β-Sheet forming peptides have attracted significant interest for the design of hydrogels for biomedical applications. One of the main challenges is the control and understanding of the correlations between peptide molecular structure, the morphology, and topology of the fiber and network formed as well as the macroscopic properties of the hydrogel obtained. In this work, we have investigated the effect that functionalizing these peptides through their hydrophobic face has on their self-assembly and gelation. Our results show that the modification of the hydrophobic face results in a partial loss of the extended β-sheet conformation of the peptide and a significant change in fiber morphology from straight to kinked. As a consequence, the ability of these fibers to associate along their length and form large bundles is reduced. These structural changes (fiber structure and network topology) significantly affect the mechanical properties of the hydrogels (shear modulus and elasticity).
β-Sheet forming peptides have attracted significant interest for the design of hydrogels for biomedical applications. One of the main challenges is the control and understanding of the correlations between peptide molecular structure, the morphology, and topology of the fiber and network formed as well as the macroscopic properties of the hydrogel obtained. In this work, we have investigated the effect that functionalizing these peptides through their hydrophobic face has on their self-assembly and gelation. Our results show that the modification of the hydrophobic face results in a partial loss of the extended β-sheet conformation of the peptide and a significant change in fiber morphology from straight to kinked. As a consequence, the ability of these fibers to associate along their length and form large bundles is reduced. These structural changes (fiber structure and network topology) significantly affect the mechanical properties of the hydrogels (shear modulus and elasticity).
The use of noncovalent molecular self-assembly
to construct materials
has become a prominent strategy offering practical routes for the
construction of increasingly functional materials. A variety of molecular
building blocks can be used for this purpose; one such block that
has attracted considerable attention in the past two decades is de novo designed peptides. The exploitation of peptides
and their self-assembling properties to design hydrogels in particular
has been the focus of significant efforts due to their potential for
use in a variety of biomedical applications such as cell therapy,[1,2] tissue regeneration,[3−8] and drug delivery.[9−11] A number of molecular designs have been developed
for the synthesis of self-assembling peptides with the four main families
being amphiphilic peptides,[12] short peptide
derivatives, α-helix/coiled-coil peptides,[13,14] and β-sheet peptides.[15−17] All these designs allow the synthesis
of peptides that under appropriate conditions self-assemble to form
elongated fibers. Above a critical gelation concentration (CGC) these
fibers entangle and/or associate to form three-dimensional networks
that have the ability to trap water, i.e., form hydrogels.β-Sheet
peptides are of particular interest as these peptides
allow the fabrication of very stable hydrogels with properties that
can be tailored through peptide design, media properties, and processing.
We have recently investigated the self-assembly and gelation properties
of a family of β-sheet peptides[18−20] based on the design
developed by Zhang and co-workers.[21−23] This design, which is
based on the alternation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues,
allows the synthesis of peptides that self-assemble into antiparallel
β-sheet fibrils. Because of the design used, these antiparallel
β-sheet fibrils have a hydrophobic and a hydrophilic face as
schematically shown in Figure . It is thought that in order to minimize contact between
water and the hydrophobic faces, these β-sheet fibrils associate
by pairing to form β-sheet fibers with the hydrophobic residue
side chains buried in the fiber core (Figure ).
Figure 1
Top: schematic representation of the self-assembling
and gelation
processes of β-sheet forming peptides. Bottom left: schematic
representation of an extended β-sheet fiber. Bottom right: molecular
structures of F9 and FC9-BM.
Top: schematic representation of the self-assembling
and gelation
processes of β-sheet forming peptides. Bottom left: schematic
representation of an extended β-sheet fiber. Bottom right: molecular
structures of F9 and FC9-BM.One of the most attractive properties of these systems is
their
ease of functionalization. Usually this is achieved by covalently
linking the desired functional group to the peptide to create a functional
peptide which then can be dosed as required into the system to create
functional hydrogels through self-assembly. In order to avoid affecting
the self-assembling properties of the peptides, their functionalization
is usually achieved by linking the functionality to one of the peptide’s
chain termini.[3,24−28] Here we are interested in looking at the possibility
to functionalize the peptide fibrils through its hydrophobic face
in order to bury the functionality in the hydrophobic core of the
peptide fiber.For this study we have chosen the self-assembling
peptide FEFKFEFKK
(F9) (F: phenylalanine; K: lysine; E: glutamic acid) which forms stable
β-sheet-rich fibers and hydrogels at pH 5.5.[29−31] The peptide
was functionalized by replacing the third phenylalanine residue with
cysteine. The nucleophilic thiol group of cysteine was then reacted
with 2,3-dibromomaleimide to generate the peptide–bromomaleimide
conjugate FEFKC(BM)EFKK (FC9-BM) through a straightforward
nucleophilic substitution (Figure ). The introduction of this modification does not affect
the isoelectric point of the peptide and therefore does not affect
the pH dependency of the peptide self-assembly and gelation properties.
