PET-CT study excluded active MCC with a high degree of confidence. PET-CT contributed toward patient management when performed for staging and restaging, monitoring response to treatment, and suspected recurrent disease, but not in the routine follow-up of asymptomatic patients with MCC.
OBJECTIVES:Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare aggressive skin tumor associated with a high mortality rate. The present study evaluated the role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in subsequent management of patients with MCC. METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive F-FDG PET/CT studies of 46 patients with MCC (28 men, 68±15.4 years) were retrospectively evaluated and the role in clinical care was documented. RESULTS: There were 40 positive studies (40%) in 28 patients (61%); of these, 33 studies (33%) in 27 patients (59%) showed metastatic disease. Fifty-two PET/CT studies (51%) in 23/46 (50%) patients were negative. Fifty-three studies (52%) were performed for staging or restaging in 41 patients, 29 scans (29%) were performed for routine follow-up in 10 patients, nine studies were carried out for suspected recurrent disease in eight patients, and 10 studies were carried out for assessment of response to therapy in seven patients. On the basis of PET/CT results, there was a change in disease stage in 12 studies in 12 patients (26%) and further change in the management of seven patients (15%). Overall, 2/29 routine follow-up studies were positive with further impact on management in one patient. CONCLUSION:F-FDG PET-CT altered the stage of one of four patients and changed the management of one of seven MCC patients. In the majority of patients, a negative F-FDG PET-CT study excluded active MCC with a high degree of confidence. PET-CT contributed toward patient management when performed for staging and restaging, monitoring response to treatment, and suspected recurrent disease, but not in the routine follow-up of asymptomatic patients with MCC.
Authors: Sonia Mahajan; Christopher A Barker; Audrey Mauguen; Sandra P D'Angelo; Randy Yeh; Neeta Pandit-Taskar Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Sumaira Z Aasi; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Rachel Blitzblau; Glen M Bowen; Carlo M Contreras; Gregory A Daniels; Roy Decker; Jeffrey M Farma; Kris Fisher; Brian Gastman; Karthik Ghosh; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Manisha Loss; Daniel D Lydiatt; Jane Messina; Kishwer S Nehal; Paul Nghiem; Igor Puzanov; Chrysalyne D Schmults; Ashok R Shaha; Valencia Thomas; Yaohui G Xu; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Anita M Engh Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 12.693
Authors: Alison M Weppler; Andrew Pattison; Richard W Tothill; Shahneen Sandhu; Prachi Bhave; Paolo De Ieso; Jeanette Raleigh; Athena Hatzimihalis; Anthony J Gill; Shiva Balachander; Jason Callahan; Margaret Chua; George Au-Yeung; Grant A McArthur; Rodney J Hicks Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 13.751