| Literature DB >> 27089376 |
Johannes Kiefer1,2,3, Kerstin Frank4,5, Florian M Zehentbauer6, Heike P Schuchmann7.
Abstract
Water-in-oil (w/o) emulsions are of great interest in many areas of the life sciences, including food technology, bioprocess engineering, and pharmaceuticals. Such emulsions are complex multi-component systems and the molecular mechanisms which lead to a stable emulsion are yet to be fully understood. In this work, attenuated total reflection (ATR) infrared (IR) spectroscopy is applied to a series of w/o emulsions of an aqueous anthocyanin-rich bilberry extract dispersed in a medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil phase. The content of the emulsifier polyglycerin-polyricinoleat (PGPR) has been varied systematically in order to investigate whether or not its concentration has an impact on the molecular stabilization mechanisms. The molecular stabilization is accessed by a careful analysis of the IR spectrum, where changes in the vibrational frequencies and signal strengths indicate alterations of the molecular environment at the water/oil interface. The results suggest that adding emulsifier in excess of 1% by weight does not lead to an enhanced stabilization of the emulsion.Entities:
Keywords: MCT oil; anthocyanin; functional food; hydrogen bonding; interfacial layer; vibrational spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27089376 PMCID: PMC4931473 DOI: 10.3390/bios6020013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Schematic of the measurement principle. The infrared (IR) radiation is propagating in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) crystal. It undergoes total internal reflection at the surface, where the crystal is in contact with the emulsion sample. The intensity distribution of the evanescent field is illustrated as a function of distance from the surface.
Figure 2IR spectrum of aqueous bilberry extract solution. The small peak around 2300 cm−1 is an experimental artifact of the diamond crystal involved in the ATR measurement.
Fitting parameters of the aqueous bilberry extract solution spectrum. Center frequency, peak width, and the percentage intensity with respect to the overall band by peak area are given for the six individual Gaussian profiles.
| Profile | Center Wavenumber in cm−1 | Width in cm−1 | Intensity in % |
|---|---|---|---|
| peak 1 | 3625 | 94 | 2.24 |
| peak 2 | 3522 | 155 | 12.48 |
| peak 3 | 3375 | 188 | 39.27 |
| peak 4 | 3230 | 172 | 29.07 |
| peak 5 | 3117 | 200 | 14.14 |
| peak 6 | 2950 | 200 | 2.80 |
Figure 3Chemical structure of the emulsifier polyglycerin-polyricinoleat (PGPR). (a) General structure where R can be a hydrogen atom or a ricinoleic acid or a polyricinoleic acid substituent; (b) Structure of ricinoleic acid; (c) 3D model of the structure of diricinoleic acid.
Figure 4IR spectrum of the PGPR emulsifier. The small peak around 2300 cm−1 is an experimental artifact of the diamond crystal involved in the ATR measurement.
Figure 5IR spectrum of the medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil. The small peak around 2300 cm−1 is an experimental artifact of the diamond crystal involved in the ATR measurement.
Figure 6IR spectra of the oil phases containing different amounts of emulsifier. The percentages in the legend are wt % PGPR. The zoomed in region shows the C=O stretching peak. The small peak around 2300 cm−1 is an experimental artifact of the diamond crystal involved in the ATR measurement. The zoomed in region in the circle shows the isosbestic point at 1735 cm−1.
Figure 7IR spectra of the emulsions in the OH stretching region and the fitted Gaussian profiles. (a) Aqueous bilberry extract solution; (b) Emulsion with 1% PGPR; (c) Emulsion with 5% PGPR; (d) Emulsion with 10% PGPR.
Center frequencies in cm−1 of the six individual Gaussian profiles obtained from fitting the infrared OH bands of the aqueous solution and the three emulsions.
| Profile | Aqueous Solution | Emulsion with 1% PGPR | Emulsion with 5% PGPR | Emulsion with 10% PGPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peak 1 | 3625 | 3625 | 3625 | 3624 |
| peak 2 | 3522 | 3544 | 3544 | 3542 |
| peak 3 | 3375 | 3416 | 3416 | 3414 |
| peak 4 | 3230 | 3291 | 3290 | 3290 |
| peak 5 | 3117 | 3198 | 3198 | 3198 |
| peak 6 | 2950 | 3025 | 3025 | 3025 |
Peak widths in cm−1 of the six individual Gaussian profiles obtained from fitting the infrared OH bands of the aqueous solution and the three emulsions.
| Profile | Aqueous Solution | Emulsion with 1% PGPR | Emulsion with 5% PGPR | Emulsion with 10% PGPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peak 1 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| peak 2 | 155 | 155 | 155 | 155 |
| peak 3 | 188 | 188 | 188 | 188 |
| peak 4 | 172 | 172 | 172 | 172 |
| peak 5 | 200 | 195 | 195 | 195 |
| peak 6 | 200 | 160 | 160 | 160 |
Percentage intensity with respect to the overall band by peak area of the six individual Gaussian profiles obtained from fitting the infrared OH bands of the aqueous solution and the three emulsions.
| Profile | Aqueous Solution | Emulsion with 1% PGPR | Emulsion with 5% PGPR | Emulsion with 10% PGPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peak 1 | 2.24 | 2.68 | 2.64 | 2.61 |
| peak 2 | 12.48 | 13.23 | 12.61 | 12.76 |
| peak 3 | 39.27 | 41.34 | 42.61 | 41.90 |
| peak 4 | 29.07 | 18.06 | 17.80 | 17.41 |
| peak 5 | 14.14 | 20.14 | 19.85 | 20.00 |
| peak 6 | 2.80 | 4.55 | 4.49 | 5.32 |