A pH of 5.5 was chosen for this study as it corresponds to the optimal
pH (stability and homogeneity) for the gelation of these peptides,
which at this pH carry a theoretical charge of +2. Hybrid hydrogels
were prepared by mixing F9 and FC9-BM in the desired proportions while
keeping the overall molar concentration of peptide constant. Attenuated
total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)
and circular dichroism (CD) were used to investigate how the BM modification
affected the conformation adopted by the peptide, while transmission
electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and small-angle
X-ray scattering (SAXS) were used to investigate the effect on fiber
morphology and network topology. Finally, shear rheometry was used
to investigate the effect on hydrogel mechanical properties.
Figure 2
Scheme of the
synthetic route used to produce FC9-BM peptide.
Scheme of the
synthetic route used to produce FC9-BM peptide.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The
peptides used for this study FEFKFEFKK
and FEFKCEFKK were purchased from Biomatik Corporation (Wilmington,
DE) with a purity >95% (confirmed in house by ESI-MS and RP-HPLC).
All solvents and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used
as received.
Synthesis of FEFKC(BM)EFKK (FC9-BM)
FC9-BM was synthesized
according to the scheme shown in Figure . Peptide FEFKCEFKK (FC9) (75 mg, 55
μmol) was first dissolved in 4.5 mL of ddH2O. A solution
of 2,3-dibromomaleimide (DBM) (14 mg, 55 μmol) in 500
μL of dimethylformamide (DMF) was added dropwise to the
FC9 solution under vigorous stirring, and then the solution was left
stirring for 24 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then
lyophilized to give 79 mg (94% yield) of FC9-BM as a yellow residue.
The molecular weight and purity of the product were confirmed by ESI-MS
(Figure ESI 1; m/z: 1379.5 [M +
H]+) and RP-HPLC (Figure ESI 2; purity 95%) (see Supporting Information for detailed methodology).
The FC9-BM peptide was thus directly used for hydrogels preparation
without further purification.
Sample Preparation
Peptide powders were dissolved in
HPLC grade water by sonication at 80 kHz for 30 min, and the solution
pH was adjusted to pH 5.5 by the stepwise addition of 0.5 M NaOH solution.
The final sample concentration was 30 mM. The hydrogel was left overnight
in a fridge at 4 °C to equilibrate and used the following day.
Attenuated Total Reflectance–Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)
Hydrogels were spread as prepared
onto the crystal surface of a Bruker ALPHA-P FT-IR spectrometer equipped
with a multibounce attenuated total reflectance (ATR) plate. The transmittance
spectra were recorded (128 scans) between 4000 and 400 cm–1 with a resolution of 4 cm–1. HPLC grade water
was used as background and was automatically subtracted from the recorded
spectra using the OPUS software provided with the instrument. Peak
area relative intensity was evaluated by fitting the 1624 cm–1 peak using a GassAmp function (Origin 9.0) after subtraction of
a straight baseline in the amide I region (1600–1700 cm–1). The total intensity of the amide I region was obtained
by integration.
Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy (CD)
Circular dichroism
measurements were performed on a ChiraScan, Applied Photophysics.
Samples were prepared by diluting the hydrogels 20-fold in HPLC grade
water. Samples were placed in a 0.1 mm quartz cell (Hellma) and spectra
recorded at wavelengths from 200 to 280 nm, with a 1 nm step size
and response time of 0.5 s. The ellipticity data acquired in mdeg
were converted to mean residue molar ellipticity ε in deg cm2 dmol–1 residue–1 throughwhere θ is the ellipticity
in mdeg, C the sample molar concentration, N the
number of backbone amide bonds, and L the cell optical
path length in cm.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Hydrogels were
first diluted 10-fold using ddH2O and then negatively stained.
