Literature DB >> 27091445

The Impact of New Payment Models on Quality of Diabetes Care and Outcomes.

Erin L McGinley1, Robert A Gabbay2.   

Abstract

Historic changes in healthcare reimbursement and payment models due to the Affordable Care Act in the United States have the potential to transform how providers care for chronic diseases such as diabetes. Payment experimentation has provided insights into how changing incentives for primary care providers can yield improvements in the triple aim: improving patient experience, improving the health of populations, and reducing costs of healthcare. Much of this has involved leveraging widespread adoption of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) with diabetes often the focus. While evidence is mounting that the PCMH can improve diabetes outcomes, some PCMH demonstrations have displayed mixed results. One of the first large-scale PCMH demonstrations developed around diabetes was conducted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Different payment models were employed across a series of staggered regional rollouts that provided a case study for the influence of innovative payment models. These learning laboratories provide insights into the role of reimbursement models and changes in how practice transformation is implemented. Ultimately, evolving payment systems focused on the total cost of care, such as Accountable Care Organizations, hold promise to transform diabetes care and produce significant cost savings through the prevention of complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Healthcare delivery; Payment models; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27091445     DOI: 10.1007/s11892-016-0743-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diab Rep        ISSN: 1534-4827            Impact factor:   4.810


  9 in total

1.  The Patient-Centered Medical Neighborhood and Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Christin Spatz; Robert Gabbay
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2014-05

2.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Launching accountable care organizations--the proposed rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Multipayer patient-centered medical home implementation guided by the chronic care model.

Authors:  Robert A Gabbay; Michael H Bailit; David T Mauger; Edward H Wagner; Linda Siminerio
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2011-06

5.  Cost of Transformation among Primary Care Practices Participating in a Medical Home Pilot.

Authors:  Grant R Martsolf; Ryan Kandrack; Robert A Gabbay; Mark W Friedberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Medical homes and cost and utilization among high-risk patients.

Authors:  Susannah Higgins; Ravi Chawla; Christine Colombo; Richard Snyder; Somesh Nigam
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence.

Authors:  James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; Lawrence E Barker; David F Williamson
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-10-22

8.  Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Eric C Schneider; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kevin G Volpp; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Innovative Solutions to Care for Individuals With Diabetes in Underserved Populations.

Authors:  Athena Philis-Tsimikas
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2019-11

Review 2.  How can clinical practices pragmatically increase physical activity for patients with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kelsey A Luoma; Ian M Leavitt; Joel C Marrs; Andrea L Nederveld; Judith G Regensteiner; Andrea L Dunn; Russell E Glasgow; Amy G Huebschmann
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Clinical Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Anders L Carlson; Deborah M Mullen; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Insurance Status and Biological and Psychosocial Determinants of Cardiometabolic Risk Among Mexican-Origin U.S. Hispanic/Latino Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Namino M Glantz; Jessikah M Morales; Wendy C Bevier; Arianna Larez; Charis B Hoppe; Ian Duncan; Andrew Mackenzie; David Kerr
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 5.  Practical Strategies for Assessing Patient Physical Activity Levels in Primary Care.

Authors:  Mark Stoutenberg; Gabriel E Shaya; David I Feldman; Jennifer K Carroll
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.