Literature DB >> 27090986

Nonnucleoside Reverse-transcriptase Inhibitor- vs Ritonavir-boosted Protease Inhibitor-based Regimens for Initial Treatment of HIV Infection: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Randomized Trials.

Álvaro H Borges1, Andreas Lundh2, Britta Tendal3, John A Bartlett4, Nathan Clumeck5, Dominique Costagliola6, Eric S Daar7, Patrícia Echeverría8, Magnus Gisslén9, Tania B Huedo-Medina10, Michael D Hughes11, Katherine Huppler Hullsiek12, Paul Khabo13, Stephanus Komati13, Princy Kumar14, Shahin Lockman15, Rodger D MacArthur16, Franco Maggiolo17, Alberto Matteelli18, Jose M Miro19, Shinichi Oka20, Kathy Petoumenos21, Rebekah L Puls21, Sharon A Riddler22, Paul E Sax23, Juan Sierra-Madero24, Carlo Torti25, Jens D Lundgren1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) cause faster virologic suppression, while ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) recover more CD4 cells. However, individual trials have not been powered to compare clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We searched databases to identify randomized trials that compared NNRTI- vs PI/r-based initial therapy. A metaanalysis calculated risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs), as appropriate. Primary outcome was death or progression to AIDS. Secondary outcomes were death, progression to AIDS, and treatment discontinuation. We calculated RR of virologic suppression and MD for an increase in CD4 cells at week 48.
RESULTS: We included 29 trials with 9047 participants. Death or progression to AIDS occurred in 226 participants in the NNRTI arm and in 221 in the PI/r arm (RR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, .87-1.22; 12 trials; n = 3825), death in 205 participants in the NNRTI arm vs 198 in the PI/r arm (1.04; 0.86-1.25; 22 trials; n = 8311), and progression to AIDS in 140 participants in the NNRTI arm vs 144 in the PI/r arm (1.00; 0.80-1.25; 13 trials; n = 4740). Overall treatment discontinuation (1.12; 0.93-1.35; 24 trials; n = 8249) and from toxicity (1.21; 0.87-1.68; 21 trials; n = 6195) were comparable, but discontinuation due to virologic failure was more common with NNRTI (1.58; 0.91-2.74; 17 trials; n = 5371). At week 48, there was no difference between NNRTI and PI/r in virologic suppression (RR, 1.03; 0.98-1.09) or CD4(+) recovery (MD, -4.7 cells; -14.2 to 4.8).
CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in clinical and viro-immunologic outcomes between NNRTI- and PI/r-based therapy.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; antiretroviral therapy; metaanalysis; nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; protease inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27090986      PMCID: PMC6276924          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  33 in total

1.  Initial viral decay to assess the relative antiretroviral potency of protease inhibitor-sparing, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing, and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimens for first-line therapy of HIV infection.

Authors:  Richard H Haubrich; Sharon A Riddler; Heather Ribaudo; Gregory Direnzo; Karin L Klingman; Kevin W Garren; David L Butcher; James F Rooney; Diane V Havlir; John W Mellors
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 2.  Stavudine or zidovudine in three-drug combination therapy for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral-naïve individuals.

Authors:  Alicen Spaulding; George W Rutherford; Nandi Siegfried
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

3.  Antiretroviral therapies in women after single-dose nevirapine exposure.

Authors:  Shahin Lockman; Michael D Hughes; James McIntyre; Yu Zheng; Tsungai Chipato; Francesca Conradie; Fred Sawe; Aida Asmelash; Mina C Hosseinipour; Lerato Mohapi; Elizabeth Stringer; Rosie Mngqibisa; Abraham Siika; Diana Atwine; James Hakim; Douglas Shaffer; Cecilia Kanyama; Kara Wools-Kaloustian; Robert A Salata; Evelyn Hogg; Beverly Alston-Smith; Ann Walawander; Eva Purcelle-Smith; Susan Eshleman; James Rooney; Sibtain Rahim; John W Mellors; Robert T Schooley; Judith S Currier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine for initial HIV-1 therapy.