A carbon-coated copper grid (400 mesh from Electron Microscopy Sciences)
was placed on a 10 μL droplet of sample for 1 min and excess
liquid drained off using lint-free tissue. The grid was then placed
on a 10 μL droplet of ddH2O for 10 s before excess
liquid was drained off. The grid was then transferred to a 10 μL
droplet of a 1% uranyl acetate solution for 30 s, and again excess
liquid was drained off. Finally, the grid was transferred to a 10
μL droplet of ddH2O for 10 s before excess liquid
was drained off for a final time. The sample was then left to dry
before imaging using a FEI Tecnai12 BioTwin TEM at 100 keV.
Atomic
Force Microscopy (AFM)
Hydrogels were first
diluted 10-fold using ddH2O. 50 μL of this solution
was pipetted onto freshly cleaved mica. After 1 min excess solution
was removed and the surface washed twice with 1 mL of ddH2O. Excess water was then removed once again by wicking using Whatman
No.1 filter paper. The samples were allowed to air-dry prior to imaging.
Samples were imaged by intermittent contact (“tapping”)
mode in air using a Bruker Multimode AFM with a Nanoscope V controller
and a “J” scanner. Imaging was performed using Olympus
high aspect ratio etched silicon probes (OTESPA) with nominal spring
constant of 42 N m–1 (Bruker AXS S.A.S, France).
Drive amplitude and cantilever oscillation, which varied between 300
and 350 kHz, were determined by the Nanoscope (v8.15) software. The
amplitude set point was adjusted to just below the point at which
tip–sample interaction was lost. Height, phase, and amplitude
images with scan sizes of either 2 or 5 μm2 were
captured at a scan rate of 1.5 Hz and at a relative humidity of <40%.
Data were first-order flattened using the Nanoscope Analysis (v1.4)
software prior to image export.
Oscillatory Rheology
Rheological studies were carried
out on a stress-controlled rheometer (Discovery HR-2, TA Instruments)
equipped with a solvent trap to minimize evaporation, using a 20 mm
parallel plate geometry. 500 μL of peptide hydrogel was loaded
onto the stage, and the gap between the stage and the upper plate
set to 250 μm. The loaded sample was then left for 2 min to
equilibrate at 25 °C before measurement. Excess sample was carefully
removed with a spatula from around the plate. Strain sweeps were measured
between 0.04 and 40% strain at an oscillation frequency of 1 Hz. Radial
frequency sweeps were undertaken between 0.01 and 15 Hz, using a strain
of 0.2%, which is within the linear viscoelastic regime (LVR) of all
samples. All measurements were repeated at least three times.
Small-Angle
X-ray Scattering
SAXS measurements were
performed at Diamond Light Source beamline B21 equipped with a using
a BIOSAXS robot for sample loading and a PILATUS 2M (Dectris, Switzerland)
detector. The X-ray wavelength used was 0.1 nm corresponding to an
energy of 12.4 keV, and the sample–detector distance was 4.018
m giving an accessible q-range of 0.05–4.0
nm–1. Data were reduced, and solvent and capillary
contributions were subtracted using the DawnDiamond software suite.
Samples were prepared by directly at 3 mM concentration following
the methodology described above. The SAXS patterns were collected
3 days after sample preparation.
Results and Discussion
A series of F9/FC9-BM hybrid hydrogels were prepared at constant
overall peptide molar concentration of 30 mM by varying the ratio
of FC9-BM added from 0% (pure F9) to 100% (pure FC9-BM). All samples
formed hydrogels at pH 5.5 suggesting the formation, in all cases,
of extended fibrillar networks.First ATR-FTIR and CD were used
to investigate the conformation
adopted by the peptides. In Figure , the ATR-FTIR spectra obtained for all the samples
as prepared are presented.
Figure 3
Left: ATR-FTIR spectra obtained for F9/FC9-BM
hybrid hydrogels
with an overall peptide molar concentration of 30 mM. Right: 1624
cm–1 β-sheet peak relative intensity vs FC9-BM
content.
Left: ATR-FTIR spectra obtained for F9/FC9-BM
hybrid hydrogels
with an overall peptide molar concentration of 30 mM. Right: 1624
cm–1 β-sheet peak relative intensity vs FC9-BM
content.As expected, the pure F9 hydrogel
spectrum shows two strong absorption
peaks at 1624 and 1524 cm–1 corresponding to the
adoption by this peptide of an extended β-sheet conformation.
