Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with and without primary atrial vulnerability. Clinical and electrophysiological differences.

Primary atrial vulnerability defined as induction of repetitive atrial firing by a single atrial extrastimulus cannot always be demonstrated in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The authors studied the electrophysiological differences between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with and without primary atrial vulnerability. In 14 of 31 patients with documented history of atrial fibrillation, single extrastimulation at the high right atrium initiated repetitive atrial firing defined as rapid disorganized atrial activity continuing longer than 1 second. In the 14 patients with vulnerable atrium, the atrial effective and functional refractory were periods significantly shorter and the duration of the local atrial electrogram of the premature beat was longer and was fractionated. The % sinus node recovery time was longer in patients without vulnerability. Nine of the 17 patients without atrial vulnerability had sinus node dysfunction, and 4 of the remaining 8 patients had a repetitive type of atrial automatic tachycardia. In contrast, only 3 (21%) of the 14 patients with vulnerability had sinus node dysfunction, and none showed repetitive atrial tachycardia. The high prevalence of sinus node dysfunction or repetitive type of atrial automatic tachycardia in patients without primary atrial vulnerability suggests that these transient electrophysiological modifications which are not dealt with in the basic conditions may have a role in the enhancement of atrial vulnerability.