Authors:  Paul E Sax; Camlin Tierney; Ann C Collier; Margaret A Fischl; Katie Mollan; Lynne Peeples; Catherine Godfrey; Nasreen C Jahed; Laurie Myers; David Katzenstein; Awny Farajallah; James F Rooney; Belinda Ha; William C Woodward; Susan L Koletar; Victoria A Johnson; P Jan Geiseler; Eric S Daar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients infected with HIV-1. EuroSIDA Study Group.

Authors:  A Mocroft; S Vella; T L Benfield; A Chiesi; V Miller; P Gargalianos; A d'Arminio Monforte; I Yust; J N Bruun; A N Phillips; J D Lundgren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Clinical efficacy of antiretroviral combination therapy based on protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: indirect comparison of controlled trials.

Authors:  Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Daouda Sissoko; Matthias Egger; Yves Mouton; Marcel Zwahlen; Geneviève Chêne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23

7.  Efficacy and tolerability of 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naive volunteers infected with HIV-1: a randomized, controlled equivalence trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Lennox; Raphael J Landovitz; Heather J Ribaudo; Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Lumine H Na; Catherine Godfrey; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Manish Sagar; Todd T Brown; Susan E Cohn; Grace A McComsey; Francesca Aweeka; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Rachel M Presti; Susan L Koletar; David W Haas; Kristine B Patterson; Constance A Benson; Bryan P Baugh; Randi Y Leavitt; James F Rooney; Daniel Seekins; Judith S Currier
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Nevirapine- versus lopinavir/ritonavir-based initial therapy for HIV-1 infection among women in Africa: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Shahin Lockman; Michael Hughes; Fred Sawe; Yu Zheng; James McIntyre; Tsungai Chipato; Aida Asmelash; Mohammed Rassool; Sylvester Kimaiyo; Douglas Shaffer; Mina Hosseinipour; Lerato Mohapi; Francis Ssali; Margret Chibowa; Farida Amod; Elias Halvas; Evelyn Hogg; Beverly Alston-Smith; Laura Smith; Robert Schooley; John Mellors; Judith Currier
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  First-line antiretroviral therapy with nevirapine versus lopinavir-ritonavir based regimens in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  Nathan Clumeck; Claude Mwamba; Kabamba Kabeya; Serge Matanda; Dolorès Vaira; Coca Necsoi; David Kadiebwe; Marc Delforge; Eric Kasamba; Chantal Milolo; Joe Ilunga; Liévin Kapend
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 10.  Efficacy of initial antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 114 studies with up to 144 weeks' follow-up.

Authors:  Frederick J Lee; Janaki Amin; Andrew Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of Protease Inhibitors on HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma Incidence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elaine Chang; Srikar R Mapakshi; Pamela Mbang; Nader Kim El-Mallawany; Jennifer R Kramer; Donna L White; Elizabeth Y Chiao
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.771

2.  The choice between a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor- and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen for initiation of antiretroviral treatment - results from an observational study in Germany.

Authors:  Jörg Mahlich; Mona Groß; Alexander Kuhlmann; Johannes Bogner; Hans Heiken; Matthias Stoll
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2016-12-30

3.  Durability of Efavirenz Compared With Boosted Protease Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Antiretroviral-Naïve Patients in the Caribbean and Central and South America.

Authors:  Yanink Caro-Vega; Pablo F Belaunzarán-Zamudio; Brenda E Crabtree-Ramírez; Bryan E Shepherd; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Marcelo Wolff; Jean W Pape; Denis Padgett; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Catherine C McGowan; Juan G Sierra-Madero
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  A week-48 randomized phase-3 trial of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive HIV-1 patients.

Authors:  Joseph J Eron; Chloe Orkin; Joel Gallant; Jean-Michel Molina; Eugenia Negredo; Andrea Antinori; Anthony Mills; Jacques Reynes; Erika Van Landuyt; Erkki Lathouwers; Veerle Hufkens; John Jezorwski; Simon Vanveggel; Magda Opsomer
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  On restricted optimal treatment regime estimation for competing risks data.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Jiajia Zhang; Wenbin Lu; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.