For the pure FC9-BM hydrogel in addition to the peak at 1624 cm–1 a strong broad peak is also observed at 1651 cm–1 assigned to random coil conformation.[32,33] The presence of both peaks suggests that the presence of the BM
side group is frustrating the adoption by this peptide of a fully
extended β-sheet conformation. As can be seen from the structures
of the two peptides presented in Figure , the BM side group likely disrupts the overall
ordering/packing of the phenylalanine rings, resulting in a loss of
the fully extended β-sheet conformation. When the amount of
FC9-BM in the hydrogels is increased, the relative intensity (in relation
to the overall intensity of the amide I region) of the peak at 1624
cm–1 decreases (Figure ), suggesting a decrease in β-sheet
content. Interestingly, although the relative intensity decreases
linearly for samples with FC9-BM content higher than 25%, the sample
with an overall fraction of FC9-BM of 12.5% exhibits a lower than
expected relative intensity, pointing toward a proportionally stronger
disruptive effect of introducing small amounts of FC9-BM on the overall
content of peptide adopting an extended β-sheet conformation.
This would suggest that in order to accommodate FC9-BM in the structure
the adjacent F9 peptides also lose some of their extended conformation.CD confirmed these results. As can be seen from Figure for the F9 sample a strong
negative band is observed at 218 nm with a strong positive signal
being observed below 205 nm. These CD spectra features are typical
of β-sheet secondary structure in proteins.[34] When FC9-BM is introduced into the system, although for
12.5% and 25% samples the peak at 218 nm is unchanged, the strong
positive signal below 205 nm is lost, suggesting a decrease in β-sheet
content. Indeed, the CD signal associated with random coil secondary
structure in proteins presents a small positive band in the 205–230
nm region but a strong negative band in the 185–205 region.[34] In agreement with the ATR-FTIR data, similar
CD signals were obtained for the 12.5% and 25% samples, suggesting
a similar β-sheet content. For samples with a FC9-BM content
higher than 25% a significant decrease in the 218 nm band is observed,
indicating a further decrease in β-sheet content. An additional
band is observed at 222 nm, which in the literature has been assigned
to aromatic residues, in our case phenylalanine. Its exact origin
is still matter of debate and it is thought that it is related to
the ordering of the aromatic rings.[34]
Figure 4
CD spectra
obtained for F9/FC9-BM solutions prepared by 20-fold
dilution of hybrid hydrogels with overall peptide molar concentrations
of 30 mM.
CD spectra
obtained for F9/FC9-BM solutions prepared by 20-fold
dilution of hybrid hydrogels with overall peptide molar concentrations
of 30 mM.The ability of both peptides to
form extended fibrillar structures
was confirmed by TEM and AFM (Figure ). Clear differences in fiber morphologies can be observed
via TEM. For the F9 sample thin relatively straight fibers that associate
along their length to form thicker bundles were observed. The width
of the thinnest fibers observed was ∼3–4 nm, in good
agreement with the adoption by this peptide of an extended β-sheet
conformation while fiber bundle sizes varied from ∼5 up to
∼20 nm. For the FC9-BM sample thin kinked fibers were observed.
In this case, too, the smallest fibers observed were found to have
a width of ∼3–4 nm, but no extensive fiber association
was observed resulting in very few large fiber bundles being observed.
For the 50% F9/50% FC9-BM sample an intermediate morphology is observed.
The TEM images suggest that the introduction of the BM modification
results in a change in fiber morphology from straight to kinked correlating
well with the loss of extended β-sheet conformation revealed
by ATR-FTIR and CD. This change in fiber morphology is thought to
result in a decrease in the ability of the fibers to associate along
their length and form larger bundles. Close inspection of the FC9-BM
TEM micrograph clearly shows fibers close to each other, but due to
their kinked nature, they are unable to align and associate along
their length and form large bundles (arrows in Figure ) as observed for the F9 sample.
Figure 5
TEM (top) and
AFM height (bottom) images obtained for the different
samples. Arrows in the TEM of 100% FC9-BM show example of kinks in
fibers (see text for further details).
TEM (top) and
AFM height (bottom) images obtained for the different
samples. Arrows in the TEM of 100% FC9-BM show example of kinks in
fibers (see text for further details).The reduced tendency for FC9-BM system to form extended fiber
bundles
was confirmed by AFM. It should be noted that TEM and AFM sample preparation
methods are very different. While for TEM only few fibers/fiber aggregates
are collected on the grids and imaged, in AFM significantly higher
density of fibers/fiber aggregates are deposited on the mica surface,
allowing us to observe a morphology which is closer to the overall
network topology expected for these systems. As can be seen from Figure much thinner features/fibers
are observed for FC9-BM sample compared to F9 sample, confirming the
TEM results.TEM and AFM require significant sample preparation
and give two-dimensional
images of three-dimensional structures; therefore, SAXS was used to
confirm the increased propensity for F9 to form fiber aggregates compared
to FC9-BM. In this case the samples were prepared direct at the required
concentration with no further sample manipulation. In Figure the scattering patterns obtained
for the three samples F9, 50% F9/50% FC9-BM, and FC9-BM are presented.
