Literature DB >> 27091900

Selective Heart Rate Reduction With Ivabradine Increases Central Blood Pressure in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Stefano F Rimoldi1, Franz H Messerli1, David Cerny2, Steffen Gloekler2, Tobias Traupe2, Stéphane Laurent2, Christian Seiler2.   

Abstract

Heart rate (HR) lowering by β-blockade was shown to be beneficial after myocardial infarction. In contrast, HR lowering with ivabradine was found to confer no benefits in 2 prospective randomized trials in patients with coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that this inefficacy could be in part related to ivabradine's effect on central (aortic) pressure. Our study included 46 patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease who were randomly allocated to placebo (n=23) or ivabradine (n=23) in a single-blinded fashion for 6 months. Concomitant baseline medication was continued unchanged throughout the study except for β-blockers, which were stopped during the study period. Central blood pressure and stroke volume were measured directly by left heart catheterization at baseline and after 6 months. For the determination of resting HR at baseline and at follow-up, 24-hour ECG monitoring was performed. Patients on ivabradine showed an increase of 11 mm Hg in central systolic pressure from 129±22 mm Hg to 140±26 mm Hg (P=0.02) and in stroke volume by 86±21.8 to 107.2±30.0 mL (P=0.002). In the placebo group, central systolic pressure and stroke volume remained unchanged. Estimates of myocardial oxygen consumption (HR×systolic pressure and time-tension index) remained unchanged with ivabradine.The decrease in HR from baseline to follow-up correlated with the concomitant increase in central systolic pressure (r=-0.41, P=0.009) and in stroke volume (r=-0.61, P<0.001). In conclusion, the decrease in HR with ivabradine was associated with an increase in central systolic pressure, which may have antagonized possible benefits of HR lowering in coronary artery disease patients. CLINICAL TRIALSURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01039389.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central blood pressure; coronary artery disease; heart rate; ivabradine; stroke volume; ventricular-vascular mismatch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27091900     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current Pharmacological Therapies in Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Anna Paini; Claudia Agabiti Rosei; Fabio Bertacchini; Deborah Stassaldi; Massimo Salvetti
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-03-27

Review 2.  Pharmacological heart rate lowering in patients with a preserved ejection fraction-review of a failing concept.

Authors:  Markus Meyer; Mehdi Rambod; Martin LeWinter
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Two cases of dilated cardiomyopathy with blood pressure-limited tolerability of cardioprotective agents improved by ivabradine.

Authors:  Takahiro Okumura; Hiroaki Hiraiwa; Takashi Araki; Takashi Mizutani; Yuki Kimura; Shingo Kazama; Naoki Shibata; Hideo Oishi; Tasuku Kuwayama; Toru Kondo; Ryota Morimoto; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2020-11-23

4.  Effects of Ivabradine on Patients with Depressed Left Ventricular Function after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Chang; Hsin-Ti Huang; Chi-Yen Wang; Hsu-Chung Lo; Hsiao-Jen Chen; An-Ning Feng; Man-Cai Fong; Chi-Nan Chen; Hung-Chuan Chang; Kuo-Feng Chiang; Jin-Long Huang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Kazuomi Kario; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Satoshi Hoshide; Huynh Van Minh; Jennifer Nailes; Sungha Park; Jinho Shin; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Apichard Sukonthasarn; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Narsingh Verma; Yuqing Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Ivabradine in Cardiovascular Disease Management Revisited: a Review.

Authors:  Christopher Chen; Gurleen Kaur; Puja K Mehta; Doralisa Morrone; Lucas C Godoy; Sripal Bangalore; Mandeep S Sidhu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Modeling Arterial Pulse Pressure From Heart Rate During Sympathetic Activation by Progressive Central Hypovolemia.

Authors:  Björn J P van Der Ster; Nicolaas H Sperna Weiland; Berend E Westerhof; Wim J Stok; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Acute Tachycardia Increases Aortic Distensibility, but Reduces Total Arterial Compliance Up to a Moderate Heart Rate.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Huan Chen; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Combination of ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Ying-Hsiang Lee; Po-Lin Lin; Wei-Ru Chiou; Jin-Long Huang; Wen-Yu Lin; Chia-Te Liao; Fa-Po Chung; Huai-Wen Liang; Chien-Yi Hsu; Hung-Yu Chang
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-01-06

10.  Atenolol's Inferior Ability to Reduce Central vs Peripheral Blood Pressure Can Be Explained by the Combination of Its Heart Rate-Dependent and Heart Rate-Independent Effects.

Authors:  Tuuli Teeäär; Martin Serg; Kaido Paapstel; Mare Vähi; Jaak Kals; John R Cockcroft; Mihkel Zilmer; Jaan Eha; Priit Kampus
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.420

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.