Literature DB >> 27090588

Protein resistance efficacy of PEO-silane amphiphiles: Dependence on PEO-segment length and concentration.

Marc A Rufin1, Mikayla E Barry1, Paige A Adair1, Melissa L Hawkins1, Jeffery E Raymond2, Melissa A Grunlan3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In contrast to modification with conventional PEO-silanes (i.e. no siloxane tether), silicones with dramatically enhanced protein resistance have been previously achieved via bulk-modification with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-silane amphiphiles α-(EtO)3Si(CH2)2-oligodimethylsiloxane13-block-PEOn-OCH3 when n=8 and 16 but not when n=3. In this work, their efficacy was evaluated in terms of optimal PEO-segment length and minimum concentration required in silicone. For each PEO-silane amphiphile (n=3, 8, and 16), five concentrations (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100μmol per 1g silicone) were evaluated. Efficacy was quantified in terms of the modified silicones' abilities to undergo rapid, water-driven surface restructuring to form hydrophilic surfaces as well as resistance to fibrinogen adsorption. Only n=8 and 16 were effective, with a lower minimum concentration in silicone required for n=8 (10μmol per 1g silicone) versus n=16 (25μmol per 1g silicone). STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Silicone is commonly used for implantable medical devices, but its hydrophobic surface promotes protein adsorption which leads to thrombosis and infection. Typical methods to incorporate poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) into silicones have not been effective due to the poor migration of PEO to the surface-biological interface. In this work, PEO-silane amphiphiles - comprised of a siloxane tether (m=13) and variable PEO segment lengths (n=3, 8, 16) - were blended into silicone to improve its protein resistance. The efficacy of the amphiphiles was determined to be dependent on PEO length. With the intermediate PEO length (n=8), water-driven surface restructuring and resulting protein resistance was achieved with a concentration of only 1.7wt%.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poly(ethylene oxide); Protein-resistant; Silicone; Surface restructuring; Surface-modifying additive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27090588      PMCID: PMC5106186          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  32 in total

1.  Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy.

Authors:  Soon J Park; Carmelo A Milano; Antone J Tatooles; Joseph G Rogers; Robert M Adamson; D Eric Steidley; Gregory A Ewald; Kartik S Sundareswaran; David J Farrar; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Protein adsorption on surfaces with grafted polymers: a theoretical approach.

Authors:  I Szleifer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Hydrophilicity of polymers and soft tissue responses: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J A Hunt; G Meijs; D F Williams
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-09-15

Review 4.  Silica, silicon and silicones ... unraveling the mystery.

Authors:  T H Lane; S A Burns
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  In vitro and in vivo studies of PEO-grafted blood-contacting cardiovascular prostheses.

Authors:  K Park; H S Shim; M K Dewanjee; N L Eigler
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.517

6.  Protein repellant silicone surfaces by covalent immobilization of poly(ethylene oxide).

Authors:  Hong Chen; Zheng Zhang; Yang Chen; Michael A Brook; Heather Sheardown
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Poly(ethylene oxide) Grafted to Silicon Surfaces: Grafting Density and Protein Adsorption.

Authors: 
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 5.985

8.  Enhancing the protein resistance of silicone via surface-restructuring PEO-silane amphiphiles with variable PEO length.

Authors:  M A Rufin; J A Gruetzner; M J Hurley; M L Hawkins; E S Raymond; J E Raymond; M A Grunlan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  Proteins and cells on PEG immobilized silicon surfaces.

Authors:  M Zhang; T Desai; M Ferrari
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Protein-resistant silicones: incorporation of poly(ethylene oxide) via siloxane tethers.

Authors:  Ranjini Murthy; Casey D Cox; Mariah S Hahn; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.988

View more
  2 in total

1.  Antifouling silicones based on surface-modifying additive amphiphiles.

Authors:  Marc A Rufin; Bryan Khai D Ngo; Mikayla E Barry; Vanessa M Page; Melissa L Hawkins; Shane J Stafslien; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Green Mater       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.081

2.  Surface Chemical Functionalization of Wrinkled Thiol-ene Elastomers for Promoting Cellular Alignment.

Authors:  Stephen J Ma; Eden M Ford; Lisa A Sawicki; Bryan P Sutherland; Nicole I Halaszynski; Benjamin J Carberry; Norman J Wagner; April M Kloxin; Christopher J Kloxin
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-05-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.