As can be seen from the log vs log plots, at low q a clear q–1 behavior typical
of the scattering of fibers can be observed for the FC9-BM sample.
For the 50% F9/50% FC9-BM and F9 samples as the amount of FC9-BM decreases,
the scattering pattern deviates increasingly from the expected q–1 behavior. This deviation from the
expected scattering pattern of infinitely long thin fibers is even
more evident in the ln qI(q) vs q2 representations. Indeed,
it has been shown that for thin rod-like structures (i.e., fibers)
for qRσ < 1 (Rσ: cross-section radius of gyration) the scattering
intensity can be written as[35,36]As can be seen from Figure , a linear behavior is observed at low q only for FC9-BM, suggesting that for this sample the fibers
can indeed be considered as infinitely long thin rod-like structures.
From the fitting of the linear region Rσ can be estimated as 1.7 ± 0.2 nm, which corresponds to a fiber
diameter of 4–6 nm, in good agreement with the TEM results.
For the other two samples no linear region is observed, indicating
that in this case the scattering objects cannot be considered as thin
infinitely long rods. Instead, a “roll-over” is present,
characteristic of asymmetric objects,[37,38] which is in
good agreement with the interpretation made above of F9 favoring the
formation of fiber bundles/aggregates. The scattering observed for
these samples becomes complex and will be a mixture of scattering
from the single fibers and fiber bundles/aggregates of different sizes.
Figure 6
Log vs
log (left) and ln qI(q) vs q2 representation of the
SAXS scattering pattern obtained for the 100% F9, 50% F9 + 50% FC9-BM,
and 100% FC9-BM samples prepared at 3 mM concentration.
Log vs
log (left) and ln qI(q) vs q2 representation of the
SAXS scattering pattern obtained for the 100% F9, 50% F9 + 50% FC9-BM,
and 100% FC9-BM samples prepared at 3 mM concentration.FTIR and CD suggest that the introduction of FC9-BM
results in
a loss of β-sheet conformation, which is expected to affect
the fiber intrinsic properties (e.g., flexibility). On the other hand,
TEM, AFM, and SAXS suggest that the introduction of FC9-BM results
in a change in the network topology, FC9-BM sample showing a significant
lower level of fiber bundling/aggregation. This change in network
topology is expected to affect the intrinsic properties of the network
(e.g., elasticity). The bulk mechanical properties of the hydrogels
will be a function of both the intrinsic properties of the fibers
and the intrinsic properties of the fibrillar network.We investigated
how the introduction of FC9-BM affected the mechanical
properties of the hydrogels using shear rheometry. In Figure the shear moduli obtained
for the hydrogels are presented as a function of FC9-BM content. As
can be observed, there is a significant decrease in G′ (an order of magnitude) when 12.5% of FC9-BM is introduced
in the system with an additional small decrease when the content of
FC9-BM is increased further. The loss in β-sheet conformation
as revealed by FTIR and CD translates at the macroscopic level into
a significant decrease in G′. The TEM and
AFM images suggest that the introduction of FC9-BM ultimately leads
to a change in the network topology from a network formed by thick
bundles of relatively straight fibers to a network formed by thin
kinked fibers. One would expect indeed the latter topology to result
in a hydrogel with a lower shear modulus but a higher elasticity.
The increase in elasticity (in other words, a decrease in brittleness)
is clearly shown by the strain sweep experiments that allow determination
of the size of the linear viscoelastic regime (LVR). As can be seen
from Figure , the
LVR size increases significantly upon introduction of FC9-BM in the
system, pointing toward the formation of a more elastic, less brittle,
network.
Figure 7
Left: shear modulus (G′) of F9/FC9-BM composite
hydrogels at 15 Hz obtained from the frequency sweep experiments performed
at 0.2% strain vs FC9-BM content. Right: strain sweep experiments
for the 100% F9 (●, ○), 75% F9/25% FC9-BM (⧫,
◊), and 100% FC9-BM sample (■, □) (close symbols: G′; open symbols: G″). All
samples had an overall peptide molar concentration of 30 mM.
