Literature DB >> 27092025

Mental Health Research in Correctional Settings: Perceptions of Risk and Vulnerabilities.

Mark E Johnson1, Karli K Kondo2, Christiane Brems3, Erica F Ironside3, Gloria D Eldridge4.   

Abstract

With over half of individuals incarcerated having serious mental health concerns, correctional settings offer excellent opportunities for epidemiological, prevention, and intervention research. However, due to unique ethical and structural challenges, these settings create risks and vulnerabilities for participants not typically encountered in research populations. We surveyed 1,224 researchers, IRB members, and IRB prisoner representatives to assess their perceptions of risks associated with mental health research conducted in correctional settings. Highest-ranked risks were related to privacy, stigma, and confidentiality; lowest-ranked risks were related to prisoners' loss of privileges or becoming targets of violence due to having participated in research. Cognitive impairment, mental illness, lack of autonomy, and limited access to services emerged as the greatest sources of vulnerability; being male, being female, being over age of 60, being a minority, and being pregnant were the lowest-ranked sources of vulnerability. Researchers with corrections experience perceived lower risks and vulnerabilities than all other groups, raising the question whether these researchers accurately appraise risk and vulnerability based on experience, or if their lower risk and vulnerability perceptions reflect potential bias due to their vested interests. By identifying areas of particular risk and vulnerability, this study provides important information for researchers and research reviewers alike.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correctional Settings; Perceptions; Prisoners; Risk; Vulnerability

Year:  2015        PMID: 27092025      PMCID: PMC4833090          DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1011327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  14 in total

1.  A framework for considering the ethical aspects of psychiatric research protocols.

Authors:  L W Roberts; C M Geppert; J L Brody
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 2.  The health of prisoners.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; Jacques Baillargeon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Physical victimization in prison: the role of mental illness.

Authors:  Cynthia L Blitz; Nancy Wolff; Jing Shi
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09-21

4.  The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Reflections on a Presidential Commission.

Authors:  R Faden
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Do investigators understand ethically-important perspectives of clinical research participants?: a 'piggy-back' study of attunement and alignment in serious illness research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 6.  The ethical basis of psychiatric research: conceptual issues and empirical findings.

Authors:  L W Roberts
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.735

7.  Ethical principles and practices for research involving human participants with mental illness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Research protections for diverted mentally ill individuals: should they be considered prisoners?

Authors:  W Amory Carr; Charles Amrhein; Ryna Dery
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2011-10-20

9.  Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment.

Authors:  L B Dunn; D V Jeste
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  An Empirical Ethics Agenda for Psychiatric Research Involving Prisoners.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Philip J Candilis; Josiah D Rich; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.