Literature DB >> 2709087

Telling the diagnosis of cancer.

S E Lind1, M J DelVecchio Good, S Seidel, T Csordas, B J Good.   

Abstract

Although a concensus has emerged in this country that patients should be told when cancer is discovered, no data is available to indicate how and where patients are currently told that they have cancer. Fifty-five patients undergoing anticancer therapy were therefore interviewed to learn how this process occurs. The majority of patients were told by surgeons (74%) and only a minority by primary care physicians (11%). Most were told in a traditional medical setting (42% in the doctor's office, 17% in a hospital room), but 23% were told over the telephone and 19% in the recovery room. Two indicators of patient satisfaction with the telling process suggested that different sites of telling were not equivalent. Patients told over the telephone or in the recovery room were more likely to describe the telling in negative terms and less likely to describe their doctors as being helpful in understanding their illness than those told in a doctor's office or in their hospital bed. This pilot study indicates considerable variation in this aspect of patient care and suggests directions for future research. To determine whether interviews that explore these issues with cancer patients are unpleasant or stressful, patients' reactions to being subjects in this study were sought. Patients asked directly at the completion of the interview or surveyed 2 to 4 months later said the interview had been helpful and/or a positive experience. None expressed negative feelings about participating. Concerns about the psychological harm resulting from such study of this patient group do not appear to be warranted and should not impede future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2709087     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  19 in total

1.  Communicating bad news.

Authors:  J Miranda; R V Brody
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-01

2.  The Heart of the Meaning: Honoring the Work of Byron J. Good.

Authors:  Atwood D Gaines
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12

3.  American oncology and the discourse on hope.

Authors:  M J Delvecchio Good; B J Good; C Schaffer; S E Lind
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1990-03

4.  The right to information for the terminally ill patient.

Authors:  E Osuna; M D Pérez-Cárceles; M A Esteban; A Luna
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Primary care physicians' attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carma L Bylund; Elisa S Weiss; Margo Michaels; Shilpa Patel; Thomas A D'Agostino; Emily B Peterson; Maria Christina Binz-Scharf; Natasha Blakeney; M Diane McKee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Preventing communication errors in telephone medicine.

Authors:  Anna B Reisman; Karen E Brown
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Disclosing a diagnosis of cancer: where and how does it occur?

Authors:  William D Figg; Erika K Smith; Douglas K Price; Bevin C English; Paul W Thurman; Seth M Steinberg; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  [Breaking bad news--a challenge for every physician].

Authors:  G Schilling; A Mehnert
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Patients' preferences for learning the results of mammographic examinations.

Authors:  S E Lind; D Kopans; M J Good
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  When clinicians telling the truth is de facto discouraged, what is the family's attitude towards disclosing to a relative their cancer diagnosis?

Authors:  Dian-can Wang; Xin Peng; Chuan-bin Guo; Yan-jie Su
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.