Left: shear modulus (G′) of F9/FC9-BM composite
hydrogels at 15 Hz obtained from the frequency sweep experiments performed
at 0.2% strain vs FC9-BM content. Right: strain sweep experiments
for the 100% F9 (●, ○), 75% F9/25% FC9-BM (⧫,
◊), and 100% FC9-BM sample (■, □) (close symbols: G′; open symbols: G″). All
samples had an overall peptide molar concentration of 30 mM.A number of theories that relate
topology of networks formed to
moduli of hydrogels can be found in the literature. One such theory
was developed by Jones and Marques[39] for
rigid polymer networks and relates the shear modulus to the fractal
dimension DF of the objects forming the
network through the power lawwhere C is the concentration
of objects contributing to the network elasticity.For a network
formed by straight (between junctions) thin fibers DF is expected to be 1 corresponding to a power
law of C2. Good agreement with the Jones
and Marques theory was indeed obtained for the FC9-BM system for which
a power law of C1.8±0.2 was obtained
(Figure ). For this
system as our SAXS result show the system can indeed be considered
as being formed by thin straight fibers.
Figure 8
Log–log plot of
shear moduli (G′)
vs molar concentrations obtained for F9 (●) and FC9-BM (○)
hydrogels.
Log–log plot of
shear moduli (G′)
vs molar concentrations obtained for F9 (●) and FC9-BM (○)
hydrogels.For the F9 system a power law
of C3.7±0.3 was obtained. As discussed
by Ramzi et al., a higher exponent can
originate from the presence of a high number of pendent fibers (not
connected to the network) as the effective concentration (concentration
of objects actively participating to the elasticity of the network)
is lower than the nominal concentration of objects.[40] From the TEM pictures obtained in our case, it is unlikely
that a significant number of pendant fibers are present in our systems.
On the other hand, for the F9 system the formation of large bundles
of fibers is observed. In this case each bundle will act as a single
element contributing to the elasticity of the network. As a result,
the actual effective concentration of object participating to the
elasticity of the network is reduced and leads probably to a higher
exponent. This interpretation would imply that the difference in measured
and expected exponent is an indirect measure of the level of fiber
association and bundling in these systems and therefore that Jones
and Marques theory could be used to characterize the association and
bundling tendency of β-sheet forming peptide through shear moduli
measurements.
Conclusions
We have investigated
the effect of functionalizing the β-sheet
forming peptide FEFKFEFKK through the hydrophobic face by replacing
one of the phenyl ring groups with a bromomaleimide group. Our
results show that the introduction of this modification results in
a loss of the extended β-sheet conformation adopted by the peptide.
This leads to a change in the fiber morphology from straight to kinked
leading to a reduced ability to associate and bundle. As a result
of these morphological changes, the macroscopic mechanical properties,
in this case shear modulus, of the hydrogel decrease while its elasticity
increases. The characterization of the level of association and bundling
in these systems is notoriously difficult, and here we suggest an
indirect characterization of this phenomenon through the use of the
theory developed by Jones and Marques.
Authors: Michael R Caplan; Elissa M Schwartzfarb; Shuguang Zhang; Roger D Kamm; Douglas A Lauffenburger Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Michael R Caplan; Elissa M Schwartzfarb; Shuguang Zhang; Roger D Kamm; Douglas A Lauffenburger Journal: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed Date: 2002 Impact factor: 3.517
Authors: Zahraa S Al-Garawi; Kyle L Morris; Karen E Marshall; Jutta Eichler; Louise C Serpell Journal: Interface Focus Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Mohamed A Elsawy; Jacek K Wychowaniec; Luis A Castillo Díaz; Andrew M Smith; Aline F Miller; Alberto Saiani Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 6.978
Authors: Laura L E Mears; Emily R Draper; Ana M Castilla; Hao Su; Bart Dietrich; Michael C Nolan; Gregory N Smith; James Doutch; Sarah Rogers; Riaz Akhtar; Honggang Cui; Dave J Adams Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: O Morris; M A Elsawy; M Fairclough; K J Williams; A Mcmahon; J Grigg; D Forster; A F Miller; A Saiani; C Prenant Journal: J Labelled Comp Radiopharm Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 1.921
Authors: Jacek K Wychowaniec; Andrew M Smith; Cosimo Ligorio; Oleksandr O Mykhaylyk; Aline F Miller; Alberto Saiani Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Alessandra Scelsi; Brigida Bochicchio; Andrew Smith; Victoria L Workman; Luis A Castillo Diaz; Alberto Saiani; Antonietta Pepe Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 4.396